Love this stat. When CNBC airs a ‘markets in turmoil’ show, which it just did, markets have always rallied strongly. Not as stupid as you think.
CNBC "Market in Turmoil" special program is not about calling a bottom, it's a call to action
If you have cash on the sidelines your game plan should recognize that 1-yr later $SPX has avg. return of 40% and has never been down after a MIT program $SPY$QQQ
I agree things will be almost certainly be "fine" 10 years from now. But I also think there is a small but higher than normal probability things get very bad over the next 6-24 months and that things don't become "good" again for awhile. I'm not sayin that's most likely, just that there is a real chance of it, whereas I don't think I've felt that way before. Even during the Pandemic, I saw it from the start as a blip to be exploited. I took out loans to buy the dip and doubled my money in some cases. I don't feel anywhere near that confident about circumstances today.
Also, forgot to mention Russia and everything involved in that. High gas prices are also terrible for the economy because fuel is something everyone, individuals and businesses alike, rely on and spend significant money on. For a lot of us, we are obligated to buy a certain amount of fuel no matter what we do. It's not a choice. This is not good for the economy as a whole.
I hear you.
much more likely than disaster is that these hedge funds that are blowing up will finish their forced liquidation , we’ll get some encouraging numbers on inflation, and suddenly everyone looks at those corporate earnings going through the roof while stocks are 15-25% cheaper than a few months ago. And the stock market recovers.
I get the feeling that what is happening is a) there is no desire to take long positions or put fresh money into the market because of a 'wait-and-see' attitude prevalent that stems from the fear of what will drive a market that has been fed for too long on Fed support that has abruptly ceased, and b) every rebound of a fresh bottom is shortly pounced upon by short-sellers as an opportunity for a fresh entry point and an opportunity for larger institutional investors to reduce some risk by using the favorable selling point.
We are early on in what is widely understood to be a series of interest rate hikes, and I think that without a willingness to see investors start to build their positions, the trend will be downwards,
But I also think that the reversal, when it comes, will be swift, and it is impossible to predict when that will be, as it is to predict if we have further to drop.
much more likely than disaster is that these hedge funds that are blowing up will finish their forced liquidation , we’ll get some encouraging numbers on inflation, and suddenly everyone looks at those corporate earnings going through the roof while stocks are 15-25% cheaper than a few months ago. And the stock market recovers.
I get the feeling that what is happening is a) there is no desire to take long positions or put fresh money into the market because of a 'wait-and-see' attitude prevalent that stems from the fear of what will drive a market that has been fed for too long on Fed support that has abruptly ceased, and b) every rebound of a fresh bottom is shortly pounced upon by short-sellers as an opportunity for a fresh entry point and an opportunity for larger institutional investors to reduce some risk by using the favorable selling point.
We are early on in what is widely understood to be a series of interest rate hikes, and I think that without a willingness to see investors start to build their positions, the trend will be downwards,
But I also think that the reversal, when it comes, will be swift, and it is impossible to predict when that will be, as it is to predict if we have further to drop.
I suppose it depends on how important the Fed is to the stock market.
history suggests the fed isn't all that important to the stock market since stocks tend to rise during fed tightening.
I get the feeling that what is happening is a) there is no desire to take long positions or put fresh money into the market because of a 'wait-and-see' attitude prevalent that stems from the fear of what will drive a market that has been fed for too long on Fed support that has abruptly ceased, and b) every rebound of a fresh bottom is shortly pounced upon by short-sellers as an opportunity for a fresh entry point and an opportunity for larger institutional investors to reduce some risk by using the favorable selling point.
We are early on in what is widely understood to be a series of interest rate hikes, and I think that without a willingness to see investors start to build their positions, the trend will be downwards,
But I also think that the reversal, when it comes, will be swift, and it is impossible to predict when that will be, as it is to predict if we have further to drop.
I suppose it depends on how important the Fed is to the stock market.
history suggests the fed isn't all that important to the stock market since stocks tend to rise during fed tightening.
but could be different this time, sure.
$3.5 Trillion Fed QE Financial Crisis to Pre-Covid add another $5 Trillion Covid Crisis to today. What history?
Tom Lee, Fundstrat managing partner, joins the 'Halftime Report' to discuss market volatility. For access to live and exclusive video from CNBC subscribe to ...
Over one year tech is -1%. I think most people think its much worse.
Value/divided US stocks are doing fine. Some even positive for the year
Investment quality bonds are a smoking crater...have to think that's a place to look for yield right now.
Hussman is...ok at +4.
60/40 fund is down 8% for a year. That's normal.
Looks to me that we've burned off the speculative stocks. Crushed. But the quality stuff has been doing well. Will quality be the next to fall? Do we now start buying back the speculative stuff? I sure don't know. And should we back up the truck on investment quality bonds?
Is this a blip and then we get back to buying our state-of-the-art tech companies? Or will the market continue to reward cash flow, dividends and lower valuation?
DoorDash? Ground-breaking "tech" of somebody driving Burger King to your house.
Peleton? An iPad on a stationary bike.
not sure you are aware of the many giant high quality US tech companies. Pearl in the crown. Stuff you've never heard of but enormous and wildly successful. That's kind of our national specialty in these parts.
DoorDash? Ground-breaking "tech" of somebody driving Burger King to your house.
Peleton? An iPad on a stationary bike.
not sure you are aware of the many giant high quality US tech companies. Pearl in the crown. Stuff you've never heard of but enormous and wildly successful. That's kind of our national specialty in these parts.
for example, ticker NOW. A company few have heard of.
giant $62 bn market cap
sales up 30% last year, profit doubled, no debt, $2 bn annual cash flow
that kind of thing is the national specialty, thank goodness.
We had plenty of legit tech companies during the DotCom Bubble, too.
That we have plenty of legit tech companies doesn't mean we're not in a gigantic bubble that is still deflating. Think of all the funds holding worthless companies.
We had plenty of legit tech companies during the DotCom Bubble, too.
That we have plenty of legit tech companies doesn't mean we're not in a gigantic bubble that is still deflating. Think of all the funds holding worthless companies.
Meh
the tech sector has changed from mostly speculation to mostly profitable.
times have changed. This is not the dot com era. I was there. This is not that.
times have changed. This is not the dot com era. I was there. This is not that.
No, it's the exact same. We just replaced "Dot Com" with "There's an app for that!" There is a company called Chewy which is literally the same thing as the infamously worthless company Pets.com from 20 years ago. Chewy stock reached $120/share in 2021, now down to $27.
No, it's the exact same. We just replaced "Dot Com" with "There's an app for that!" There is a company called Chewy which is literally the same thing as the infamously worthless company Pets.com from 20 years ago. Chewy stock reached $120/share in 2021, now down to $27.
Exactly the same. Uh huh. come on man try a little harder.
do you have any idea how many billions of dollars of profit the tech sector has? Maybe trillions?
Pulling up a couple of failed small companies in no way negates the vast profitability of the tech sector. Which it did not have in 1999.
and anyway you are suffering from ‘out of power pessimism.’ When someone’s political party is out of power, its voters always turn very pessimistic on the economy. It’s totally normal. You will feel better about the markets if the Rs win the house or senate in six months. Chin up.
the big difference between today and the dot.com speculation of the late nineties is the former was simply speculation on unproven companies, and today, it is probably simply being overweight on a particular sector.
But as Agip points out, it is, by and large, a sector that is profitable and integral to the operation of our economy, utilities, telecommunications, etc. The tech sector today is not fundamentally speculative, though there is certainly a corner of it that is.