Finally...Unequivocal Proof That the Apollo Moon Landings Were Staged on Earth

I want you to fail.

Generation Jpeg wrote:

I don't want to know about weird alien stuff or government conspiracies. I desperately need a recent picture of the moon landing site, and I need it this week for a space tourism assignment.

Any pictures taken during this century will work for me. When I search online, I get Mars landers and pictures of dots with arrows saying "landing site" , but that's not what I need here.

Allright...chill out...just having some fun here. Did you go back and look at the posts here? Pablo Novi has zillions of posts that maybe has what you're looking for.

Alien Allen ?

Deliberate exaggeration is a hallmark of the: dishonest, mis-lead and/or people with weak arguments.

I've posted what a few dozen posts. Oh, and btw, in none of my posts will anyone find any would-proof that NASA put men on the moon - given that I've been QUESTIONING (I've NEVER claimed I was 100% sure and I would much rather be proven wrong) that very proposition for 50 years and still haven't found anything that proves it did.

I guess you haven't heard of the Manhattan Project.

I'm an old guy (68) and, I'd guess, typical of most of us, we're not all that savvy internet-tech-wise. All I know is that I didn't write that post in my name AND never would have written one like that - nor would hardly anybody except in jest.

I have heard of people's accounts being HACKED - so I'm assuming this is a case of that - though i have no idea how one would go about hacking an account.

THANX for the welcome back.

"What do you think of NASA scrapping the planned moon mission with astronauts that was scheduled for 2020? "

Well I'm as disappointed as can be. I'd MUCH rather learn that we went there before and are going back again; yet this ENDLESS STRING of postponed promised returns to the moon AND postponed absolute photographic proof ... no longer takes me by surprise.

My GUESS is that for sure one day humans will walk on the moon; but that we'll have to have built a much more advanced "staging" platform in low Earth orbit first AND ship up to it a "ton" of lead - for the shielding - then let robots build the thing. The sheer expense of that (combined with the more advanced-than-we-have-now technical aspects) makes me think we're at least still a couple of decades away from doing this.

I don't have anything new to add to what I (and others) have already said. So, content-wise, I won't be repeating myself here.

But I DO feel the (moral) obligation to add: my apologies for not responding earlier - I've just now noticed this post of yours from a couple of months ago. I DO appreciate you taking the time to spell out your arguments in detail - I respect you for that.

I saw an Area 51 sign next to Armstrong in one of the pics.

On My Way To An All-Nighter wrote:

2nd handle wrote:

You’re obviously “space cowboy” smarting from having your intense stupidity outed. Chumpy post? That’s your comeback. Idiot.

Aren't you the idiot because you keep posting on a thread that you think is stupid? Posters like you crack me up - you complain & bi*tch about these conspiracy theories threads but yet people like you keep posting as if you're really going to change their minds. So...who's the idiot here if you keep posting on a ridiculous, stupid conspiracy thread? Lol.

No, you’re clearly the idiot. He wasn’t complaining about the thread or conspiracy theories, he was just pointing out the guy was an idiot. You got triggered though, which is because you are an idiot.

Pablo Novi’s stupidity is rarely matched in this world. He’s so stupid it’s almost impossible to believe he’s not a troll, but he is in fact a real person who’s life goal appears to be to foster ignorance with every word he writes. The good news is that you can safely rely on the truth being the opposite of any opinion this tool espouses.

markschultz31 wrote:

For all the people claiming such a vast conspiracy couldn't be kept secret: there are literally DOZENS of wittnesses who came forward with extraordinary evidence, first and foremost the Apollo astronauts themselves:

http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/moon-astronaut-admits-on-deathbed-obama-could-be-an-alien/

Just in case anyone was wondering, worldnewsdailyreport is a satire site. The name in the article, Anthony Thompson, is not one of the Apollo astronauts (that's just what they want you think! Dun dun DUNNNNNNNN). It's slightly less credible than The Onion.

