Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FGWCyv4XEAcDZqV?format=jpg&name=small
They should call them IV drug addicts. Full disclosure: i am an addict myself, so no judgment either.
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FGWCyv4XEAcDZqV?format=jpg&name=small
They should call them IV drug addicts. Full disclosure: i am an addict myself, so no judgment either.
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FGWCyv4XEAcDZqV?format=jpg&name=small
Proving my point.
Also, get your damn dirty antivaxxer hands off of Goodfellas, we know that everything antivaxxers associate with or touch turns to complete garbage/nonsense
Let's tell it like it is wrote:
https://brownstone.org/articles/medicine-should-be-non-violent/☝️“Unless you are 100% sure that this vaccine is 100% safe for 100% of those who take it (you aren’t), you have NO moral right to force or coerce it on ANYONE. In fact, choosing to do so is an evil action.”
☝️“You can strongly recommend it. You can explain why you think the benefits are worth the drawbacks and/or risks. What you can’t do – if you want to stay on the right side of morality, that is – is impose a negative consequence for making the ‘wrong’ choice. THAT is coercion.”
Nothing is ever 100% safe. We coerce people into do far far worse things than taking a safe and effective vaccine every day.
This is the peak anti-vax insanity. Demanding far more evidence for COVID vaccines than they ever have for anything, ever. Just so they can fake like they are "rational." We have more evidence behind the COVID vaccines than when we began requiring the 5 dose DTaP vaccine for public schooling....
antivaxxers killing democracy wrote:
Well, ok then wrote:
Would you agree that a strawman argument indicates you've really got nothing of value to add?
Strawman arguments would be an improvement in form for antivaxxers at this point. The quality of argument on their side has regressed to a form of trolling that even a professional, seasoned, and concerted group of trolls would struggle to emulate
Strawman arguments would require them having actual data and evidence to support ANY claim. I, too, would welcome them!
Don't worry, they will all come to RUE THE DAY they started down the PATH OF THE VAX !
Months in and the pandemic of the unvaccinated rages on.
Antivaxxers scream nonsense and are refuted daily. Yet they continue to cry and whine and fearmonger? One almost respects the masochistic tenacity.
Harambe wrote:
Months in and the pandemic of the unvaccinated rages on.
Antivaxxers scream nonsense and are refuted daily. Yet they continue to cry and whine and fearmonger? One almost respects the masochistic tenacity.
I'll save the antivaxxers some time and reply to Harambe for them:
blah blah blah informed consent blah blah blah freedumbz (to be an idiot and trample on society's freedom) blah blah blah VAERS blah blah blah medical tyranny nuremburg blah blah blah fauci nazi mengele blah blah blah everybody dies blah blah blah blah anybody agreeing with Harambe is just Harambe using an anonymous handle cause we can't handle the truth blah blah blah
antivaxxers killing democracy wrote:
Harambe wrote:
Months in and the pandemic of the unvaccinated rages on.
Antivaxxers scream nonsense and are refuted daily. Yet they continue to cry and whine and fearmonger? One almost respects the masochistic tenacity.
I'll save the antivaxxers some time and reply to Harambe for them:
blah blah blah informed consent blah blah blah freedumbz (to be an idiot and trample on society's freedom) blah blah blah VAERS blah blah blah medical tyranny nuremburg blah blah blah fauci nazi mengele blah blah blah everybody dies blah blah blah blah anybody agreeing with Harambe is just Harambe using an anonymous handle cause we can't handle the truth blah blah blah
Oh and of course
blah blah blah big pharma blah blah blah mainstream media blah blah blah
This guy is my hero. A man of vision who sees the writing on the wall and wants to get it all over and done with for 2022. He conducts his life with maximum efficiency. I salute him.
https://nypost.com/2021/12/11/man-takes-10-covid-vaccine-shots-in-single-day/
What a joke. Here's list of the most common events (> 2%). Pardon the formatting it's copied from the PDF they FOIA-ed.
Notice how all these events are the expected side effects from the vaccines happening at rate that was observed in the clinical trials.
So this big data dump is just... confirming data from trials and shows no under-reporting, hidden data, or anything nefarious.
Safety studies and monitoring is done independently (hospitals, insurers, academics, NGOs) from the manufacturer as well and we have seen zero major safety signals in any of the vaccines.
FOIA (and transparency in general) is a useful tool but requesting millions of pages is just a stunt these guys are using to get publicity and $$$.
5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports
Table 2. Events Reported in ≥2% Cases
Blood and lymphatic system
disorders
Lymphadenopathy 1972 (4.7%)
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia 1098 (2.6%)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea 5182 (12.3%)
Diarrhoea 1880 (4.5%)
Vomiting 1698 (4.0%)
General disorders and administration site conditions
Pyrexia 7666 (18.2%)
Fatigue 7338 (17.4%)
Chills 5514 (13.1%)
Vaccination site pain 5181 (12.3%)
Pain 3691 (8.8%)
Malaise 2897 (6.9%)
Asthenia 2285 (5.4%)
Drug ineffective 2201 (5.2%)
Vaccination site erythema 930 (2.2%)
Vaccination site swelling 913 (2.2%)
Influenza like illness 835 (2%)
Infections and infestations
COVID-19 1927 (4.6%)
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Off label use 880 (2.1%)
Product use issue 828 (2.0%)
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia 4915 (11.7%)
Pain in extremity 3959 (9.4%)
Arthralgia 3525 (8.4%)
Nervous system disorders
Headache 10131 (24.1%)
Dizziness 3720 (8.8%)
Paraesthesia 1500 (3.6%)
Hypoaesthesia 999 (2.4%)
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea 2057 (4.9%)
Cough 1146 (2.7%)
Oropharyngeal pain 948 (2.3%)
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus 1447 (3.4%)
Rash 1404 (3.3%)
Erythema 1044 (2.5%)
Hyperhidrosis 900 (2.1%)
Urticaria 862 (2.1%)
Total number of events 93473
Source doc:
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf
I knew from the beginning his link was misleading BS. And you had to waste a bunch of time to prove it. These antivaxxers are pretty formidable trolls
Well, ok then wrote:
carmine9 wrote:
The jab is working but be afraid.
