"Pandemic of the unvaccinated" CONFIRMED

Also calling delivery mRNA to dendritic cells a "cell therapy" is a stretch. All vaccines are basically cell therapies then...

Usually I'd say a cell therapy must involve some sort of ex vivo modification.

I think the mistake you made was not reading beyond the home page.

You haven't commented on the fact that ImmTrac2 contains 164 million immunization records; that's unlikely to be the product of only 9.1 million people (that would be about 18 immunizations per person, on average.

What you are looking at also states that ImmTrac2 is used by 33,000 organizations. However, if you go beyond the home page, you see this:

"Join the 60,000 authorized organizations now using ImmTrac2 and benefiting from new enhancements."

It looks like the header that you're relying on is old information that hasn't been updated. At least that makes a lot more sense than your theory that the State of Texas is putting out (either negligently or intentionally) false information about how effective the vaccine is.

Your personal experience in Colorado is irrelevant to what information the State of Texas can obtain from ImmTrac2.

And as another poster has already pointed out, when you go into a hospital with Covid, you will be asked if you are vaccinated. That would be a standard part of taking a medical history. It would be part of your hospital record, and the hospital would report this to the State. So it is unlikely that a significant number of vaccinated people are being counted as unvaccinated, as you are theorizing.

Nothing to see her, just collateral damage, move along. These lives don’t count.

A$$hole.

I thought this was very interesting on Pfizer's new therapeutic pills. They are 89% effective in preventing hospitalization in "high risk people." In low risk, it drops to 70%. "Paxlovid was shown to work best when it was given within three days of the onset of symptoms, the company said."

Interestingly, that's about the same results as Ivermectin, however, the studies used to discredit Ivermectin often waited until AFTER the subject was hospitalized. Links to articles about these Ivermectin studies can be found in The Real Anthony Fauci in the endnotes. These are live links in the ebook, so you can click on them and decide for yourself.

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/effectiveness-pfizers-covid-pill-confirmed-analysis-company-says-rcna8662

fisky wrote:

I thought this was very interesting on Pfizer's new therapeutic pills. They are 89% effective in preventing hospitalization in "high risk people." In low risk, it drops to 70%. "Paxlovid was shown to work best when it was given within three days of the onset of symptoms, the company said."

Interestingly, that's about the same results as Ivermectin, however, the studies used to discredit Ivermectin often waited until AFTER the subject was hospitalized. Links to articles about these Ivermectin studies can be found in The Real Anthony Fauci in the endnotes. These are live links in the ebook, so you can click on them and decide for yourself.

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/effectiveness-pfizers-covid-pill-confirmed-analysis-company-says-rcna8662

Ya keep pushing the same nonsense and ya keep getting proven wrong time and time again. For the record:

Continuing to push something that doesn't work and actually harms people is beyond an issue of free speech.

How can this message board continue to allow nonsense like this?

Oh, I forgot to add this... Merck's pills are already approved and they are only 30% effective!

And get this, Merck held the patent on Ivermectin and sold over a billion doses for years without problems, and then when Ivermectin hit the news as a preventive, Merck warned AGAINST taking Ivermectin. Why? Maybe it was because they no longer controlled ivermectin, which can be made by anyone for pennies, AND ivermectin would compete against their new patented pill, which Merck can sell for hundreds of dollars.

It would be hard to make this up. It sounds like a movie script of corruption by evil big business moguls... and yet it is happening right before our eyes.

South African preliminary study shows Pfizer vaccine somewhat less effective against omicron vs delta strain:

Between Nov. 15 and Dec. 7, people who had received two doses of the shot and tested positive for COVID-19 had a 70% chance of avoiding hospitalisation, down from 93% during the previous wave of Delta infections, the study showed.

When it came to avoiding infection altogether, the study by South Africa's largest private health insurance administrator, Discovery Health, showed that protection against catching COVID-19 had slumped to 33% from 80% previously.

Also somewhat higher risk of reinfection and risk to children:

The study concluded there was a higher risk of reinfection during the fourth wave than during previous waves and the risk of hospitalisation among adults diagnosed with COVID-19 was still 29% lower than during the country's first wave last year.

Children appeared to have a 20% higher risk of hospital admission with complications during the fourth wave than during the first, despite a very low absolute incidence, it said.

https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/pfizer-vaccine-protecting-against-hospitalisation-during-omicron-wave-study-2021-12-14/

Read your own post. Where are the numbers? They aren't there. A "three-fold" increase could be from 2 to 6. Only two actual cases were cited. Here they are.

"An adult drank an injectable ivermectin formulation intended for use in cattle."

In the other case, an individual took something sold online... 25 pills in 5 days.

You can't legislate against stupid.

I'd guess that if someone drank the Pfizer vaccine at dose level for an 800-pound bovine, they MIGHT have adverse side effects. I'd guess that taking 25 jabs in 5 days MIGHT have adverse side effects.

