Nice post. Looking forward to the story.
Nice post. Looking forward to the story.
Scott is both a nice guy who can also be condescending, but I don't believe that post was from him as his name is not highlighted. But who knows????
Trolls
peter piker picked a.... wrote:
Scott is both a nice guy who can also be condescending, but I don't believe that post was from him as his name is not highlighted. But who knows????
My friend, I can't use scotth unless I post the password. Still not sure? Send me an email.
Haven't posted in a while - been lurking & reading posts w/varying degrees of amusement. I won't argue your claim that I can be condescending because I know how brutally honest I can be and how that's perceived is in the eye of the beholder. I'm abundantly aware I ain't perfect. Be good & enjoy the story!
Enjoy the story biotches! Letsrun doubters about to look really stupid!!!
You know what Scott, I apologize. Looking at the other side of the coin, I guess you are right as your brutal honesty can be taken the wrong way and I am guilty as charged as sometimes that how I have taken some of your posts. I'm in my 40's now and I ain't perfect either. Sorry.
What do you fancy yourself? Some kind of superhero?
Sounds like you've made this quite personal.
"he'll pay for ignoring my attempts..."
Could Scott Hubbard be a bigger nacissistic pompous A-hole??
Is Kip the guy who killed the hookers? I thought that was Chuck?
Scott Hubbard = D Bag wrote:
"he'll pay for ignoring my attempts..."
Could Scott Hubbard be a bigger nacissistic pompous A-hole??
What's he going to do next? Hide out in the bushes outside Litton's office?
That's right. Been there. Done that. LOL
I'm sorry, but I'm having a hard time understanding why you're taking the word of somebody who is accused and (as far as I'm concerned) proven, by virtue of overwhelming evidence, to be an egotistical, pathological liar. Kip says that it wasn't him who created the fictional names in the West Wyoming Marathon. Well, my God, that changes everything. He must be telling the truth, right? Sorry, but most people aren't that naive. I trust Kip Litton to tell the truth about as much as I'd trust a serial child rapist to babysit my kids.
I'm sure that others on this thread have already made the point, but this thread would have died a long time ago had Kip come clean and honestly discussed and apologized for his actions. The fact of the matter is, he has consistently tried to deny and explain away his actions while (likely) posting under pseudonyms on various sites that call him out, pretending to be a friend or neighbor and talking about how he's a great family guy and how the rumors are unfounded.
Yeah, right! I'd like to meet these "people" in person. Kip is accused of creating fake marathons and competitors on the internet. I'm sure he would never post as somebody else to try and cast himself in a positive light. What a pathetic narcissist!
Whether or not an article should ever come out, this thread will never die until Kip publicly comes clean.
And being brutally honest by posting under different aliases. LOL
kirkaz wrote:
Scott and a patient of Dr Litton's visited the dentist office on the day of the Boston marathon to see if Kip was in, which he was.
someone also called in to Dr Litton's office on that day and that someone was offered an afternoon appointment slot to see Dr Litton.
Who registered Dr Litton at Boston marathon 2012? Why didn't he race it? Why hasn't he raced since late 2010?
So you're saying scotth actually went into the office?
and was brutally honest by hiding in the bushes
Maria Venn wrote:
So you're saying scotth actually went into the office?
no idea.
Id love to hear the reaction from you aholes who doubted there was ever going to be an article
U heard it here 1st!!! wrote:
Id love to hear the reaction from you aholes who doubted there was ever going to be an article
+1
When the magazine article comes out next week, I wonder if Dr. Litton will keep a copy of it in his dental office waiting room for his patients to read while waiting?
Emails still coming in. Before reading these exchanges between Singer and Litton I was FIRMLY planted in the CHEATING camp. I am beginning to wonder now. Singer has done some weird/unethical things. He asked Litton questions about childhood family dinners, summer trips & his relationship with his sisters. He later calls neighbors asking for dirt on Litton and if he ever cheated on his wife. WTF? It makes it look like Singer is trying to destroy his family, not expose some race cheat.
Singer seems to focus on just a few races. The DQ's: obviously Detroit Relay, Deadwood & Delaware. Technically, these could have been to wrong turns or no tag. Running right in front of the lead runner/vehicle in Detroit actually indicates that it was just a mistaken turn. But Singer keeps harping on Gasparilla & Missoula. From the beginning, Litton admitted he did NOT run the full Missoula course as he DQ'd himself with an injury. So he's not even claiming it as a finish- why keep harping on that?
After Singer discovered that Litton had 4 witnesses each for Gasparilla and Missoula, why did he keep grilling him on these? He did have an email from Litton to the Missoula RD asking about a medal, but that could easily been a mistake, especially in light of 4 witnesses and Litton never filing a protest there. Article readers in mass will never believe accusations in races where Litton has 4 witnesses that counter these claims.
Singer messed up big here- as soon as he learned of the witnesses, he should have moved on to other suspicious races like Manchester, Virginia Beach, Vermont and Phoenix. He screwed up- there's even a video of him walking in Phoenix.
If Litton was guilty, Singer should NOT have avoided interrogating Litton's witnesses. Months ago, after Litton suggested several times that Singer talk to his wife, Singer said "family doesn't count". Just recently Singer said his wife refused to talk to him. But as it turns out, Singer never made any attempt over the past year to talk to her. After Litton ran a <1:20 half marathon, passing another 1:20's runner on the course, Litton offered him as a witness. Singer did talk to him but never asked about this race. Litton's training partner confirmed that Litton's finish times were actually in his range, and even though Singer talked to him, he did little to confirm this.
This smells of some kind of set-up. If Litton is guilty, why is Singer instead trying to ruin Litton's marriage and playing these unethical games that open the door for slander? If he takes Singer to court, no other writer will want to investigate.
He asks more about Litton's fund raising, but Litton's site was approved by the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, and there is no evidence of Litton keeping any money or any missing donations.
Anyone who reads all this info would come to a similar conclusion as myself. I am ALL FOR exposing race cheating, but this looks more and more like an incomplete, unfair, biased portrayal.
So my questions:
Why didn't Singer inquire about other races once he learned about witnesses?
Why did Singer purposely avoid some witnesses?
The article is ALMOST here!!