More entertaining is the editorial saying she should stay:
“Many of the recent calls for Gay’s resignation suggest or allege outright that she was a “diversity hire” or a product of “DEI extremism.” The blatant racism of these criticisms only corroborates that they come in bad faith.
Not only is that insulting and unfair — it is patently untrue. Gay’s top-quality scholarship and four years of experience leading Harvard’s largest administrative unit make her eminently qualified for her post. Most importantly, Gay rose to the top of a presidential search that included dozens of highly-qualified candidates and surely other highly-qualified candidates of color.
Coming from critics with apparently little knowledge of her background, her character, or the process that selected her, these attacks barely attempt to disguise their malicious, race-baiting, and opportunistic crusade against Harvard.”