Renato Canova wrote:
I don't think some athlete has to prove he's not doped.
I think who speaks about doping, having doubts about the integrity of the athletes, has to prove they are doped.
And who not only speaks about doubts, but appears to be totally certain about the doping of an athlete, needs not only to prove it, but also to be personally responsible about what he says, because in the law of every civilized Country this behavior has a name : LIBEL.
This has to be a MUST for a democratic and civil Country.
May be the posters of Letsrun are not democratic neither civil persons.
Thank you for your post Mr. Canova. Innocent until proven guilty, as the saying goes. I just wanted to point out how absurd it is to think that Kimetto has had the opportunity to dope. Many argue from ignorance, but with the basic facts before us, it is almost self-apparent that Kimetto did not have the means to dope. Are you familiar with Kimetto's training progression? I suspect that is what we all would really like to hear about.