1) I've never called him broke...at least I don't think I have.
2) How much in stock value Trump may or may not get has absolutely no bearing on whether I can EVER call him broke. He has proven to be a horrible businessman. He has a list of failed ventures that can't be said in a single breath. Someone could give him $20 billion dollars, and I'm not confident he's still have most of that within 5 years. He's a moron and he doesn't know how to make money...clearly he doesn't.
3) Weird that you WANT him to be a billionaire. I get that you want the heroes you worship to be successful, but this is weird.
Hold on a second. You are saying you MAY have called him broke. If you had, you would have been lying. But you have repeatedly said you have never lied ever in your life. But now you are saying you possibly did lie? Flagpole, Flagpole, Flagpole. This is a tie you CAN NOT return. You just met your Waterloo.
Am I the only person who knows what the definition of "lying" means?
I have never lied in my adult life. If I called Trump, "broke," then that means I honestly thought he was at that time. I do not recall thinking that, so I don't THINK I called him broke, but I am not 100% that I didn't. I have for sure had opinions that have changed over the years.
You do know that IF I did state the opinion that Trump was broke when he wasn't broke, that that would not be a lie, right? That would mean I would have just been wrong. Being wrong is not lying. For it to be a lie, you have know what the truth is (or BELIEVE you know what the truth is) and then state that that's NOT true. So, if I said you were smart, that would be a lie.
Your excitement about this is not warranted. Learn the meaning of words.
Hold on a second. You are saying you MAY have called him broke. If you had, you would have been lying. But you have repeatedly said you have never lied ever in your life. But now you are saying you possibly did lie? Flagpole, Flagpole, Flagpole. This is a tie you CAN NOT return. You just met your Waterloo.
I'm sure he has a 30-day return policy if bought it on Amazon.
I'm sure he has a 30-day return policy if bought it on Amazon.
I don't even usually wear ties!
Flagpole - honestly, we don't care that you lie. Most of us lie (not myself). We love you as you are - warts included. Billy Joel - we love you just the way you are!
Donald J. Trump is all but certain to become the first former American president to stand trial on criminal charges after a judge on Monday denied his effort to delay the proceeding and confirmed it would begin next month.
The trial, in which Mr. Trump will be accused of orchestrating the cover-up of a simmering sex scandal surrounding his 2016 presidential campaign, had originally been scheduled to start this week. But the judge, Juan M. Merchan, had pushed the start date to April 15 to allow Mr. Trump’s lawyers to review newly disclosed documents from a related federal investigation.
Funny, like it means anything coming from you rats. Angry charges by political DA’s mean nothing
Hold on a second. You are saying you MAY have called him broke. If you had, you would have been lying. But you have repeatedly said you have never lied ever in your life. But now you are saying you possibly did lie? Flagpole, Flagpole, Flagpole. This is a tie you CAN NOT return. You just met your Waterloo.
Am I the only person who knows what the definition of "lying" means?
I have never lied in my adult life. If I called Trump, "broke," then that means I honestly thought he was at that time. I do not recall thinking that, so I don't THINK I called him broke, but I am not 100% that I didn't. I have for sure had opinions that have changed over the years.
You do know that IF I did state the opinion that Trump was broke when he wasn't broke, that that would not be a lie, right? That would mean I would have just been wrong. Being wrong is not lying. For it to be a lie, you have know what the truth is (or BELIEVE you know what the truth is) and then state that that's NOT true. So, if I said you were smart, that would be a lie.
Your excitement about this is not warranted. Learn the meaning of words.
What a liar! You taught kids in Sunday School while not believing in the Scriptures. You lied not only to the kids but to God himself. Ouch.
Donald J. Trump is all but certain to become the first former American president to stand trial on criminal charges after a judge on Monday denied his effort to delay the proceeding and confirmed it would begin next month.
The trial, in which Mr. Trump will be accused of orchestrating the cover-up of a simmering sex scandal surrounding his 2016 presidential campaign, had originally been scheduled to start this week. But the judge, Juan M. Merchan, had pushed the start date to April 15 to allow Mr. Trump’s lawyers to review newly disclosed documents from a related federal investigation.
Funny, like it means anything coming from you rats. Angry charges by political DA’s mean nothing
there’s an age old saying that you snakes still haven’t understood,
that which does not kill you, makes you stronger.
