RE: Politics of Boston Bombing Thread

Charlie Freak wrote:

george oscar bluth wrote:

Chalk me up as a liberal who didn't give a f*ck what the perpetrator/s nationality or religion was/were - just that they were found. That so many of you think otherwise is baffling.

The reason it's baffling to you is because you're a liberal and you're thinking is messed up.

...

george oscar bluth wrote:

Chalk me up as a liberal who didn't give a f*ck what the perpetrator/s nationality or religion was/were - just that they were found. That so many of you think otherwise is baffling.

Ohsure wrote:

Well tell me this my liberal friend; would you like to know if Others are involved and they plan on attacking the NYC Marathon, Chicago? London? The White House? MSNBC, etc?

Yes, troll, obviously everyone would want to know that.

this is just poorly aimed payback for the dirty russians pillage and rape of chechnya. I dont know why the attackers did it in the united states when Russia actually deserves it. If the attackers had been iraqi, saudi, afghani, lebanese, pakistani, cuban, or palestinian it would have made sense. Chechen is just confusing.

Glad to know your only resort is uncreative ad hominem attacks and faulty reasoning.

Re-read this and try to process it properly:

"didn't give a f*ck what the perpetrator/s nationality or religion was/were - JUST THAT THEY WERE FOUND."

Read the part that I capitalized and read your "example" and try to process why your question isn't relevant.

george oscar bluth wrote:

george oscar bluth wrote:

Chalk me up as a liberal who didn't give a f*ck what the perpetrator/s nationality or religion was/were - just that they were found. That so many of you think otherwise is baffling.

Ohsure wrote:

Well tell me this my liberal friend; would you like to know if Others are involved and they plan on attacking the NYC Marathon, Chicago? London? The White House? MSNBC, etc?

Yes, troll, obviously everyone would want to know that.

Well then you have to know what nationality they are and what religion they are. These are called clues stupid fuk.

Haha, no you just don't get it. The police investigate the connections and motives of the perpetrators to determine the possibilities of other attacks, no matter what their religion or ethnicity is. It's their job.

Apparently the older brother was on lunch break from his job at the time of the bombing and the Obama admin says it is technically workplace violence.

So the terrorist attacks on American soil score is still:

Bush: 1

Obama: 0

^Another stupid liberal

Good one. What are you going to do next? Get more angry and out of touch and lose another election?

george oscar bluth wrote:

Good one. What are you going to do next? Get more angry and out of touch and lose another election?

Come on liberals. This is insulting. Please tell me there's better than this out there. Even though you're all evil you can make a better post than this. You're embarrassing yourselves. Did all the intelligent liberals run home with their tails between their legs. Think I'll go to another thread. Nothing to see here.

george oscar bluth wrote:

Glad to know your only resort is uncreative ad hominem attacks and faulty reasoning.

Re-read this and try to process it properly:

"didn't give a f*ck what the perpetrator/s nationality or religion was/were - JUST THAT THEY WERE FOUND."

Read the part that I capitalized and read your "example" and try to process why your question isn't relevant.

Oh, it was creative alright, quite relevant, and I noticed you didn't answer my question. And you still don't get it. If our armed forces, State Department, CIA, FBI and other agencies critical to defending our country only cared about "JUST THAT THEY WERE FOUND", we'd never develop defense and intelligence strategies that work.

News flash for you buddy: there is a certain group of people out there with certain characteristics who want to do America and its people harm. Religion - gasp! - is one of those characteristics. Whether you want to acknowledge it or not, radical Muslims are the primary group of people in the world that fit this description. It is well-documented that a huge part of radical Islam's strategy is to infiltrate American society, all the while planning to attack innocent Americans. To not take this into account when a terrorist sets off bombs on American soil would be dereliction of duty.

Glad you're not in charge of protecting this country.

The target just did not make sense for a militant Islamic attack. The Boston Marathon has nothing to do with the US government or military, no connection to any religion or political group and wasn't even on national TV. In fact, the Boston Marathon is dominated by E. Africans from former British colonies. The marathon is held on Patriots day, but aside from state offices and schools in Massachussetts and a few closed business and offices here and there, the holiday isn't really observed other than the running of the marathon.