The level of cognitive dissonance needed to believe these two polar opposites at the same time is off the charts
Would you agree that a strawman argument indicates you've really got nothing of value to add?
Do you known what a strawman argument is?
What words am I making up and putting in the mouths of the Vaxx pushers?
Are they not saying the Jab is safe and effective out of one side of their mouths while saying the Jabs we have all gotten are not enough and we need many more?
Can't you just admit to yourselves you fell for their lies and it's time to see the obvious truth?
I looked briefly at the study. Even if we assume it is 100% accurate and correct, it only covers 1Dec20 to 28Feb21. This is short-term data. The average observation time is 45 days... less when you consider the inevitable lag time between adverse effect onset and getting reported into the system.
I continue to be concerned by the unknown risks of long-term effects. The long-term effects of the mRNA vaccine are unknown
It doesn't help that people who claim to have side effects are being actively suppressed on social media. Medical professionals who have spoken out have been censured, ostracized, and even fired. It doesn't help when VAERS is a joke. I can prove that with a pencil and a cocktail napkin to write on in less than 2 minutes.
When will we have long-term data from the actual vaccine clinical trial? A year from now? 2023? 2024? The answer is...
..........never.
Pfizer unblinded the clinical trials after six months. There is no longer a control group. The clinical trial is effectively over. There's not even a requirement that Pfizer issue a six-month report.
You can't say, "Follow the science" and then ignore the science when it doesn't fit your position. You have to be intellectually honest.
Follow-up to my post claiming VAERS is a joke and vastly underreports deaths. According to the CDC, all deaths in vaccinated subjects from all causes should be reported. Here are some simple, easily verifiable data to prove that it is not being done.
US Pop age 80+: 13.1 million (Statistica.com)
US age 80+ vaccinated by 1Jun2021: 86% (CDC.gov)
Thus, 11.266 million were vaccinated by 1Jun2021, about 1/2 years ago.
Annual US mortality at age 80: 5.6% (SSA.gov)
Thus, 733,000 80+ seniors die each year.
Therefore, about 366,000 80+ vaccinated seniors have died since 1Jun2021.
Instead, VAERS is reporting... what... 14,000? I don't know because I've quit looking a VAERS as a reliable source.
What VAERS should do is track all cause deaths and compare those rates to the unvaccinated population AND to previous years of historical data by cause of death. Thus, we'd see
New cardiac events, vaxxed vs unvaxxed and vaxxed vs time since vaccination to determine if there was an incubation period from vax to onset.
I strongly suspect that this is being done secretly at the CDC, but we don't have access to that data.
The CDC and Fauci have suppressed reports of adverse effects and have not been transparent with the data. Suppression of the facts creates a fertile ground for conspiracy theories. I bought The Real Anthony Fauci expecting it to be a hit job. I have found some allegations that aren't substantiated, but if it is even half accurate, we are seeing the greatest medical malfeasance in history. Let me repeat that... the greatest medical wrongdoing in history.
I would urge everyone to read this book. If you're undecided, read the reviews. They are insightful and articulate the same theme... "read the book."
carmine9 wrote:
Well, ok then wrote:
Would you agree that a strawman argument indicates you've really got nothing of value to add?
Do you known what a strawman argument is?
What words am I making up and putting in the mouths of the Vaxx pushers?
Are they not saying the Jab is safe and effective out of one side of their mouths while saying the Jabs we have all gotten are not enough and we need many more?
Can't you just admit to yourselves you fell for their lies and it's time to see the obvious truth?
"Safe and effective" does not imply "permanent" or "perfect".
Why do you behave like a petulant child?
Well, ok then wrote:
carmine9 wrote:
Would you agree that a strawman argument indicates you've really got nothing of value to add?
Do you known what a strawman argument is?
What words am I making up and putting in the mouths of the Vaxx pushers?
Are they not saying the Jab is safe and effective out of one side of their mouths while saying the Jabs we have all gotten are not enough and we need many more?
Can't you just admit to yourselves you fell for their lies and it's time to see the obvious truth?
"Safe and effective" does not imply "permanent" or "perfect".
Seems the Omicron is very dangerous -- to the profits of Big Pharma.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOuiEWE8hZoParker Valby makes Barstool Sports' list of hottest athletes at the Olympics
Australian coach hates on his own gold medalist for her mild anti-wokery
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
Cole Hocker: "If I stay healthy, I don’t think anyone can beat me. Definitely not in America,”