Trump still alive and kickin and MA6A not buying your goods
Hold on a second. You are saying you MAY have called him broke. If you had, you would have been lying. But you have repeatedly said you have never lied ever in your life. But now you are saying you possibly did lie? Flagpole, Flagpole, Flagpole. This is a tie you CAN NOT return. You just met your Waterloo.
Flagsmokepole has no clue. word on the street is that Trump will not only put up the half a billion, but will earn 9% on his deposit. not confirned but wouldn’t shock me
1) Well, I have ALL the clues.
2) Looks like your "word on the street" didn't happen. Trump got an unprecedented break to only have to put up $175 million and to have 10 more days to do it. Well see if he can either secure a bond for that or pay it outright. He said on Untruth Social that he had over $500 million in cash, so according to him he could have paid the full amount. His lawyers said he didn't have it though. Looks like Trump is lying there (big shock).
3) He is currently being changed $87,502 every single day that he doesn't pay up, so in 10 more days that will be another $875,000 just because he can't or won't pay today. Stupid. What he SHOULD have done if he actually DOES have $500 million in cash is pay the whole amount. Not only would that have made all the "experts" who said he didn't have it look foolish, but it would have made all you Trumpers cream your jeans over it, so a win-win for him. It would also have stopped the daily rather big interest, so that's a win-win-win.
4) If he can't pay the $175 million, then I think that shows he's in really big financial trouble. My guess though is that that number was chosen because the court knows he can pay it (Letitia James knows what his actual net worth is at this point). One thing this whole Trump legal issue (ALL of his legal issues) shows is that the rich, famous, and powerful get to operate under different rules (preferential rules) than the rest of us. It's disgusting. No matter if Trump ultimately has to pay the price for his crimes, the justice system has already failed us. It will get a little bit of credibility back once Trump loses his freedom, but it will have a long way to go still.
Am I the only person who knows what the definition of "lying" means?
I have never lied in my adult life. If I called Trump, "broke," then that means I honestly thought he was at that time. I do not recall thinking that, so I don't THINK I called him broke, but I am not 100% that I didn't. I have for sure had opinions that have changed over the years.
You do know that IF I did state the opinion that Trump was broke when he wasn't broke, that that would not be a lie, right? That would mean I would have just been wrong. Being wrong is not lying. For it to be a lie, you have know what the truth is (or BELIEVE you know what the truth is) and then state that that's NOT true. So, if I said you were smart, that would be a lie.
Your excitement about this is not warranted. Learn the meaning of words.
What a liar! You taught kids in Sunday School while not believing in the Scriptures. You lied not only to the kids but to God himself. Ouch.
Nope! I never lied to them. Not once. A scripture exists, and there is meaning behind it. I can read, even to this day, a piece of scripture and find positive meaning in it. I never once told those kids that Jesus was the son of God or that he walked on water or that Noah's Ark was a TRUE story. I taught them stories in the Bible, and those stories exist, and what I told them about them was true.
Here's also what I didn't teach the kids about what's in the Bible:
2 Kings 2:23-24
"23 From there Elisha went up to Bethel. As he was walking along the road, some boys came out of the town and jeered at him. “Get out of here, baldy!” they said. “Get out of here, baldy!” 24 He turned around, looked at them and called down a curse on them in the name of the Lord. Then two bears came out of the woods and mauled forty-two of the boys."
So, a curse in the name of the Lord resulted in bears coming out of the woods and mauling 42 boys. Nice.
I also didn't emphasize that in the Noah story, God DROWNED everyone on Earth who wasn't on Noah's boat.
I also didn't tell them that Lot's two female children got him drunk and then had sex with him and got pregnant.
You know...LOTS of things in the Bible not to tell a child. I taught them about the Good Samaritan, grace, forgiveness, don't steal...things like that...I kept it all appropriate for children. Even when talking of the birth of Jesus or Easter, I always made sure to say things like, "Today we're going to talk about the story of Easter." I never ever presented those fantastical stories as true...because they aren't.
What a liar! You taught kids in Sunday School while not believing in the Scriptures. You lied not only to the kids but to God himself. Ouch.
