If your county is dire need of a new election supervisor, then you can have this one. I want her gone from my area.
https://www.sun-sentinel.com/opinion/editorials/fl-op-editorial-snipes-20181110-story.html
If your county is dire need of a new election supervisor, then you can have this one. I want her gone from my area.
https://www.sun-sentinel.com/opinion/editorials/fl-op-editorial-snipes-20181110-story.html
Awsi Dooger wrote:
Trollminator wrote: I’ll give trump credit for one thing, as dumb as he is he realized there are plenty of people who are much more dumb and gullible on top of it. The money he really earned was from reality TV, which is perfect for him - get people hooked on watching him do his “you’re fired” routine with a fresh crowd of idiots fighting for a meaningless internship in his fraudulent enterprise. The next natural step was duping Americans more directly. He probably still can’t believe how much the birthed thing stuck.
Exactly. Short sound bite lies to his simplistic angry male base. He has an endless supply of them and doesn't care how many contradict each other.
The caliber of Republicans/conservatives in this era makes all of it possible. None of the prior standards apply.
Anyway, Republicans managed basically 46% nationwide, although that will drop below 46% as California is finalized.
That is what they have become, the 46% party, as I emphasized here and numerous other sites. The handful of sharp conservatives exited 2016 focused on that 46% while understanding how ominous it was, wondering how in heck they managed only 46% against Hillary Clinton? The simplistic angry males (SAMs) like the ones who post here and on so many other sites were braindead toward the 46% and somehow believed they were a beloved party.
I guess they thought that every Republican nationwide would own that electoral college button...yes, I'd prefer to lose by more than 2% and still win...thank you very much.
Anyway, I won everything I wagered on at Predictit. I wagered on Republicans far more often than not, for simple reason that the polling and therefore the odds tends to understate their chances in states with high number of conservatives. Beto is fantastic but he's not going to win in a Texas electorate with 43 or 44% conservatives. Same thing in Tennessee, which is indeed the new Alaska in terms of inept polling model, always badly overstating the Democrat. I have a Las Vegas friend who won the largest political wager of his life on Blackburn. His argument for 2 years always made perfect sense, that Tennessee stopped being polled frequently after 2006 when it turned more red, and now the polling that has resumed there is using an old flawed model that does not represent the state. He focused on 2016 polling with Trump supposedly leading by 9-11 point in Tennessee. He carried that state by 26. Same thing played out this time in the Bredesen/Blackburn race. I believe I mentioned that stuff here but it's been a while. I posted it on many sites. Blackburn doubled her poll margin, just like Trump did.
My favorite outcome was on a Democrat here in FL-27. Right wing geniuses on Predictit pushed Donna Shalala all the way down from 90 cents to briefly the underdog. I told them they were stupid, that it was one thing to have a race tighter than expected, but quite another to go all the way over the top in a district with this type of slant. Shalala won by 6 points, thank you very much.
Florida statewide was a disappointment but as I've emphasized the Republicans really have their act together here. I see it in my neighborhood all the time, the onslaught of canvassing and voter outreach. The GOP was fortifying this state throughout the past two years while Democrats pretended they could wait until after the primary and then cram like a school test. I heard from Donna Shalala every day for months, by email. Her campaign also texted me many times, and I got calls from the campaign in both the primary season and the general election. Contrast to the Gillum and Nelson campaign. They never contacted me once.
This is exactly the opposite of what I experienced living in Las Vegas and Henderson. Democrats dominate the GOTV sophistication and energy there. I saw it begin in 2004 and especially 2006. No surprise what that state has become. Granted, it is simple for Democrats in Nevada because all you have to do is dictate Clark County and you dictate the state. Florida is exponentially more complex.
The midterm electorate is much older than presidential years. For example, 75% of Florida's electorate was 45+, compared to only 60% at 45+ in 2016. Even in Texas despite Beto's push there was a change to considerably older electorate, with 61% at 45+ compared to only 53% at 45+ in 2016.
