At least so far, it's hard to find detailed or focused reports of the opening day in Trump's Porn Interference trial. But the Pecker Necker testimony appears to have been very uneventful. It seems like the prosecution didn't try to get the emails and texts into evidence through Pecker, almost to the point of wondering why he was even called to the stand? As far as I can tell, he hardly said anything other than some background stuff as to how National Enquirer operated.
Trump was giving Pecker Necker the stink eye from the defense table. You could tell Trump had visions in his mind of grabbing Pecker by the neck and mashing a plate of spaghetti into his face, like he did that time with Giuliani. To Trump's credit, he restrained himself and didn't make any throat slitting gestures at Pecker or anything like that.
The Drudge headline is "Trump and his Pecker" - hahaha! Matt Drudge can't stand Trump.
Hearing tomorrow on Trump's violations of the gag order. MAG@s seems to believe that Trump is subject to the first judicial gag order in the history of American jurisprudence, issued by a Soro-appointed Trump-hating judge. Normal people know many cases over the last 5-10 decades have gag orders in place, and Trump appears to go out of his way to violate the one in his Porn case. He probably thinks all the judge will do is had down some trivial fines each time he violates the order. He's probably right.