Good advice wrote:

Pablo Novi’s stupidity is rarely matched in this world. He’s so stupid it’s almost impossible to believe he’s not a troll, but he is in fact a real person who’s life goal appears to be to foster ignorance with every word he writes. The good news is that you can safely rely on the truth being the opposite of any opinion this tool espouses.

On the contrary. He has provided well researched information that runs counter to the government narrative. You in the otherhand, resort to insults which clearly shows that you cannot present an argument.

Good advice wrote:

Pablo Novi’s stupidity is rarely matched in this world. He’s so stupid it’s almost impossible to believe he’s not a troll, but he is in fact a real person who’s life goal appears to be to foster ignorance with every word he writes. The good news is that you can safely rely on the truth being the opposite of any opinion this tool espouses.

Are you crying, bro? :(

This is nonsense! wrote:

I Want To Be A Space Cowboy wrote:

There can be government cover-ups on a grand scale; silencing of people, payoffs, disinformation, etc. I personally don't trust the government for much of anything anymore. And the space program had some weird things going on, for instance: Mitchell believes a UFO crashed at Roswell with ETs aboard:

Fifty years, no one sold a story to a tabloid. Fifty years, no one went on Phil Donahue or Oprah. Fifty years no one wrote a book. The best you have is a likely demented elderly widow. You made a shift to Roswell, NM. We don't even have a mysterious level of unexplained deaths from retired NASA personnel. Basically, it's entertaining to hold on to a fantasy of a mass conspiracy.

Hey Freemason, you talk and things for you, your family and the lodge will go very, very badly. You catch my drift.

BEST Moon landing documentary proving it was a HOAX!

by You Tuber: Chillin Dog Published on Feb 12, 2018

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6IOqU9T_K-o

This MIGHT be the best summation of the strongest arguments that Apollo was a hoax.

It's certainly no proof of anything; but I've found that it does tend to be true that the:

Side that the side (of the argument) that has the weak(er) position TENDS to be the side that hurls the most insults.

Good advice said, "Pablo Novi’s stupidity is rarely matched in this world. He’s so stupid it’s almost impossible to believe he’s not a troll, but he is in fact a real person who’s life goal appears to be to foster ignorance with every word he writes. "

You, "Good Advice" seem to think you're some kind of authority on me (that I'm a real person but incredibly stupid and with the goal of fostering ignorance with every word ..."

How come you imply you know me so well, yet don't mention that I post all over the internet; and (when not talking about sports) I mostly post about political stuff ("End ALL The Wars & Police States, NOW !"). I also post constantly in DEFENSE of science (including in defense of MOST of NASA's claims; just not their Apollo claims) and AGAINST non-science / anti-science and AGAINST religious obscuratanism? Why would I SPECIFICALLY distance myself from a key PART of the position of others who also believe that Apollo was a hoax? What key part? The "Flat Earth and the Firmament" stuff; and that, according to THEM, we've never gotten past and can't & won't ever get past the "Firmament" etc. If I WERE so intent on "fostering ignorance with every word I write"?

You, along with the OP, have a tenuous grasp on the definition of the word “proof”.

So much semi-colons, brackets, caps, and quotes. What am I even looking at?

I have a question for ALL those who say that NASA's Apollo program DID land men on the moon:

How many years more have to pass (without any humans "going back" to the Moon), before you yourself begin to doubt that we went back in 1969 (-72)? 60 years (2030 ish)? 80 years (2050 ish)? 100 years? *

FIFTY YEARS seems to me to be an incredibly, unbelievably long period to not even get within 1% of the distance of what we supposedly did back then (with relatively super-primitive technology).

* I assume that someday we will get to the Moon (and Mars and to other moons of the Solar System beside our Moon). But I HIGHLY DOUBT that we had the tech, almost 50 years ago, to get humans safely thru the Van Allen Radiation Belts AND land & keep them safely on the Moon.