That type of thing was true throughout the country. Democratic strongholds like minorities and single women and young voters don't show up in midterms. They increased from disaster 2014 but I have no idea why anyone compares to 2014. The comparison needs to be to pro-red demographics, which rose even more and saved countless seats for Republicans.
Given this type of slant from independents, and in a presidential-type electorate, the Republican Party would have been wiped out. Beto certainly wins in Texas given the presidential electorate from 2016. Both Florida races go to the Democrats with 60% at age 45+ instead of 75% at 45+. And so forth. The House net would have been closer to 60 than 40.
I am simply giving you political math that others ignore, or don't understand. You'll never see this type of analysis on a right wing site, because they are still celebrating the 46%.
However, there is almost no chance that 2020 will see the same type of slant from independents that 2018 featured. Those independent voters have a long history of punishing a president in his first midterm, and then returning to allow benefit of a doubt two years later. That's why dunce analysts are always fooled, like Republicans in 2010 asking, "What possibly could change in 2012?"
The change is that situational dynamic of incumbent whose party has been in power only one term. Donald Trump enjoys that edge in 2020 and only Jimmy Carter has lost in that scenario in more than a century. For Democrats to prevail, Trump's approval rating needs to remain in this 42-44 range, and the Democratic nominee has to be charismatic and tefloned.
I think Trump's approval will continue to rise, minus some type of economic decline. The economy wasn't much of a topic this time but will be front and center in 2020.
Interesting summary.
L L wrote:
Any predictions on when the impeachment vote will happen?
Never.
BREAKING
InfoWars nut jobs and rightwing conspiracy kooks are rushing to Florida to stop the votes from being counted
"Roger Stone Cheers as Conspiracists Descend on a Florida Election, Again, to Stop ‘Radical Leftists’ From Counting Votes"
I say the vote happens Feb 2.
Groundhog's Day, which is a Saturday in 2019.
Kavanaugh was confirmed on a Saturday.
For historical perspective, Clinton was impeached Dec 19, 1998.
Republicans had the House majority before the November midterms.
The Democrats picked up 5 seats but the Republicans still had the majority.
The Senate trial began Jan 7, 1999.
The acquittal vote was Feb 12, 1999.
The reason I have the vote rather early is because the fear of Trump acting more and more irrationally leading up to this vote.
Morans 4 tRump wrote:
BREAKING
InfoWars nut jobs and rightwing conspiracy kooks are rushing to Florida to stop the votes from being counted
"Roger Stone Cheers as Conspiracists Descend on a Florida Election, Again, to Stop ‘Radical Leftists’ From Counting Votes"
https://www.thedailybeast.com/roger-stone-cheers-as-conspiracists-descend-on-a-florida-election-again-to-stop-radical-leftists-from-counting-votes
Is there any doubt Gary is in the mix?
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
If your county is dire need of a new election supervisor, then you can have this one. I want her gone from my area.
https://www.sun-sentinel.com/opinion/editorials/fl-op-editorial-snipes-20181110-story.html
No thanks - reforms should have been demanded from your Republican leaders over the last 20 years, but I guess it has just been too for the GOP to have such a “problem”
not a leftist wrote:
L L wrote:
Any predictions on when the impeachment vote will happen?
Never.
I'm guessing "never" as well. Democrats would be foolish to impeach unless there are enough votes in the senate for a conviction. And I just don't see that happening.
It is entirely possible that Democrats are foolish enough to try it. I'm sure they will be under a lot of pressure.
But a better course of action is to simply hold hearings and expose everything. Then Tiny can be voted out of office in 2020. Then Tiny will refuse to leave because he says the election was rigged. Then Tiny can be thrown into prison where he belongs.
Remember, there are only four ways an authoritarian like Tiny leaves office:
1. Die in office
2. Thrown in prison
3. Flee to exile
4. Taken out back and shot
Most of you thought I was crazy the first time I said that. "Surely that can't happen in America", you thought. But I bet some of you are starting to see it my way.
