"Traffic congestion" - spare me! (Maybe his watch had stopped? Or his mother called and he lost track of time? He needed to say he didn't hear the doorbell.) Every athlete could claim getting caught in traffic - or similar such BS -at some point. I'm not surprised WADA didn't buy it.
I'm surprised Alien abduction is not considered here, this would explain time loss. WADA needs to show compassion in extenuating circumstances.
Wrong again. His reasons are public and I have sufficient competence to find them.
No you haven't. You just made a few up there. In any case, his "reasons" - whatever they were - weren't accepted by WADA. That means his failures to meet his testing obligations was because he was probably doping. WADA doesn't have to say that but that's why he earns a suspension. Athletes only have reason to duck testers because they are juicing.
Why do you consistently chose to remain ignorant? As a matter of fact, I made nothing up -- those were his reasons that were made public in Nov. 2020.
I don't know about WADA, but the AIU did not challenge or reject his stated reasons for missing the tests. What was missing is that he should have updated his whereabouts.
The rest is just another cartoon you are drawing based on your proactive personal choice to remain ignorant of the real world.
No you haven't. You just made a few up there. In any case, his "reasons" - whatever they were - weren't accepted by WADA. That means his failures to meet his testing obligations was because he was probably doping. WADA doesn't have to say that but that's why he earns a suspension. Athletes only have reason to duck testers because they are juicing.
Why do you consistently chose to remain ignorant? As a matter of fact, I made nothing up -- those were his reasons that were made public in Nov. 2020.
I don't know about WADA, but the AIU did not challenge or reject his stated reasons for missing the tests. What was missing is that he should have updated his whereabouts.
The rest is just another cartoon you are drawing based on your proactive personal choice to remain ignorant of the real world.
He didn't update his whereabouts - on 3 consecutive occasions - because of the obvious; he didn't want to be tested. Or he is mentally incompetent. Which is it?
Why do you consistently chose to remain ignorant? As a matter of fact, I made nothing up -- those were his reasons that were made public in Nov. 2020.
I don't know about WADA, but the AIU did not challenge or reject his stated reasons for missing the tests. What was missing is that he should have updated his whereabouts.
The rest is just another cartoon you are drawing based on your proactive personal choice to remain ignorant of the real world.
He didn't update his whereabouts - on 3 consecutive occasions - because of the obvious; he didn't want to be tested. Or he is mentally incompetent. Which is it?
Could you remember person, man, women, camera, TV if I ask you later?
The correct answer to your false cartoon dilemma is c) None of the above.
If he didn't want to be tested, it's probably more likely he would have updated his whereabouts.
He didn't update his whereabouts - on 3 consecutive occasions - because of the obvious; he didn't want to be tested. Or he is mentally incompetent. Which is it?
Could you remember person, man, women, camera, TV if I ask you later?
The correct answer to your false cartoon dilemma is c) None of the above.
If he didn't want to be tested, it's probably more likely he would have updated his whereabouts.
I don't have to remember what you suggest, but most athletes don't have the problem that Manangoi had of updating his whereabouts - or most athletes would earn a violation. They don't. They comply.
It has also escaped you that notifying authorities of his whereabouts enables testing; that is the point.
You try so hard to excuse dopers but all you achieve is making them - and yourself - sound stupid.
Could you remember person, man, women, camera, TV if I ask you later?
The correct answer to your false cartoon dilemma is c) None of the above.
If he didn't want to be tested, it's probably more likely he would have updated his whereabouts.
I don't have to remember what you suggest, but most athletes don't have the problem that Manangoi had of updating his whereabouts - or most athletes would earn a violation. They don't. They comply.
It has also escaped you that notifying authorities of his whereabouts enables testing; that is the point.
You try so hard to excuse dopers but all you achieve is making them - and yourself - sound stupid.
Completely irrelevant, since - according to you - all are dopers.
Could you remember person, man, women, camera, TV if I ask you later?
The correct answer to your false cartoon dilemma is c) None of the above.
If he didn't want to be tested, it's probably more likely he would have updated his whereabouts.
I don't have to remember what you suggest, but most athletes don't have the problem that Manangoi had of updating his whereabouts - or most athletes would earn a violation. They don't. They comply.
It has also escaped you that notifying authorities of his whereabouts enables testing; that is the point.
You try so hard to excuse dopers but all you achieve is making them - and yourself - sound stupid.
You don't have to, but could you?
Looks like you just keep recycling insults that were once hurled at you, in order to hide your failure to intelligently establish the connection to doping you wish so hard to believe exists.
The answer to your question is still c) None of the above, because your logic is a cartoon.
I don't have to remember what you suggest, but most athletes don't have the problem that Manangoi had of updating his whereabouts - or most athletes would earn a violation. They don't. They comply.
It has also escaped you that notifying authorities of his whereabouts enables testing; that is the point.
You try so hard to excuse dopers but all you achieve is making them - and yourself - sound stupid.
Completely irrelevant, since - according to you - all are dopers.
But some prove it, by incurring a whereabouts violation.
