No, this is not the case.
I do see race, which is why I made the distinction between African Americans and Anglo Americans. I also understand your argument.
Merely pointing out that the United States has the best track team is not sufficient for qualifying as bragging.
The term average at best, by definition, does not apply to winning medals. Some medal winners at global championships in the past include, Jeremy Warnier (OG gold, OG silver, 2 WC gold, WC silver), Deena Kastor (OG bronze), Shalane Flanagan (OG bronze [likely upgraded to silver soon], WXC bronze), Kara Goucher (WC bronze [likely upgraded to silver soon]) Jenny Simpson (WC gold, WC silver), Shannon Rowbury (WC bronze, 2 CC silvers), Emily Infeld (WC bronze), Molly Huddle (CC bronze), Emma Coburn (CC gold), Christian Wurth-Thomas (CC bronze), Galen Rupp (OG silver), Nick Symmonds (WC silver). All of the aforementioned athletes are white Americans. This list includes running events only. If one includes field and multi events, the list of white Americans would be even longer.
The claim white Americans are average at best is a universal claim. Universal claims need only one counter example to be false. I've gone far beyond that. Therefore, your claim white Americans are average at best is false.
I don't think that nor have I ever made that claim.
Again, I don't think that there are no differences between white and black Americans, nor have I ever made that claim.
This has nothing to do with your claim that white Americans should exclude African Americans when examining the success of the United States' team in track and field.
First, I'm not color-blind, nor have I ever claimed or implied that I am. I merely pointed out that African Americans are no less American than Anglo Americans, and therefore, shouldn't be excluded when examining the success of Americans in track.
Second, again, merely pointing out that the United States has the best track team is not sufficient for qualifying as bragging.
Third, since you aren't explicitly stating the point you're implying I'll state it for you. Your argument is this:
premise 1) White Americans brag that the United States has the best track team.
premise 2) The success of the United States' track team is due only to black Americans' success.
premise 3) White Americans are average at best in track.
premise 4) One ought not point out the success of a country in track unless the one pointing out the success is the same race as the person or persons who are having said success.
conclusion) Therefore, white Americans ought not include the success had by African Americans in track when examining the success of the United States' track team.
Let's examine this argument.
Premise 1 holds that white Americans brag about the success of the United States' track team. Firstly, it is a fact that the United States has the best track team. Merely pointing this out isn't sufficient to qualify as bragging. Second, it is certainly possible that pointing something out can go beyond just that and indeed, qualify as bragging, but it is not the case however that Americans, and more specifically, white Americans bragging about having the best track team happens enough to qualify as being a common occurrence that deserves remaking upon. But further, even if it is the case that any American brags that the United States has the best track team, it's true. The United States does have the best track team. Bragging about it doesn't make it untrue.
Premise 2 holds that the success of the United States' track team is due only to black Americans' success. This is not the case. See my above list of white American runners' successes. Therefore, this premise is false.
Premise 3 holds that white Americans are average at best in track. This is not the case. See my above list of white American runners' successes. Therefore, this premise is false.
Premise 4 is the premise your conclusion depends on, as well as the one you've been implying but haven't explicitly stated. This is perhaps because it has a weird racial undertone to it. Nonetheless, premise 4 holds that one ought not point out the success of a country in track unless the one pointing out the success is the same race as the person or persons who are having said success. Apart from the racial undertone, this premise is strange because it doesn't have any justification for it being the case. The United States is a multi-racial country of immigrants. African Americans are no less American than Anglo Americans, or any other Americans. There is no rational reason as to why white Americans should discount the success of African Americans when examining the success of the United States' track team, nor is there a rational reason as to why an American should discount the success of any other American in track if that American is a different race. Therefore, this premise is false.
Your conclusion is dependent upon a false premise, and therefore, your argument is unsound.
The United States doesn't like to adopt a superior attitude because the United States is a country and countries do not have attitudes.
And again, your claim that:
is false.
It would be hypocritical for American dopers (or dopers of any nationality) to criticize Russian dopers whilst pretending that they themselves do not dope.
It is not hypocritical for 99% of USA fans to criticize Russian dopers because the vast majority of USA fans are not doping, nor are they athletes.
Further, it is not hypocritical for USA fans to criticize the Russian athletics federation or Russian anti-doping agency because it's true that the Russian athletics federation and the Russian anti-doping agency has a major doping problem, one that is supported by officials within Russian Athletics and the Russian anti-doping agency. It's not hypocritical because 99% of USA fans are not officials working for USATF or USADA, and those that are do not support or cover up doping, which segues into the next point:
It's not hypocritical for USATF or USADA to issue official statements criticizing Russian Athletics or the Russian anti-doping agency because doping is not supported or covered up by either organization.
No, it was me pointing out your mistaken reasoning
When one becomes angry while discussing any particular issue such that the person starts insulting those who hold views different from his or her own, it's usually a sign that the person is unable to consider and discuss the issue rationally.