The Whitaker thing is an obvious tell. Tiny did not try to pick the best man for our country. He picked Whitaker purely for his own self preservation. He will desperately cling to power no matter what it takes.
Trollminator wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Another screw-up by Brenda Snipes.
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/broward/article221452655.htmlWho is in charge of running elections in your home state?
We a have a Chief Election Officer for the state, but that person does not have the administrative duty to fire a county election election supervisor. My guess that responsibility would be under the Secretary of State, I'm not sure of that either. The previous Broward Election Supervisor to Snipes was Mirium Oliphant, who was fired by then GovJeb Bush. Oliphant was terrible,- she hired cronies, over spent her budget by millions to the point that her employees could be paid. Then Jeb appointed Brenda Snipes- we all believed that she would clean up the department. Nope- she was worse. We have had over 18 years of incompetent election supervisors in Broward. This has got to stop. We are the laughingstock of the US when it comes to national elections. It is a total joke.
To answer your question, Rick Scott should have fired her in May of this year after she was sanctioned by a judge for destroying ballots in 2016. Snipes needs to go, now.
https://dos.myflorida.com/elections/about-us/Correction: could NOT be paid.
Fat hurts wrote:
But a better course of action is to simply hold hearings and expose everything. Then Tiny can be voted out of office in 2020. Then Tiny will refuse to leave because he says the election was rigged. Then Tiny can be thrown into prison where he belongs.
Exactly
The Whitaker thing is an obvious tell. Tiny did not try to pick the best man for our country. He picked Whitaker purely for his own self preservation. He will desperately cling to power no matter what it takes.
Exactly.
Will be interested in seeing if the investigation gets shut down/defunded prior to Mueller indicting Roger Stone and Donald Jr. which is going to happen in the near future.
That is Whitaker's purpose but, of course, POTUS denies knowing him despite being in multiple meetings with him in the past.
Awsi Dooger wrote:
Trollminator wrote: I’ll give trump credit for one thing, as dumb as he is he realized there are plenty of people who are much more dumb and gullible on top of it. The money he really earned was from reality TV, which is perfect for him - get people hooked on watching him do his “you’re fired” routine with a fresh crowd of idiots fighting for a meaningless internship in his fraudulent enterprise. The next natural step was duping Americans more directly. He probably still can’t believe how much the birthed thing stuck.
Exactly. Short sound bite lies to his simplistic angry male base. He has an endless supply of them and doesn't care how many contradict each other.
The caliber of Republicans/conservatives in this era makes all of it possible. None of the prior standards apply.
Anyway, Republicans managed basically 46% nationwide, although that will drop below 46% as California is finalized.
That is what they have become, the 46% party, as I emphasized here and numerous other sites. The handful of sharp conservatives exited 2016 focused on that 46% while understanding how ominous it was, wondering how in heck they managed only 46% against Hillary Clinton? The simplistic angry males (SAMs) like the ones who post here and on so many other sites were braindead toward the 46% and somehow believed they were a beloved party.
I guess they thought that every Republican nationwide would own that electoral college button...yes, I'd prefer to lose by more than 2% and still win...thank you very much.
Anyway, I won everything I wagered on at Predictit. I wagered on Republicans far more often than not, for simple reason that the polling and therefore the odds tends to understate their chances in states with high number of conservatives. Beto is fantastic but he's not going to win in a Texas electorate with 43 or 44% conservatives. Same thing in Tennessee, which is indeed the new Alaska in terms of inept polling model, always badly overstating the Democrat. I have a Las Vegas friend who won the largest political wager of his life on Blackburn. His argument for 2 years always made perfect sense, that Tennessee stopped being polled frequently after 2006 when it turned more red, and now the polling that has resumed there is using an old flawed model that does not represent the state. He focused on 2016 polling with Trump supposedly leading by 9-11 point in Tennessee. He carried that state by 26. Same thing played out this time in the Bredesen/Blackburn race. I believe I mentioned that stuff here but it's been a while. I posted it on many sites. Blackburn doubled her poll margin, just like Trump did.