But, now that we know these guys had ties to Chechnya and were at least sympathizers with the Chechen rebels, it all makes sense. The Chechen rebels are some of the most cold blooded of all the terrorist (Beslan: killing over 180 children).

So, now you can be childish and say that my team was right, yours was wrong. But that ignores the big problem. The US has piled about as much violence into the Middle East and Pakistan/Afghanistan as possible over the past twelve years. Russia makes the US look saintly with what they have done to the Chechen rebels. Yet, with all that violence, with all the fortune spent, there are still people out there who are willing to do this kind of thing to innocent civilians in the US and are able to do it.

With the exception of the fetish of invading nations and talking like a cowboy about foreign policy, Obama has pretty much been in lock step with Bush on things like enemy combatants, surveillance, drones and was probably even more aggressive than Bush in taking out bin Laden in Pakistan.

There are no obvious solutions or answers to terrorism. But, anyone who at this moment thinks that one political group comes out ahead or behind as a result of the revelation that the terrorists were Muslims is missing the bigger issue that the war on terror is futile and it is time to serious look at whether there is another way.

george oscar bluth wrote:

Good one. What are you going to do next? Get more angry and out of touch and lose another election?

uhoh! sounds like someone's upset it wasn't a white christian tax evader!

wahhhhh call the wahhhhhhmmmmmbbulance

ProfilingWorks wrote:

Both sides were just hoping it wasn't connected to the fringe parts of their brand of politics, be it right or left. Now we have a half way, kinda home grown, but kinda foreign terrorist attack and that doesnt satisfy either narrative.

Half way, home grown? WTF? Where has all the smart liberals gone? There's nothing home grown here. I want a worthy opponent. Are they all so distraught that they just packed their bags and capitulated? This is a sign. Liberalism has suffered a massive blow. They know they're doomed now. Caught red handed supporting terrorists. You should all run and hide. And Bow your heads in shame!

You lost me at "the righties have a thought process."

jf94utr49tji5kg wrote:

The righties have a different thought process than the lefites. Lefties are just glad the perps are caught, or in the process of being caught and brought to justice, and don't care whether they are Muslim, white or have stripes like a Zebra. The righties sound like the Nazi Party and want all Muslims exterminated.

I'll direct you to the Book of Deuteronomy to illustrate just how fukked up Christians are. No better than extreme Muslims.

Timothy McVeigh, Aurora shooter, etc. both incidents resulted in far more carnage than the Boston marathon, which was indeed a big tragedy. Prosecute all criminals but don't persecute all religions and political affiliations just because you don't agree with them.

Let me break it down for you further.

Situation A: Crazy cult guy kills a bunch of people with a bomb. They find him. Should they look for associations and other people in his cult? Yes. Is this profiling? I don't care.

Situation B: Crazy Muslim kills a bunch of people with a bomb. They find him. Should they look for associations and other people in his terror cell? Yes. Is this profiling? I don't care.

Situation C: Crazy hippie kills a bunch of people with a bomb. They find him. Should they look for associations and other people in his occupy group? Yes. Is this profiling? I don't care.

Situation D: Crazy anti-government kills a bunch of people with a bomb. They find him. Should they look for associations and other people in his right-wing nut group? Yes. Is this profiling? I don't care.

So, to reiterate, I didn't care what his religion or ethnicity he was. I wasn't "rooting" for him to be black, Muslim, conservative, or Buddhist. AND YES OF COURSE THEY SHOULD DO SOME F*CKING FOLLOW UP BASED ON THEIR MOTIVES. You trolls are implicating that liberals wanted him to be white or a crazy tea party goon. I was offering anecdotal evidence of that not being the case.

Galen Rupp Number on Fan wrote:

I dont know why the attackers did it in the united states when Russia actually deserves it.

Good to know there are people who think terrorism is justifiable.

I agree that Democrats are far more forgivimg of Muslim extremes, but the Rebublicans have far more in common.

george oscar bluth wrote:

Haha, no you just don't get it. The police investigate the connections and motives of the perpetrators to determine the possibilities of other attacks, no matter what their religion or ethnicity is. It's their job.

You apparently have a strong desire to remain clueless.

Luckily, the smarter of us are able to gather the clues and realize that the motive for these killings lies within the religion itself. It's not like just another muslim thug kills somebody to get his wallet.