Link wrote:
good for her wrote:This!
That is like Tucker saying that 20% of his class fails the course, so looking at even the brightest student he assumes a 2/10 on his "failure scale."
What idiocy.
And this guy is a professor/"expert"?
I am going to hope he is not that dumb but just desperate for attention and grabbing at sensationalist points before the Olympics dwindle away and nobody cares about his "area of expertise" for another four years.
At least he got Rupp and Mo right.
This isn't really that difficult. He means that, if someone is at the elite level, then there is at least a 30% chance (or, 3, on his scale of 10, maybe it's not linear...) that that person is doping.
Also? I see that the paid Nike shills are just as quick to respond here as ever. Good job. You're earning your blood money.
Yes. It's actually more of a scale on PED probability/chance. It's his own scale that he factors many variables. Rupp, coached by Salazar for 16 years, starting when Rump was only 14, is a 10. Do you people not think Salazar tested things out on underage Rupp? Dan Browne himself used to have teenage Rupp hanging in the OP altitude house when he was there. I think Rupp, with a 26:44 is way more a 10. I'm always reminded of Rupp running 27:10 when Chris Solinsky broke the AR. Chelanga and Salel beat Rupp. I wonder what they thought when he ran 26:48 one year later? Rupp is 10 of 10s.