My favorite outcome was on a Democrat here in FL-27. Right wing geniuses on Predictit pushed Donna Shalala all the way down from 90 cents to briefly the underdog. I told them they were stupid, that it was one thing to have a race tighter than expected, but quite another to go all the way over the top in a district with this type of slant. Shalala won by 6 points, thank you very much.
Florida statewide was a disappointment but as I've emphasized the Republicans really have their act together here. I see it in my neighborhood all the time, the onslaught of canvassing and voter outreach. The GOP was fortifying this state throughout the past two years while Democrats pretended they could wait until after the primary and then cram like a school test. I heard from Donna Shalala every day for months, by email. Her campaign also texted me many times, and I got calls from the campaign in both the primary season and the general election. Contrast to the Gillum and Nelson campaign. They never contacted me once.
This is exactly the opposite of what I experienced living in Las Vegas and Henderson. Democrats dominate the GOTV sophistication and energy there. I saw it begin in 2004 and especially 2006. No surprise what that state has become. Granted, it is simple for Democrats in Nevada because all you have to do is dictate Clark County and you dictate the state. Florida is exponentially more complex.
The midterm electorate is much older than presidential years. For example, 75% of Florida's electorate was 45+, compared to only 60% at 45+ in 2016. Even in Texas despite Beto's push there was a change to considerably older electorate, with 61% at 45+ compared to only 53% at 45+ in 2016.
That type of thing was true throughout the country. Democratic strongholds like minorities and single women and young voters don't show up in midterms. They increased from disaster 2014 but I have no idea why anyone compares to 2014. The comparison needs to be to pro-red demographics, which rose even more and saved countless seats for Republicans.
Given this type of slant from independents, and in a presidential-type electorate, the Republican Party would have been wiped out. Beto certainly wins in Texas given the presidential electorate from 2016. Both Florida races go to the Democrats with 60% at age 45+ instead of 75% at 45+. And so forth. The House net would have been closer to 60 than 40.
I am simply giving you political math that others ignore, or don't understand. You'll never see this type of analysis on a right wing site, because they are still celebrating the 46%.
However, there is almost no chance that 2020 will see the same type of slant from independents that 2018 featured. Those independent voters have a long history of punishing a president in his first midterm, and then returning to allow benefit of a doubt two years later. That's why dunce analysts are always fooled, like Republicans in 2010 asking, "What possibly could change in 2012?"
The change is that situational dynamic of incumbent whose party has been in power only one term. Donald Trump enjoys that edge in 2020 and only Jimmy Carter has lost in that scenario in more than a century. For Democrats to prevail, Trump's approval rating needs to remain in this 42-44 range, and the Democratic nominee has to be charismatic and tefloned.
I think Trump's approval will continue to rise, minus some type of economic decline. The economy wasn't much of a topic this time but will be front and center in 2020.
I just don’t see how he wins MI, WI or PA again as they are getting reamed by his tariff war. Forget FL....MI, WI and PA will flip back to a sane likable Dem candidate.
Alan
Fat hurts wrote:
With regard to the Broward County ballot, everyone needs to understand that user interface design is really, really hard. If you study human factors in UI design, the first thing you learn is that people vary widely in the way they perceive the world. Human psychology is extremely diverse.
So, a user interface that is perfectly intuitive to one person can be completely bewildering to another. And it has nothing to do with intelligence. If you have ever struggled to understand a new computer program (and we all have), then you know what I mean. The designer thought it made perfect sense, but it was not what you were expecting.
The first principle in UI design is that it is NEVER the user's fault. It's the designer's job to make the interface easy to understand for all users. And if the user doesn't know what to do, then it is 100% the fault of the designer.
In Broward, somebody created a really horrendous design. Perhaps it was on purpose. We will probably never know.
