Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

The last few pages are a classic case of when trolling goes bad.

Silliest of Willies wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

He is a pitbull. He just might be a criminal one. We will see where this goes. No person is worthy of blind following or respect. Abusing women is something that removes respect for me, so we will see what the evidence shows.

Wait- so you're cool with waiting for evidence here for an anti-Trump individual, but not for Judge Kavanaugh? (Who has since been confirmed, after you predicted he would NOT be confirmed on the day of silly girl's testimony.)

I thought all women must be believed at all times? Hmm.

Yeah, you guys are totally reasonable and not driven by TDS at all (.....huge eyeroll.....).

We would love to have waited for a thorough investigation in the Kavanaugh matter. That's what Dems were screaming about. Were you not paying attention?

There has been a lot of back and forth whether Trump was the target or the subject of the investigation.

He is currently not the target but he is the subject.

Fat hurts wrote:

Silliest of Willies wrote:

Wait- so you're cool with waiting for evidence here for an anti-Trump individual, but not for Judge Kavanaugh? (Who has since been confirmed, after you predicted he would NOT be confirmed on the day of silly girl's testimony.)

I thought all women must be believed at all times? Hmm.

Yeah, you guys are totally reasonable and not driven by TDS at all (.....huge eyeroll.....).

We would love to have waited for a thorough investigation in the Kavanaugh matter. That's what Dems were screaming about. Were you not paying attention?

If you didn't notice, there was a thorough investigation o the Kavanaugh matter.

The Right thing to Do wrote:

L L wrote:

I see that as a general difference between Democrat supporters and Republican supporters.

Democrats will generally stop supporting one of their own if they do something wrong. Republicans defend them to the death.

Dems weren't proud of Bill Clinton's behavior. He was wrong to mess with an intern. They threw Al Freanken under the bus.

Took down Blagojevich. (Then Trump put him on The Apprentice and spoke of commuting his corruption sentence. Trump loves corruption).

Republicans will defend all of Trump's actions.

They re-elected Republican Duncan Hunter in California who has been indicted on corruption charges.

They re-elected Republican Chris Collins in New York who has been indicted on insider trading charges.

The Christian beliefs of Republicans make them more forgiving are are willing to give people grace. Hate the sin ,but forgive the sinner.

If only that were true and if only that were their motivation for backing a criminal serial liar. People are afforded forgiveness when they ask for forgiveness and admit their wrongdoings. Trump, a supposed Christian (he ISN'T one), has said he doesn't ever need to ask God for forgiveness because he doesn't believe he has ever done anything wrong. I don't care if he is a Christian or not, but I do care about him lying about it.

This is not a person to heap forgiveness on, and you know that's not what's going on with regard to him anyway.

Noticer of Things wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

We would love to have waited for a thorough investigation in the Kavanaugh matter. That's what Dems were screaming about. Were you not paying attention?

If you didn't notice, there was a thorough investigation o the Kavanaugh matter.

You are a funny guy.

Democratic politicians only threw Franken under the bus because it would have been political suicide to side with him when the #metoo movement was gaining momentum.

To say otherwise is disingenuous.

Many liberal posters on this board defended Franken and said he did nothing wrong.

Fat hurts wrote:

Noticer of Things wrote:

If you didn't notice, there was a thorough investigation o the Kavanaugh matter.

You are a funny guy.

What else would you like to have seen looked into?

Icarus. wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

He is a pitbull. He just might be a criminal one. We will see where this goes. No person is worthy of blind following or respect. Abusing women is something that removes respect for me, so we will see what the evidence shows.

So you do regret following him so blindly? It took a lot of guts to admit that.

I have never followed him "blindly". I NEVER do that. I didn't even "follow" him. I have not supported his potential bid for the Democrat nomination for President. I have ONLY said that he was bringing out the truth about Trump and Cohen and payments to Daniels and McDougal, and that remains true. I have respected his tenacity with regard to these issues and I do like the results of his work so far, but, even before this arrest, I said he didn't provide the goods with regard to Kavanaugh like he promised. I am VERY capable of losing respect for anyone based on their behavior. Right now, the jury is still out with regard to Avenatti. He says he didn't do anything wrong. So far we don't have enough information to make a decision. With Trump, we have boatloads of information to know what and who he is.

AND, I disagree that it takes a lot of guts to admit that you have lost respect for someone IF they are found guilty of abusing women. That's how people SHOULD react to that.

This is the sort of thing that could end trump and Trumpism: more and more data about the election are coming out, and they show Trump is a yuge liability to normal republicans. Sure he helps the crazies, but he is killing the party among anyone under 40, all women, and all college people. He single handedly brought Texas into play for the 2020 electoral college.

Repubs will start to understand this and push back against trump. It's already happening, I believe.

The problem is the republican primary system - it will attack non-trump repubs.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/15/opinion/texas-trump-blue-red-beto.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage

Noticer of Things wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

You are a funny guy.

What else would you like to have seen looked into?

For starters, they should have brought more witnesses before the committee.

The FBI investigation was hamstrung by the White House. They didn't verify the timeline. They didn't check Mark Judge's employment records at the Safeway. They didn't interview the witnesses that were named by the victims. And when it came time to review the report, 100 senators were forced to share a single copy and given a very limited amount of time to see it.