I don't have to remember what you suggest, but most athletes don't have the problem that Manangoi had of updating his whereabouts - or most athletes would earn a violation. They don't. They comply.
It has also escaped you that notifying authorities of his whereabouts enables testing; that is the point.
You try so hard to excuse dopers but all you achieve is making them - and yourself - sound stupid.
You don't have to, but could you?
Looks like you just keep recycling insults that were once hurled at you, in order to hide your failure to intelligently establish the connection to doping you wish so hard to believe exists.
The answer to your question is still c) None of the above, because your logic is a cartoon.
The "cartoon" is a runner who kept coming up with feeble excuses for not doing what most other runners are able to do - and your believing that tosh.
But some prove it, by incurring a whereabouts violation.
Some commit a whereabouts violation. Most don't. And all are dopers. At least you say so.
Actually I don't say that but you are too dim to get that. But that point is irrelevant to whether or not a whereabouts failure suggests doping. WADA says it does.
I don't have to remember what you suggest, but most athletes don't have the problem that Manangoi had of updating his whereabouts - or most athletes would earn a violation. They don't. They comply.
It has also escaped you that notifying authorities of his whereabouts enables testing; that is the point.
You try so hard to excuse dopers but all you achieve is making them - and yourself - sound stupid.
You don't have to, but could you?
Looks like you just keep recycling insults that were once hurled at you, in order to hide your failure to intelligently establish the connection to doping you wish so hard to believe exists.
The answer to your question is still c) None of the above, because your logic is a cartoon.
Dude he's obviously doping. Get over it and move on. If I lived in a straw hut I would miss my drug tests as well.
Some commit a whereabouts violation. Most don't. And all are dopers. At least you say so.
Actually I don't say that but you are too dim to get that. But that point is irrelevant to whether or not a whereabouts failure suggests doping. WADA says it does.
I see you have provided no quote from WADA quote saying missed tests and/or filing failures "suggests" doping.
If you are so right, why do you need to lie and rely so much on false attributions? This is not a characteristic feature of the intelligent.
Looks like you just keep recycling insults that were once hurled at you, in order to hide your failure to intelligently establish the connection to doping you wish so hard to believe exists.
The answer to your question is still c) None of the above, because your logic is a cartoon.
Dude he's obviously doping. Get over it and move on. If I lived in a straw hut I would miss my drug tests as well.
You forgot your burden of supporting this baseless hypothetical allegation. The AIU did not charge him with obvious doping involving any banned substance or method.
Looks like you just keep recycling insults that were once hurled at you, in order to hide your failure to intelligently establish the connection to doping you wish so hard to believe exists.
The answer to your question is still c) None of the above, because your logic is a cartoon.
The "cartoon" is a runner who kept coming up with feeble excuses for not doing what most other runners are able to do - and your believing that tosh.
No -- the cartoon is your simpleton beliefs that you peddle without linking them to real world events and observations. I am not so gullible as to believe that "tosh".
Actually I don't say that but you are too dim to get that. But that point is irrelevant to whether or not a whereabouts failure suggests doping. WADA says it does.
I see you have provided no quote from WADA quote saying missed tests and/or filing failures "suggests" doping.
If you are so right, why do you need to lie and rely so much on false attributions? This is not a characteristic feature of the intelligent.
The repeated missed tests and filing failures do "suggest" doping or they would not be treated as a doping violation. It isn't called "athlete's clerical errors" or "dumb mistakes". Again, you fail to accept that the only alternative to Manangoi wishing to evade testing is that he is mentally incompetent. No one suggests that.
The "cartoon" is a runner who kept coming up with feeble excuses for not doing what most other runners are able to do - and your believing that tosh.
No -- the cartoon is your simpleton beliefs that you peddle without linking them to real world events and observations. I am not so gullible as to believe that "tosh".
Your "real world observations" are your fantasies.
Dude he's obviously doping. Get over it and move on. If I lived in a straw hut I would miss my drug tests as well.
You forgot your burden of supporting this baseless hypothetical allegation. The AIU did not charge him with obvious doping involving any banned substance or method.
How would they do that if he made sure he wasn't tested? Now, why would he do that ...
I see you have provided no quote from WADA quote saying missed tests and/or filing failures "suggests" doping.
If you are so right, why do you need to lie and rely so much on false attributions? This is not a characteristic feature of the intelligent.
The repeated missed tests and filing failures do "suggest" doping or they would not be treated as a doping violation. It isn't called "athlete's clerical errors" or "dumb mistakes". Again, you fail to accept that the only alternative to Manangoi wishing to evade testing is that he is mentally incompetent. No one suggests that.
It is called "whereabouts failure", and more specifically "missed test" or "filing failure".
It is not treated as a doping violation, but is treated less severely. It is one of 11 enumerated anti-doping rule violations, that is notably distinct from "use or attempted use". If it suggested "use" they would then charge him with "use", and he would receive a 4-year ban, and not the lesser, punitive 2-year ban.
I do not fail to accept, but succeed to reject your 2D cartoon false dichotomies.