Instructional Design is the career path for someone who wants to learn to correctly design under interfaces. The proper design means that the design must be properly planned for, and tested on users, before something is released for use. In Florida the failure is all on Rick Scott. He is in charge of overseeing the election in Broward because prior Republicans running the state did not trust that highly democrat county. It is obvious that one of two things happen. That Rick Scott failed to test the UI, meaning he is negligent. Or, more likely, that Rick Scott had someone intentionally design a faulty UI, meaning he needs to go to jail.
Runningart2004 wrote:
Awsi Dooger wrote:
Exactly. Short sound bite lies to his simplistic angry male base. He has an endless supply of them and doesn't care how many contradict each other.
The caliber of Republicans/conservatives in this era makes all of it possible. None of the prior standards apply.
Anyway, Republicans managed basically 46% nationwide, although that will drop below 46% as California is finalized.
That is what they have become, the 46% party, as I emphasized here and numerous other sites. The handful of sharp conservatives exited 2016 focused on that 46% while understanding how ominous it was, wondering how in heck they managed only 46% against Hillary Clinton? The simplistic angry males (SAMs) like the ones who post here and on so many other sites were braindead toward the 46% and somehow believed they were a beloved party.
I guess they thought that every Republican nationwide would own that electoral college button...yes, I'd prefer to lose by more than 2% and still win...thank you very much.
Anyway, I won everything I wagered on at Predictit. I wagered on Republicans far more often than not, for simple reason that the polling and therefore the odds tends to understate their chances in states with high number of conservatives. Beto is fantastic but he's not going to win in a Texas electorate with 43 or 44% conservatives. Same thing in Tennessee, which is indeed the new Alaska in terms of inept polling model, always badly overstating the Democrat. I have a Las Vegas friend who won the largest political wager of his life on Blackburn. His argument for 2 years always made perfect sense, that Tennessee stopped being polled frequently after 2006 when it turned more red, and now the polling that has resumed there is using an old flawed model that does not represent the state. He focused on 2016 polling with Trump supposedly leading by 9-11 point in Tennessee. He carried that state by 26. Same thing played out this time in the Bredesen/Blackburn race. I believe I mentioned that stuff here but it's been a while. I posted it on many sites. Blackburn doubled her poll margin, just like Trump did.
My favorite outcome was on a Democrat here in FL-27. Right wing geniuses on Predictit pushed Donna Shalala all the way down from 90 cents to briefly the underdog. I told them they were stupid, that it was one thing to have a race tighter than expected, but quite another to go all the way over the top in a district with this type of slant. Shalala won by 6 points, thank you very much.
Florida statewide was a disappointment but as I've emphasized the Republicans really have their act together here. I see it in my neighborhood all the time, the onslaught of canvassing and voter outreach. The GOP was fortifying this state throughout the past two years while Democrats pretended they could wait until after the primary and then cram like a school test. I heard from Donna Shalala every day for months, by email. Her campaign also texted me many times, and I got calls from the campaign in both the primary season and the general election. Contrast to the Gillum and Nelson campaign. They never contacted me once.
This is exactly the opposite of what I experienced living in Las Vegas and Henderson. Democrats dominate the GOTV sophistication and energy there. I saw it begin in 2004 and especially 2006. No surprise what that state has become. Granted, it is simple for Democrats in Nevada because all you have to do is dictate Clark County and you dictate the state. Florida is exponentially more complex.
The midterm electorate is much older than presidential years. For example, 75% of Florida's electorate was 45+, compared to only 60% at 45+ in 2016. Even in Texas despite Beto's push there was a change to considerably older electorate, with 61% at 45+ compared to only 53% at 45+ in 2016.
That type of thing was true throughout the country. Democratic strongholds like minorities and single women and young voters don't show up in midterms. They increased from disaster 2014 but I have no idea why anyone compares to 2014. The comparison needs to be to pro-red demographics, which rose even more and saved countless seats for Republicans.