Nope! I never lied to them. Not once. A scripture exists, and there is meaning behind it. I can read, even to this day, a piece of scripture and find positive meaning in it. I never once told those kids that Jesus was the son of God or that he walked on water or that Noah's Ark was a TRUE story. I taught them stories in the Bible, and those stories exist, and what I told them about them was true.
Here's also what I didn't teach the kids about what's in the Bible:
2 Kings 2:23-24
"23 From there Elisha went up to Bethel. As he was walking along the road, some boys came out of the town and jeered at him. “Get out of here, baldy!” they said. “Get out of here, baldy!” 24 He turned around, looked at them and called down a curse on them in the name of the Lord. Then two bears came out of the woods and mauled forty-two of the boys."
So, a curse in the name of the Lord resulted in bears coming out of the woods and mauling 42 boys. Nice.
I also didn't emphasize that in the Noah story, God DROWNED everyone on Earth who wasn't on Noah's boat.
I also didn't tell them that Lot's two female children got him drunk and then had sex with him and got pregnant.
You know...LOTS of things in the Bible not to tell a child. I taught them about the Good Samaritan, grace, forgiveness, don't steal...things like that...I kept it all appropriate for children. Even when talking of the birth of Jesus or Easter, I always made sure to say things like, "Today we're going to talk about the story of Easter." I never ever presented those fantastical stories as true...because they aren't.
All that and you repeatedly call posters here whores, f*ckers, damn f*ckers and GD f*ckers. How can you reconcile that?
there’s an age old saying that you snakes still haven’t understood,
that which does not kill you, makes you stronger.
Trump still alive and kickin and MA6A not buying your goods
Biden hasn’t been ahead in a swing state poll in 2024.
do I win something?
@SusquehannaPR Today we released our new Pa poll at @PAPressClub showing Biden leading Pa by 50%-45% margin. Sampling error is +\-4.6%. Sample size is N=450 likely voters. 2:35 PM · Mar 25, 2024 · 13K Views
I see a bunch of triggered LR libs melting down over the NY appellate court decision. Reducing Trump's fine to appeal and seeing that fat cow Leticia James failing to seize his properties. The NYC court system is full of leftist/ Trump hating judges.
Cope snowflakes. Just wait until the entire case is overturned.
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.
Nope! I never lied to them. Not once. A scripture exists, and there is meaning behind it. I can read, even to this day, a piece of scripture and find positive meaning in it. I never once told those kids that Jesus was the son of God or that he walked on water or that Noah's Ark was a TRUE story. I taught them stories in the Bible, and those stories exist, and what I told them about them was true.
Here's also what I didn't teach the kids about what's in the Bible:
2 Kings 2:23-24
"23 From there Elisha went up to Bethel. As he was walking along the road, some boys came out of the town and jeered at him. “Get out of here, baldy!” they said. “Get out of here, baldy!” 24 He turned around, looked at them and called down a curse on them in the name of the Lord. Then two bears came out of the woods and mauled forty-two of the boys."
So, a curse in the name of the Lord resulted in bears coming out of the woods and mauling 42 boys. Nice.
I also didn't emphasize that in the Noah story, God DROWNED everyone on Earth who wasn't on Noah's boat.
I also didn't tell them that Lot's two female children got him drunk and then had sex with him and got pregnant.
You know...LOTS of things in the Bible not to tell a child. I taught them about the Good Samaritan, grace, forgiveness, don't steal...things like that...I kept it all appropriate for children. Even when talking of the birth of Jesus or Easter, I always made sure to say things like, "Today we're going to talk about the story of Easter." I never ever presented those fantastical stories as true...because they aren't.
All that and you repeatedly call posters here whores, f*ckers, damn f*ckers and GD f*ckers. How can you reconcile that?
1) Some of you are f*ckers. You are one. I don't typically say or type "GD" either abbreviated like that or spelled out, so I'm pretty sure I never said that here. "Mother f*ckers" maybe and probably.
2) Regarding "whores," I disagree that I "repeatedly" call people that, but I for sure have called people that. I've called Trump a whore, because he is one. I've called Melania Trump a specific kind of whore...a "gold-digging whore," because she is one. I didn't define the term, so don't shoot the messenger.
3) Neither of the two points above though mean in any way that there aren't horrific stories in the Bible that should not be pointed out to children. What a weird point you were trying to make there. Fail.