I think you should just stop digging at this point. You are making different arguments all day on different threads. And you have been trying to discredit the race since Rupp was announced for itIt was a good race - not the best race ever but it’s not a conspiracy against your website. It’s just not the best WMM. Neither is Boston or Tokyo.
rojo wrote:
Nonstop wrote:You are exacting like a fool Rojo!
How am I acting like a fool by pointing out facts? All I said was Bett led part of the race. I have no idea if he was a pacer of some sort or not. The fact that he ended up leading and then dropping out makes me think it's possible but I don't know.
Do think that's why Rupp won? No. Rupp was winning this baby no matter what happened. Before the race, I said the win odds on Rupp were shockingly low. "Crazy good odds" is what I said of the 15/2 odds.
We thought he should be one of the top betting favorites, maybe the favorite, instead of the #4 choice.
But for some reason, if I make a post that questions the greatness of the NOP or Rupp in the slightest, I'm viewed as Rupp hating fool.
Oh and let me support Rupp some more. The OP's post is wrong. He or she must have read our recap before Chicago changed the halfway splits. Rupp was one of 8 guys to negative split the race. He ran the final 5 miles all under 4:40.