Given this type of slant from independents, and in a presidential-type electorate, the Republican Party would have been wiped out. Beto certainly wins in Texas given the presidential electorate from 2016. Both Florida races go to the Democrats with 60% at age 45+ instead of 75% at 45+. And so forth. The House net would have been closer to 60 than 40.
I am simply giving you political math that others ignore, or don't understand. You'll never see this type of analysis on a right wing site, because they are still celebrating the 46%.
However, there is almost no chance that 2020 will see the same type of slant from independents that 2018 featured. Those independent voters have a long history of punishing a president in his first midterm, and then returning to allow benefit of a doubt two years later. That's why dunce analysts are always fooled, like Republicans in 2010 asking, "What possibly could change in 2012?"
The change is that situational dynamic of incumbent whose party has been in power only one term. Donald Trump enjoys that edge in 2020 and only Jimmy Carter has lost in that scenario in more than a century. For Democrats to prevail, Trump's approval rating needs to remain in this 42-44 range, and the Democratic nominee has to be charismatic and tefloned.
I think Trump's approval will continue to rise, minus some type of economic decline. The economy wasn't much of a topic this time but will be front and center in 2020.
I just don’t see how he wins MI, WI or PA again as they are getting reamed by his tariff war. Forget FL....MI, WI and PA will flip back to a sane likable Dem candidate.
Alan
Kasich will seem much more palatable in 2020 for midwestern and PA republicans
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
This is actual election fraud in Broward County. Ballots being illegally transported at night, finding new ballots in closets, all of this needs to be criminally investigated. The judge's deadline has passed as of 7PM ET last night and now Snipes refuses to comply with court order to allow inspection. She needs to be fired.
Rick Scott is in charge of overseeing the election on Broward County.
Runningart2004 wrote:
Awsi Dooger wrote:
Exactly. Short sound bite lies to his simplistic angry male base. He has an endless supply of them and doesn't care how many contradict each other.
The caliber of Republicans/conservatives in this era makes all of it possible. None of the prior standards apply.
Anyway, Republicans managed basically 46% nationwide, although that will drop below 46% as California is finalized.
That is what they have become, the 46% party, as I emphasized here and numerous other sites. The handful of sharp conservatives exited 2016 focused on that 46% while understanding how ominous it was, wondering how in heck they managed only 46% against Hillary Clinton? The simplistic angry males (SAMs) like the ones who post here and on so many other sites were braindead toward the 46% and somehow believed they were a beloved party.
I guess they thought that every Republican nationwide would own that electoral college button...yes, I'd prefer to lose by more than 2% and still win...thank you very much.
Anyway, I won everything I wagered on at Predictit. I wagered on Republicans far more often than not, for simple reason that the polling and therefore the odds tends to understate their chances in states with high number of conservatives. Beto is fantastic but he's not going to win in a Texas electorate with 43 or 44% conservatives. Same thing in Tennessee, which is indeed the new Alaska in terms of inept polling model, always badly overstating the Democrat. I have a Las Vegas friend who won the largest political wager of his life on Blackburn. His argument for 2 years always made perfect sense, that Tennessee stopped being polled frequently after 2006 when it turned more red, and now the polling that has resumed there is using an old flawed model that does not represent the state. He focused on 2016 polling with Trump supposedly leading by 9-11 point in Tennessee. He carried that state by 26. Same thing played out this time in the Bredesen/Blackburn race. I believe I mentioned that stuff here but it's been a while. I posted it on many sites. Blackburn doubled her poll margin, just like Trump did.
My favorite outcome was on a Democrat here in FL-27. Right wing geniuses on Predictit pushed Donna Shalala all the way down from 90 cents to briefly the underdog. I told them they were stupid, that it was one thing to have a race tighter than expected, but quite another to go all the way over the top in a district with this type of slant. Shalala won by 6 points, thank you very much.