The whole thing was rushed to get it jammed through before the midterms.

Like I said, Democrats would have loved to see all the facts come out. But there was nothing resembling due process in that whole affair. As a result, we probably put a rapist on the Supreme Court.

So when does this tax cut start paying for itself? Deficit back up to recession-level numbers...

Noticer of Things wrote:

If you didn't notice, there was a thorough investigation o the Kavanaugh matter.

Since you failed to notice, there was NO thorough investigation O'Kavanaugh.

Silliest of Willies wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

He is a pitbull. He just might be a criminal one. We will see where this goes. No person is worthy of blind following or respect. Abusing women is something that removes respect for me, so we will see what the evidence shows.

Wait- so you're cool with waiting for evidence here for an anti-Trump individual, but not for Judge Kavanaugh?

I thought all women must be believed at all times? Hmm.

Yeah, you guys are totally reasonable and not driven by TDS at all (.....huge eyeroll.....).

1) I have never said all women must be believed at all times, and I do not believe that.

2) I was all for waiting for evidence for Kavanaugh. I wanted them to interview all witnesses and declared victims, and they did not.

3) So, you are applying things to me that I do not believe and never said.

4) I am fair and just and reasonable at all times with anyone. I have said several times that as we sit here today that I remain WRONG that Trump could not win the 2016 election. I will not flip that to RIGHT until we have the final Mueller report that shows he or his staff conspired with Russia to win the election, so I am always all about waiting until we have some facts. We DON'T right now have enough information about Avenatti to know if he is guilty or not. We DO have enough information right now to know that Trump and his staff are guilty of at least some things. I do of course PREDICT that he will feel the wrath. No info on Avenatti to make a prediction one way or the other.

"The Republicans don't win and that's because of potentially illegal votes... I've had friends talk about it when people get in line that have absolutely no right to vote and they go around in circles. Sometimes they go to their car, put on a different hat, put on a different shirt, come in and vote again." -DJT See, Trump sounds like a demented, drunk uncle who has no idea how the voting process works, but he is actually playing 3-D chess. The libs just don't get it. LOL!

Under the Bus wrote:

Democratic politicians only threw Franken under the bus because it would have been political suicide to side with him when the #metoo movement was gaining momentum.

Exactly! They threw him under the bus because their supporters demanded it. Republican voters don't demand their leaders be held accountable for their actions. They could care less. That's the difference. The base of one party is composed of people who have principles, the base of the other party is composed of nihilistic trolls.

Noticer of Things wrote:

What else would you like to have seen looked into?

Trump's obvious, and rapidly deteriorating, mental illness, and his bigly lack of qualifications to hold the job.

Harambe wrote:

So when does this tax cut start paying for itself? Deficit back up to recession-level numbers...

you know the facts so far seem to be that revenue is UP, despite the tax cuts. It's the spending that is killing us.

I imagine that if the old tax rates were still in place, the deficit would be far smaller of course...but we shouldn't think that the tax cuts caused revenue to go negative.

And it's not clear what will happen in April when people file for refunds..I suspect people kept their old withholding numbers, so many will get large refunds, reducing the tax revenue more than so far.

Fat hurts wrote:

Noticer of Things wrote:

What else would you like to have seen looked into?

For starters, they should have brought more witnesses before the committee.

The FBI investigation was hamstrung by the White House. They didn't verify the timeline. They didn't check Mark Judge's employment records at the Safeway. They didn't interview the witnesses that were named by the victims. And when it came time to review the report, 100 senators were forced to share a single copy and given a very limited amount of time to see it.

The whole thing was rushed to get it jammed through before the midterms.

Like I said, Democrats would have loved to see all the facts come out. But there was nothing resembling due process in that whole affair. As a result, we probably put a rapist on the Supreme Court.

1) More witnesses? The witness Ford said could corroborate her statements, couldn't. The other allegations were looked at by the FBI and deemed not credible. In fact, a couple of them (plus Avenetti) are in deep sh!t over it now.

2) There was no timeline to verify. Ford's lone "witness" didn't say it happened. Checking Judge's records would have done nothing help with the decision. All a smokescreen by Dems. Apparently, everyone saw that except for you.

3) There was only one alleged victim that Repubs, Dems and the FBI deemed credible. That person's witness couldn't corroborate her allegations. You didn't see Dems distancing themselves from Avenetti after he brought two allegations forward. I wonder why?

4) Everyone had enough time to read the report. It was not going to change 95+ of those Senators' minds anyway. You think it was going to change Bernie Sanders' decision. Really? And it turns out that there was no evidence of any wrongdoing by Kavanaugh in the investigative report.

5) Jammed through? When did Kavanaugh get nominated? How many hours of testimony did he give? How many hours of testimony did Ford give? The FBI conducted an investigation. they found no evidence of wrongdoing.

6) Jammed through? You don't think it was a stall tactic by Dems? Why do you think that once it became apparent that Ford's story could not be corroborated and the other allegations were found to be not credible that Dems changed tactics to say he was a drunk and that he was too much of a hothead? It's because Plan A had failed.

7) Stop watching MSNBC , CNN and opinion pieces. Broaden your horizons. You need to open your eyes.

It's "couldn't care less."