Exactly! Dark Brandon should just go full "The Pelican Brief" and have all six conservative judges offed by official Presidential order. He's got the power and he may as well use it. Thanks, SCOTUS!
Why would Joe take out the justices? They just specifically gave him immunity to order Seal Team 6 to take out his opponent.
Don't worry we're running it back again paying moderns a sht load of money to develope a vaccine for the bird flu from which they get to pocket the profits....
There isn't another Western democracy that has a supreme court equivalent to the SCOTUS, which is simply a body of partisan political hacks.
Again with the ignorance.
Name another Western nation's top court that operates as the SCOTUS does, that has provoked the same controversy and accusations of bias and acquired the same dismal reputation amongst its citizenry, as polls now show in the US.
Exactly! Dark Brandon should just go full "The Pelican Brief" and have all six conservative judges offed by official Presidential order. He's got the power and he may as well use it. Thanks, SCOTUS!
Why would Joe take out the justices? They just specifically gave him immunity to order Seal Team 6 to take out his opponent.
Obama ordered drone strikes of US Citizens, then argued he had unlimited, un-reviewable immunity to do so, and was never punished.
Am I correct in saying that a sitting President cannot expand the SC, instead it requires approval from Congress?
No approval required by obstructions repubs in CONgress. Simply set the number of justices match the number of district courts, and add district courts to increase with population growth.
Based on caseload 9 justices are assigned to a case, with the head justice not being allowed to stack a case with only justices appointed by a Republican or Democrat.
For a case to be decided by all of the justices, 2/3rds of them would have to vote to do so.
The above solves the problem of more and more legal cases arising (greater workload) and justices being spread too thin. It also helps stop the "stacking" the courts politics which have turned the SCOTUS into a worldwide joke.
Finally, rotate justices off the SCOTUS as emeritus justices to a lower court of their choosing. Their pay remains the same as required by existing laws. Two justices assigned by each president, a third one (not two more) by a president serving a second term. The most "senior" justices rotate off.
So an immunity for criminal acts committed while in office doesn't put the president above the law? Like a king was.
DumLoper is okay with any and all crimes committed by Trump since Trump was born, until he dies. He suffers from a severe case of TDS: Trump Deity Syndrome.
Justice's dissent: 'The president is now a king above the law'
Sotomayor is a political activist pretending to be a judge.
That's actually funny. Because most legal commentators say that about the SCOTUS because of its right wing majority. Political activists for the right pretending to be judges.
Sotomayor is a political activist pretending to be a judge.
That's actually funny. Because most legal commentators say that about the SCOTUS because of its right wing majority. Political activists for the right pretending to be judges.
Leftist legal commentators.
You are so deep in the cult you can't even realize it.
You're like a fish that thinks he isn't wet because he's never even been exposed to the opposite.
Sotomayor is a political activist pretending to be a judge.
You are jamin pretending to be a fictional character who is a member of the Ministry of Truth which removes "unpersons", in your case from America.
I'm AdultInTheRoom using this name because just as Orwell predicted leftists idiots will do everything they can to silence any opinions they don't like.
Sotomayor is a political activist pretending to be a judge.
That's actually funny. Because most legal commentators say that about the SCOTUS because of its right wing majority. Political activists for the right pretending to be judges.
Perhaps partisan legal commentators say that. The originalists on the court aren't the ones finding make-believe "rights" and changing things without a constitutional amendment. Those are the partisan leftists.
Also, isn't the left that is SO concerned about the court being "politicized" the same left that lionized Ruth Bader Ginsburg (former board member and general counsel for the hyper-partisan ACLU)? The background of leftist nutbag judges must have slipped their minds when applying scrutiny. Fortunately you can't "Bork" a sitting justice and packing the court, as mentioned, isn't currently possible.