Florida statewide was a disappointment but as I've emphasized the Republicans really have their act together here. I see it in my neighborhood all the time, the onslaught of canvassing and voter outreach. The GOP was fortifying this state throughout the past two years while Democrats pretended they could wait until after the primary and then cram like a school test. I heard from Donna Shalala every day for months, by email. Her campaign also texted me many times, and I got calls from the campaign in both the primary season and the general election. Contrast to the Gillum and Nelson campaign. They never contacted me once.
This is exactly the opposite of what I experienced living in Las Vegas and Henderson. Democrats dominate the GOTV sophistication and energy there. I saw it begin in 2004 and especially 2006. No surprise what that state has become. Granted, it is simple for Democrats in Nevada because all you have to do is dictate Clark County and you dictate the state. Florida is exponentially more complex.
The midterm electorate is much older than presidential years. For example, 75% of Florida's electorate was 45+, compared to only 60% at 45+ in 2016. Even in Texas despite Beto's push there was a change to considerably older electorate, with 61% at 45+ compared to only 53% at 45+ in 2016.
That type of thing was true throughout the country. Democratic strongholds like minorities and single women and young voters don't show up in midterms. They increased from disaster 2014 but I have no idea why anyone compares to 2014. The comparison needs to be to pro-red demographics, which rose even more and saved countless seats for Republicans.
Given this type of slant from independents, and in a presidential-type electorate, the Republican Party would have been wiped out. Beto certainly wins in Texas given the presidential electorate from 2016. Both Florida races go to the Democrats with 60% at age 45+ instead of 75% at 45+. And so forth. The House net would have been closer to 60 than 40.
I am simply giving you political math that others ignore, or don't understand. You'll never see this type of analysis on a right wing site, because they are still celebrating the 46%.
However, there is almost no chance that 2020 will see the same type of slant from independents that 2018 featured. Those independent voters have a long history of punishing a president in his first midterm, and then returning to allow benefit of a doubt two years later. That's why dunce analysts are always fooled, like Republicans in 2010 asking, "What possibly could change in 2012?"
The change is that situational dynamic of incumbent whose party has been in power only one term. Donald Trump enjoys that edge in 2020 and only Jimmy Carter has lost in that scenario in more than a century. For Democrats to prevail, Trump's approval rating needs to remain in this 42-44 range, and the Democratic nominee has to be charismatic and tefloned.
I think Trump's approval will continue to rise, minus some type of economic decline. The economy wasn't much of a topic this time but will be front and center in 2020.
I just don’t see how he wins MI, WI or PA again as they are getting reamed by his tariff war. Forget FL....MI, WI and PA will flip back to a sane likable Dem candidate.
Alan
Nevada and Arizona are turning blue faster than expected. A republican will never win those states again.
Fat hurts wrote:
not a leftist wrote:
Never.
I'm guessing "never" as well. Democrats would be foolish to impeach unless there are enough votes in the senate for a conviction. And I just don't see that happening.
It is entirely possible that Democrats are foolish enough to try it. I'm sure they will be under a lot of pressure.
But a better course of action is to simply hold hearings and expose everything. Then Tiny can be voted out of office in 2020. Then Tiny will refuse to leave because he says the election was rigged. Then Tiny can be thrown into prison where he belongs.
Remember, there are only four ways an authoritarian like Tiny leaves office:
1. Die in office
2. Thrown in prison
3. Flee to exile
4. Taken out back and shot
Most of you thought I was crazy the first time I said that. "Surely that can't happen in America", you thought. But I bet some of you are starting to see it my way.
The Whitaker thing is an obvious tell. Tiny did not try to pick the best man for our country. He picked Whitaker purely for his own self preservation. He will desperately cling to power no matter what it takes.
Won't be foolish for Democrats to impeach him, even if the Senate doesn't convict. They will do it if for no other reason than to add a Republican President to the list of impeached Presidents.
Can’t wait for 2020 election. That means he’s there until 2021.
Can’t afford two more years of Trump building a wall of enablers and a foundation of corruption.
