Judge Engoron says the judgment against Trump and his companies was due in part to how unreliable Trump was as a witness when he testified in early November. Page 37: "
Overall, Donald Trump rarely responded to the questions asked, and he frequently interjected long, irrelevant speeches on issues far beyond the scope of the trial. His refusal to answer the questions directly, or in some cases, at all, severely compromised his credibility."
LMAO!
Donny thought it was all beneath him. Don is an idiot.
Yes, he fraudulently reported the payments as legal expenses (payment to his lawyer Cohen) when he should have reported it as campaign expense payment to Stephanie Clifford.
Cohen is so credible.
In August 2018, Cohen pleaded guilty to eight counts including campaign-finance violations, tax fraud, and bank fraud.
In November 2018, Cohen pleaded guilty to lying to U.S. congressional committees about efforts to build a Trump Tower in Moscow.
So because he committed crimes for Trump, he is not credible and that makes Trump credible. Is that your argument here?
This Order is pretty damning. You MAG@s should really read it for once. It's all citations to testimony at trial, where the fraud is evident and enormous. For example, read the section on Eric Trump. He's as big a fraudster as his father. Basically, judges don't like it when you LIE under oath and then get BUSTED with the lies by your OWN documents on matters of significance.
The Cheeseman could find himself in more trouble. Maybe even a violation of his plea deal in Georgia and eventually a federal obstruction charge (if the feds ever prosecute anyone other than Trump).
Em Steck, Andrew Kaczynski, Marshall Cohen, Allison Gordon
Kenneth Chesebro, the right-wing attorney who helped devise the Trump campaign’s fake electors plot in 2020, concealed a secret Twitter account from Michigan prosecutors, hiding dozens of damning posts that undercut his state...
The Cheeseman could find himself in more trouble. Maybe even a violation of his plea deal in Georgia and eventually a federal obstruction charge (if the feds ever prosecute anyone other than Trump).
Hold the phone! Isn't Chesebro the fella doing the tour of sites of his previous conspiracy crimes, cooperating with prosecutors in hopes of avoiding prosecution? He's a smooth criminal.
Wow. We always knew that all the crackpot, 3rd rate attorneys that Trump had surrounding him after he lost the election were cookoo for coco puffs. But now we learn some of these "esteemed constitutional election law experts" spent their free time sh!tposting even more crazy right wing theories on Twitter of how Trump could stay in office.
And we still have right wingers defending the big lie. the alternate elections stuff and the Just find me 11,000 votes as acceptable conduct for a President.
Wow. We always knew that all the crackpot, 3rd rate attorneys that Trump had surrounding him after he lost the election were cookoo for coco puffs. But now we learn some of these "esteemed constitutional election law experts" spent their free time sh!tposting even more crazy right wing theories on Twitter of how Trump could stay in office.
And we still have right wingers defending the big lie. the alternate elections stuff and the Just find me 11,000 votes as acceptable conduct for a President.
Meanwhile, Fanni Willis is going to be disbarred and won't even be a lawyer for her efforts to politically prosecute the scary orange man.
When will you disgusting people realize you are all much much much worse than you even dream Trump is?
Wow. We always knew that all the crackpot, 3rd rate attorneys that Trump had surrounding him after he lost the election were cookoo for coco puffs. But now we learn some of these "esteemed constitutional election law experts" spent their free time sh!tposting even more crazy right wing theories on Twitter of how Trump could stay in office.
And we still have right wingers defending the big lie. the alternate elections stuff and the Just find me 11,000 votes as acceptable conduct for a President.
Meanwhile, Fanni Willis is going to be disbarred and won't even be a lawyer for her efforts to politically prosecute the scary orange man.
When will you disgusting people realize you are all much much much worse than you even dream Trump is?
You got some data to back that up tuff guy?
Terrible optics for her but disbarred? Naw. But you are free to fantasize anyway you wish it is a free country.
Wow. We always knew that all the crackpot, 3rd rate attorneys that Trump had surrounding him after he lost the election were cookoo for coco puffs. But now we learn some of these "esteemed constitutional election law experts" spent their free time sh!tposting even more crazy right wing theories on Twitter of how Trump could stay in office.
And we still have right wingers defending the big lie. the alternate elections stuff and the Just find me 11,000 votes as acceptable conduct for a President.
Meanwhile, Fanni Willis is going to be disbarred and won't even be a lawyer for her efforts to politically prosecute the scary orange man.
When will you disgusting people realize you are all much much much worse than you even dream Trump is?
Not many Trumpers are sufficiently stupid enough to try to equate Fanni Willis consensual relationship to all of Trump's corruption.
But A-Dolt is a special kind of Trumper that has what it takes.
Meanwhile, Fanni Willis is going to be disbarred and won't even be a lawyer for her efforts to politically prosecute the scary orange man.
When will you disgusting people realize you are all much much much worse than you even dream Trump is?
Not many Trumpers are sufficiently stupid enough to try to equate Fanni Willis consensual relationship to all of Trump's corruption.
But A-Dolt is a special kind of Trumper that has what it takes.
No one cares that she spread her legs for the dude. The problem is she hired him for a job he was not qualified for and then wildly overpaid him so he could spend the money on her.
Even more troubling she then lied repeatedly about it under oath.
She's corrupt and she's going to be thrown off the case and disbarred.
No one cares that she spread her legs for the dude. The problem is she hired him for a job he was not qualified for and then wildly overpaid him so he could spend the money on her.
Even more troubling she then lied repeatedly about it under oath.
She's corrupt and she's going to be thrown off the case and disbarred.
Let’s pretend all of that is true.(it isn’t)
How does that make Trump and his fellow criminals innocent?
No one cares that she spread her legs for the dude. The problem is she hired him for a job he was not qualified for and then wildly overpaid him so he could spend the money on her.
Even more troubling she then lied repeatedly about it under oath.
She's corrupt and she's going to be thrown off the case and disbarred.
Let’s pretend all of that is true.(it isn’t)
How does that make Trump and his fellow criminals innocent?
You have no idea if it's true you're just declaring it not to be because you're in a cult.
It has no bearing on Trump's guilt or innocence but it 100% guarantees that the trial is pushed after the election which means it won't happen.
"The records do not prove, in any way, the content of the communications between Special Prosecutor Wade and District Attorney Willis; they do not prove that Special Prosecutor Wade was ever at any particular location or address; they do not prove that Special Prosecutor Wade and District Attorney Willis were ever in the same place during any of the times listed [in the exhibit]." "...on multiple dates and times cited in the defense analysis, Willis was not at home. She provided copies of calendar entries to support that contention - including entries she said show she was at the office or at murder crime scenes."
"The records do not prove, in any way, the content of the communications between Special Prosecutor Wade and District Attorney Willis; they do not prove that Special Prosecutor Wade was ever at any particular location or address; they do not prove that Special Prosecutor Wade and District Attorney Willis were ever in the same place during any of the times listed [in the exhibit]." "...on multiple dates and times cited in the defense analysis, Willis was not at home. She provided copies of calendar entries to support that contention - including entries she said show she was at the office or at murder crime scenes."
Nothingburger. More made-up smear from Roman.
The cell phone records aren't made up ffs...
You people are in a cult.
She called the dude THOUSANDS of times after 8pm when they weren't working together at a time when she said under oath they weren't in a relationship.
We often hear Trumpers cry selective prosecution. But legal experts all point out how Trump and his coconspirators keep getting treated with kid gloves.
This Roman case is a perfect example. A typical defendant would not be able to have his crackpot conspiracies about the prosecutor aired out or entertained by the judge.