My point is that if Ivermectin could be prescribed for off-label use, like the majority of prescription drugs, these people would have access to prescription-grade ivermectin WHICH HAS A BETTER SAFETY RECORD THAN TYLENOL and would have the recommended daily dose right on the bottle.

I can cite more disinformation on ivermectin. Remember the claim that ivermectin overdoses were filling the ER in Oklahoma... it never happened.

Excellent post. Thanks for helping make my point AND for making me laugh at, well... this below

When someone resorts to attacking the messenger instead of debating the message, they have lost the debate. It's an ad hominem fallacy.

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominem

They say that reinfection is about 3 times more likely than with delta. So, the reinfection with delta has been at most about 5%, so with Omicron, that would mean about 15%, which an efficacy of 85% is still far and beyond the efficacy of vaccines against delta (which is below 60% now) and what preliminary results show for Omicron (less than 30%). Odds are pretty good everyone will get Omicron. Odds are also good very few people will die from it and people will gain natural immunity that will do a much better job of preventing future outbreaks than vaccinated immunity.

By the way, personal attacks are against Message Board policy. You have been reported. We need a higher level of civility on this board.

Why is it that the people who believe the establishment narrative cannot stomach opposing viewpoints?

Never see any of us who challenge the narrative calling for censorship of those pushing the narrative.

Happy one year of Covid "vaccines".

Don't know what tomorrow will bring, but after zero shots, barely a sniffle for me in the past 365 days.

Here's a story that may indicate a further unraveling of the establishment narrative. The hospitals in Massachusetts appear to be defying the state DPH. If this is happening at Brigham & Womens, then its happening at ALL the MassGeneral/Brigham hospitals.

Those tummy tucks are BIG MONEY MAKERS.

*************

Nurses at Brigham and Women’s Hospital are accusing hospital leaders of flouting state rules to cancel certain surgeries and are asking Massachusetts officials to investigate.

The Massachusetts Nurses Association, a union that represents 3,500 Brigham nurses, told the Department of Public Health in a letter on Monday that the hospital’s operating rooms remain as busy as ever, despite a state order to curtail scheduled surgeries to make space for other patients who urgently need care.

The union wrote that nonessential surgeries such as tummy tucks were continuing unabated as patients who need urgent surgery for broken bones and brain injuries were sometimes waiting for operating rooms.

"We don’t see any action by the hospital at all to try to curb elective surgeries," said Trish Powers, an operating room nurse who chairs the union bargaining committee at the Brigham. "We feel extremely overwhelmed, not just the nurses, but physicians, technicians — everybody is so overwhelmed," she said. "We’re understaffed and have way too many patients."

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/12/13/metro/brigham-womens-nurses-accuse-hospital-defying-state-order-delay-certain-surgeries/

let's think wrote:

https://twitter.com/VigilantFox/status/1470455120513142792

Is this a real interview? That's not a hologram of Fauci...is it? Can the interview be authenticated? I've watched it over a dozen times already - I can't believe what's he's saying! He's admitting the Unicorn vaccines are a failure & they're make people worse off!

This is effing unbelievable! If it's a real interview & that's really the vaxx czar - then the vaccine hesitant & anti-vaxxers have won the war! Harambe et al & 2600 can go home in utter defeat & go down as looking as complete idiots pushing these failed vaccines! Lol.

fisky wrote:

I thought this was very interesting on Pfizer's new therapeutic pills. They are 89% effective in preventing hospitalization in "high risk people." In low risk, it drops to 70%. "Paxlovid was shown to work best when it was given within three days of the onset of symptoms, the company said."

Interestingly, that's about the same results as Ivermectin, however, the studies used to discredit Ivermectin often waited until AFTER the subject was hospitalized. Links to articles about these Ivermectin studies can be found in The Real Anthony Fauci in the endnotes. These are live links in the ebook, so you can click on them and decide for yourself.

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/effectiveness-pfizers-covid-pill-confirmed-analysis-company-says-rcna8662

There are no, non-retracted, RCTs that show near this sort of benefit for IVM. I recommend reading this. You’re just treating worms.

I want to see authentication too, but this is the final authority for all of these neo-liberal “I listen to science” clowns on here.

Caveat Emptor. Friend of mine just died because of complications that started with the vaccine. But I must be “making it up.” She was young, in good health, no known comorbidities.

Covidiocy wrote:

I want to see authentication too, but this is the final authority for all of these neo-liberal “I listen to science” clowns on here.

Caveat Emptor. Friend of mine just died because of complications that started with the vaccine. But I must be “making it up.” She was young, in good health, no known comorbidities.

Yes...I've been trying to search for that interview on "The Vigilant Fox" Twitter feed. We need to authenticate the interview right away. I've noticed no reaction from the 2600 kid who is usually Johnny-On-The-Spot in damage control & suppression of information.

If his statement is real that the vaccines are actually making people worse - then game is over & his whole agenda has been exposed. Then it's time for the pro-mandate tyrannical politicians to lift any & all mandates & apologize to the vaccine hesitant the stress they have caused us. A formal apology from Harambe et al would be nice too - but I doubt that would ever happen. Lol.