What igloo conveniently fails to tell you is that was stated US Policy because that prosecutor Shokin was corrupt AF and in the tank for Pootey. Also EU policy as well. They hope you forget that important detail and think this was private wheeling and dealing. Which it wasn't.
And this has been pointed out to him and his cohort numerous times over the course of several years. But they don't want that to be true, so they "forget" it.
Everybody please post on Twitter tommorrow. The libs are trying to boycott for a day to screw Musk. Can't let that happen. Post on X and make a commie cry.
Twitter no longer exists. Deleted the app from my phone (not that I was using it these days) when it became an "X".
"What we now know, quite frankly, is that the President has been lying...I think this is shaping up to be one of the greatest corruption scandals in the history of Washington, and that is saying a lot." - Jonathan Turley (Professor, George Washington Law School)
What igloo conveniently fails to tell you is that was stated US Policy because that prosecutor Shokin was corrupt AF and in the tank for Pootey. Also EU policy as well. They hope you forget that important detail and think this was private wheeling and dealing. Which it wasn't.
Daniel Goldman @danielsgoldman I just left the interview of Devon Archer and I was the only member who stayed for the whole time. These are the facts: 1) Archer testified that Joe Biden NEVER discussed any business with Hunter and his associates. 2) there was no bribe from Burisma to Joe or Hunter.
Sigh, just sigh. I almost fell asleep reading the article but here is a synopsis of the bombshell testimony:
-----
The associate, Devon Archer, said that Joe Biden and his son never discussed business on these calls, only engaging in casual conversation.
The younger Biden would occasionally put his father on speakerphone at business dinners.
The testimony also indicates that it wasn’t always clear that Joe Biden was even aware that he was on speakerphone with Hunter Biden’s associates. “Hunter would put his father on speakerphone with whomever was at dinner and there was no indication that he had any idea who was at dinner”.
Rep. Andy Biggs ,a Republican from Arizona, another member of Oversight, said Archer testified that only pleasantries were exchanged when Joe Biden was on the phone.
This thread is actually a waste of time. Joe is done. Cognitively impaired, weird behavior, never around, corrupt. Biden will not be running in 2024.
Objectively speaking, I really can't see how Biden can beat these charges even under the liberals' alleged "presumption of innocents" standard. Biden had pecuniary motive, he had opportunity, we know he has the $5 million ensconced, we now have blatant evidence he was talking to the co-conspirators about the bribes, and we even have photos of Biden with the co-conspirators. He has no answer for his whereabouts during the time of the photographs. In fact, we also know he had multiple secret meetings with Obama at the SAME time he was getting the $5 million business bribes from the Hunter co-conspirators.
Connect the dots. This is a slam dunk for the prosecutors. You could get some bozo-ass first year law grad schmuckster to win the case of USA v. Biden. Anyone could do it. The evidence speaks for itself.
This thread is actually a waste of time. Joe is done. Cognitively impaired, weird behavior, never around, corrupt. Biden will not be running in 2024.
Objectively speaking, I really can't see how Biden can beat these charges even under the liberals' alleged "presumption of innocents" standard. Biden had pecuniary motive, he had opportunity, we know he has the $5 million ensconced, we now have blatant evidence he was talking to the co-conspirators about the bribes, and we even have photos of Biden with the co-conspirators. He has no answer for his whereabouts during the time of the photographs. In fact, we also know he had multiple secret meetings with Obama at the SAME time he was getting the $5 million business bribes from the Hunter co-conspirators.
Connect the dots. This is a slam dunk for the prosecutors. You could get some bozo-ass first year law grad schmuckster to win the case of USA v. Biden. Anyone could do it. The evidence speaks for itself.
I’m a never Trumper and believe Trump shoulcc do be prosecuted for trying to corrupt and overturn the last election.
That said, I hope Biden is investigated more seriously and effectively. It’s simply wrong for a politician and/or his family to be taking large sums of money from foreign entities for influence peddling. I wish it were, but I don’t think it is, a slam dunk case.