greyzones wrote:
dhe8282uehdh wrote:
This is another topic that has lost all nuance and has become black and white. It is not. I'm conflicted myself.
I'm 100% for trans rights. They should be recognized as the gender they request, shouldn't be discriminated against in school, employment, or legally.
At the same time I recognize that there are biological advantages they have that makes it unfair, in the realm of physical competition, to allow them to compete against biological females
Believing that trans females don't belong in the woman's division of sport isn't the same as saying they aren't legitimate females.
Agree, and think many who are silent have this take.
Trans people are discriminated against, and their lives are highly politicized. Unfortunately this means that a nuanced take is hard to come by, and even if one is offered it is quickly slotted into the black/white binary. This is why many people with more nuanced beliefs do not speak about it - they know their beliefs will be misrepresented. I know this is the case for myself.
I think it is important to be clear on why we have categories (age, sex, disability) in sport, and that the rationale for this is very context dependent. In some contexts (eg. community sport), the purpose is more participatory. The goal is to be inclusive, socialize, get fit, improve oneself. Thus, categories such as age, sex, disability are less important. This is self-evident; competitions are often mixed. There is some notion of fairness sometimes (eg. min number of women during active play in mixed team sports, individual awards based on sex as in a road race), but overall the result is not the most important thing. In these situations, it is clear that trans athletes should compete as they wish and not be excluded or subjected to conditions about how their body is. I don't agree that it's trivial for a trans person to compete in their sex category if they are opposed to this (degrading, possibly unsafe depending on country), and I don't think that the drug/surgery requirements are trivial either (access issues, may want to be able to have kids, sexual pleasure, adverse medical issues from hormone therapy). Sports are socially and culturally important and no one should be made to feel unwelcome or unable to participate safely. Where possible (eg. individual sports) having non-binary categories is a good idea; have seen some road races do this and think it is positive.
In more elite contexts (Olympics, pro leagues), the result is more important; we are attempting to reward excellence and it is understood that certain characteristics such as sex, disability, age have a tremendous, systemic (any sport) impact on results Nobody has a particular right to be an elite athlete nor to a particular classification in elite sport. For example, from a legal perspective I am classified as disabled in most countries as I have an autoimmune disease. However, I am not eligible to compete in the Paralympics because it has been decided that my medical condition does not have so considerable an impact on my ability to do sports that I should need a different category. Though my condition is no doubt a disadvantage in sport on average, I would agree that it is not so extensive that I should need separate classification. It is already established that one's legal or social classification does not necessarily need to match one's elite sport classification. Thus I think for elite sports it is fair to impose rules on sex classification in a similar way.
Where the murky part lies is what is in the in-between areas. I'd lean towards post-secondary leagues like the NCAA being more on the elite side since there is money involved even if it is indirect (scholarships). High school, even though it could be elite in some cases, should probably be left out - trans kids may not be able to access gender affirming treatment and so shouldn't be excluded on that basis, and the purpose of HS sports on the elite side is mostly for recruiting to higher leagues (ie. trans kids wouldn't be displacing anyone). In elementary school/younger kids sex doesn't matter very much since most haven't hit puberty and at this level it should be about participation and skill development.
At any rate, the athlete in question is following the NCAA rules and does not deserve any hate. You can disagree with the rules, but she had done nothing wrong and is not a bad person for doing what she is allowed to do.