Can’t let bad economic policies of tariffs tear us down.
They already have way worse things on him than what lead to the impeachment of Clinton. They had no chance of conviction then, but they proceeded with the trial.
Trump will perjure himself in the senate trial, for sure.
And not perjury about sex but perjury about illegal financial transactions.
Perjury about improper foreign communications during the election and transition.
And his financials will be opened up.
The impeachment will lead to damning public disclosure.
And his children may be in trouble.
He needs to be put on trial.
Instructional Design wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
With regard to the Broward County ballot, everyone needs to understand that user interface design is really, really hard. If you study human factors in UI design, the first thing you learn is that people vary widely in the way they perceive the world. Human psychology is extremely diverse.
So, a user interface that is perfectly intuitive to one person can be completely bewildering to another. And it has nothing to do with intelligence. If you have ever struggled to understand a new computer program (and we all have), then you know what I mean. The designer thought it made perfect sense, but it was not what you were expecting.
The first principle in UI design is that it is NEVER the user's fault. It's the designer's job to make the interface easy to understand for all users. And if the user doesn't know what to do, then it is 100% the fault of the designer.
In Broward, somebody created a really horrendous design. Perhaps it was on purpose. We will probably never know.
Instructional Design is the career path for someone who wants to learn to correctly design under interfaces. The proper design means that the design must be properly planned for, and tested on users, before something is released for use. In Florida the failure is all on Rick Scott. He is in charge of overseeing the election in Broward because prior Republicans running the state did not trust that highly democrat county. It is obvious that one of two things happen. That Rick Scott failed to test the UI, meaning he is negligent. Or, more likely, that Rick Scott had someone intentionally design a faulty UI, meaning he needs to go to jail.
Yes, testing is absolutely essential. You never know if your UI is any good until you test it on a diverse population of users.
And you are also right that those who oversaw the Broward election were probably negligent.
But I kind of doubt that most ballot designs are ever tested in a scientific way, if at all. It would be hard to convince people that Scott, or even Snipes are negligent if the accepted practice is to forego testing. And that is the real problem.
Flagpole wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
I'm guessing "never" as well. Democrats would be foolish to impeach unless there are enough votes in the senate for a conviction. And I just don't see that happening.
It is entirely possible that Democrats are foolish enough to try it. I'm sure they will be under a lot of pressure.
But a better course of action is to simply hold hearings and expose everything. Then Tiny can be voted out of office in 2020. Then Tiny will refuse to leave because he says the election was rigged. Then Tiny can be thrown into prison where he belongs.
Remember, there are only four ways an authoritarian like Tiny leaves office:
1. Die in office
2. Thrown in prison
3. Flee to exile
4. Taken out back and shot
Most of you thought I was crazy the first time I said that. "Surely that can't happen in America", you thought. But I bet some of you are starting to see it my way.
The Whitaker thing is an obvious tell. Tiny did not try to pick the best man for our country. He picked Whitaker purely for his own self preservation. He will desperately cling to power no matter what it takes.
Won't be foolish for Democrats to impeach him, even if the Senate doesn't convict. They will do it if for no other reason than to add a Republican President to the list of impeached Presidents.
It all depends on Mueller. If his report shows that the Trump Tower meeting was illegal and he likely obstructed justice then the House really has no choice. Of course most of this will be circumstantial and he said/she said and likely without Trump’s sworn testimony. If so could the House supbpoena Trump to testify under oath to the assumed accusations in a Mueller report?
Anyway, if Mueller releases his findings before the summer we will see impeachment started in the House and likely squashed in the Senate before serious 2020 campaigning begins.
Alan
Irish gymnast shows you can have sex in the "anti-sex" cardboard beds in the Olympic village (video)
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
Finishing a mountain stage in the Tour De France vs running a marathon: Which is harder?
Per sources, Colorado expected to hire NAU assistant coach Jarred Cornfield as head xc coach
George Mills' dad: "Watching athletics is the worst on the planet."