The "consistent training" in Myers' case is reportedly about 50mpw. That's schoolboy level. If any of you think that's all it takes then you haven't been following the history of the sport.
Go away. You are boring, repetitive, unoriginal and nobody likes you.
Let us enjoy the sport, Cam's results, without your presence.
Sure, you can enjoy it. Especially if you ignore the elephant in the room.
This isn't a court of law but merely an opinion based forum. You cannot prove he doesn't use some chemical assistance either. And the Aussie's don't dope' argument is pointless (Freeman and the 'dirty little secret' with Bideau/Pearson and the braces/Thorpe suspected HGH to name a couple). I would like to think he is not doping but in the current climate it's reasonable to be suspicious. If he was African a lot of people would be already be drawing negative conclusions.
Sure, you can enjoy it. Especially if you ignore the elephant in the room.
Prove that Cam is doping or shut up.
I don't have to. It's a given that in a doped sport exceptional achievement will be doped. Especially when it is accomplished on recreational levels of training.
This isn't a court of law but merely an opinion based forum. You cannot prove he doesn't use some chemical assistance either. And the Aussie's don't dope' argument is pointless (Freeman and the 'dirty little secret' with Bideau/Pearson and the braces/Thorpe suspected HGH to name a couple). I would like to think he is not doping but in the current climate it's reasonable to be suspicious. If he was African a lot of people would be already be drawing negative conclusions.
The old rumours raise an interesting point. I'd like to think such a young kid wouldn't touch it, and Telford has a rock solid reputation. But those old MTC rumours won't go away...Maurie etc. I've heard some dodgy things from people who were in the Freeman era. Are we to assume that was 'just a thing that maybe happened then'. Or is there a potential taint in current Aussie runners?
I'm Australian and the rumours about MTC have been around quite awhile. Maurie Plant was defintely implicated with doping (swapping urine samples? Really?). There are athletes here I'm sure are not doping (Liam Adams). But high school aged Kenyans have been done. Also in the USA. Certainly Collegiate level in the USA. So why is it such a stretch to think it would happen here? I would absolutely be happy to be totally wrong.
I don't have to. It's a given that in a doped sport exceptional achievement will be doped. Especially when it is accomplished on recreational levels of training.
You have to. It's not a given. You know nothing about training. You are defaming this and many other athletes.
I don't have to. It's a given that in a doped sport exceptional achievement will be doped. Especially when it is accomplished on recreational levels of training.
You have to. It's not a given. You know nothing about training. You are defaming this and many other athletes.
Training at barely more than a recreational level - 50mpw - doesn't enable a 17 year old run world class times.
This post was edited 19 seconds after it was posted.
You have to. It's not a given. You know nothing about training. You are defaming this and many other athletes.
Training at barely more than a recreational level - 50mpw - doesn't enable a 17 year old run world class times.
Or else you ask someone to follow him on Strava to tell you have he really trains. not crazy loads but avg of 100km last year and 110 after euro summer
I don't have to. It's a given that in a doped sport exceptional achievement will be doped. Especially when it is accomplished on recreational levels of training.
So, it's a given that your beloved Femke is doped.
This isn't a court of law but merely an opinion based forum. You cannot prove he doesn't use some chemical assistance either. And the Aussie's don't dope' argument is pointless (Freeman and the 'dirty little secret' with Bideau/Pearson and the braces/Thorpe suspected HGH to name a couple). I would like to think he is not doping but in the current climate it's reasonable to be suspicious. If he was African a lot of people would be already be drawing negative conclusions.
Aussies dope up their athletes,just like lots of countries do.Theyre very good at not getting caught.Meanwhile if he was russian,moroccan,algerian ,kenyan or chinese there would be an outcry on here.
This isn't a court of law but merely an opinion based forum. You cannot prove he doesn't use some chemical assistance either. And the Aussie's don't dope' argument is pointless (Freeman and the 'dirty little secret' with Bideau/Pearson and the braces/Thorpe suspected HGH to name a couple). I would like to think he is not doping but in the current climate it's reasonable to be suspicious. If he was African a lot of people would be already be drawing negative conclusions.
Aussies dope up their athletes,just like lots of countries do.Theyre very good at not getting caught.Meanwhile if he was russian,moroccan,algerian ,kenyan or chinese there would be an outcry on here.
This post is a prime example of why these days I rarely come to this forum.
This isn't a court of law but merely an opinion based forum. You cannot prove he doesn't use some chemical assistance either. And the Aussie's don't dope' argument is pointless (Freeman and the 'dirty little secret' with Bideau/Pearson and the braces/Thorpe suspected HGH to name a couple). I would like to think he is not doping but in the current climate it's reasonable to be suspicious. If he was African a lot of people would be already be drawing negative conclusions.
Aussies dope up their athletes,just like lots of countries do.Theyre very good at not getting caught.Meanwhile if he was russian,moroccan,algerian ,kenyan or chinese there would be an outcry on here.
See the the thing is, you keep saying that with not even any argument let alone evidence to back it up.
We've updated our BetterRunningShoes.com web site to make it easier to find good deals on the best shoes. To keep it great we need new shoe reviews from you.