I dont have the numbers in front of me, but I believe Feingold was the only one in the Senate who voted against the war in Iraq. That means Clinotn and Obama voted for it. The war on terror and the patriot act were passed on fear and insecurity.
I dont have the numbers in front of me, but I believe Feingold was the only one in the Senate who voted against the war in Iraq. That means Clinotn and Obama voted for it. The war on terror and the patriot act were passed on fear and insecurity.
Obama wasn't present for that vote but consistently opposed the war from the start. Dereliction of duty IMHO, I hope it wasn't politically-motivated ambivalence.
Towson exile wrote:Bush signed the most executives order and pushed through the patriot act. Either way its the same old crap in washington. The jobs are very cushy there.
Are you John Egger?
Feingold is a self-hating Jew and a Nazi collaborator.
citation needed wrote:
Obama wasn't present for that vote but consistently opposed the war from the start. Dereliction of duty IMHO, I hope it wasn't politically-motivated ambivalence.
What? I'm no Obama fan myself, but no one even knew who Obama was in 2001 -- he was three years away from a seat in the US Senate.
I stand corrected. Mixed up my elections.
Feingold the Hamas-nik wrote:
Feingold is a self-hating Jew and a Nazi collaborator.
Yes, Russ Feingold who was born on March 2nd, 1953, collaborated with Nazi Germany, whose last troops who surrendered on May 8th, 1945.
That's funny. No, I'm not Egger, but I did have him for microeconomics. It was one of the worst classes I had in college. He is a nut in my opinion.
Still though, maybe I'm not 100% correct on all my information, but I would say my statements are more observational than they are political. Geithner was discovered to be cheating/invading taxes and the lack of change in Washington was the number one complaint of Obama's first year according to the survey I saw, however, I forget which one that was.
Lets not be a political fanatic ok!
shut up wrote:
DontFeedTheTroll wrote:Firmly believe that his desire to audit the Fed stems from his desire to make the Fed worse rather than better.
You obviously don't know much about his ideas if you say he's trying to make the fed "worse" rather than better. That's the whole point... we should not have a Fed.
No kidding, Einstein. That was my point. He talks about accountability and transparency but he's not interested in either one. But he can't get any support for his real goals, so he invents fake ones.
Ron Paul is an anti-Semitic hater who collects Hitler paraphernalia and press pictures of dead Arabs and Jews, frequents NASCAR races, and drives a Ford F-150. He is nuts.
Who is dumber(er), Ron Paul...or the people who actually take his crap seriously?
Coach D wrote:
Who is dumber(er), Ron Paul...or the people who actually take his crap seriously?
The one good thing about this catastrophe is that people like you who deserve to suffer will get what's coming to them.
ugh...
You can be your own Federal Reserve and store your savings in something that has no counter party risks and is not tied to all of this madness. Why stand there while Bernake and Obama pump all remaining value out of your dollars? Gold and silver will lead you to safety if you let it.
Unfortunately, 99.9% of the population are ignorant about what real money is all about.
All I have to do going forward is figure out how to act like I am hurting and struggling when we get our currency crisis. I don't want the ignorant horde figuring out that I am well off and prepared while they were too busy being stupid. So I will need to act like them a little bit and blend in.
reality will avenge us wrote:
The one good thing about this catastrophe is that people like you who deserve to suffer will get what's coming to them.
every generation thinks they're the last.
I don't thank so, semitic people are BLACK not WHITE!!!!
You are a bunch of crazies. But don't impose your own wacko ideas on our country. We already had economic collapse under Bush. What other treats do you Republicans and Libertarians have in store for us? This hysteria is ludicrous. Obama's had a textbook Keynesian approach that, despite being maybe half the size we needed, has already transformed the economy from 6+ percent GDP decline to 5.7% increase in under a year. You never worried about the deficit until Democrats got into office. The deficit is mostly a product of the Bush tax cuts, the Bush recession, and the Bush wars. Obama inherited most of his budget deficit and what extra he spent worked extremely well. The unemployment rate will come down after several years of growth, as it did under Reagan, under whom unemployment reached 10.8% around October/November 1982, toward the end of his second year in office. You lunatics, go back into your bomb shelters and let the rest of us enjoy the next five to seven years of prosperity.
I think this became too much of a Liberal vs. conservative argument.
Ron Paul stands for something else... His ideas are not genuine, but rather passed on from a small group attempting to stop an overthrow. A lot of his ideas come from William Cooper and those before him.
Off the Grid wrote:
all nation states are...that is history....the US will not last forever. No nation ever has, or ever will...
Ethiopia has been nation or monarchy for a few thousand years, since biblical times at least.
What about Egypt?
The nation may not last in its current boundaries or organization, but I'm sure it will last in some form for quite some time.
Alan