And despite regular protestations of innocence to Congress, the $1 trillion multinational tech giant is using its virtual monopoly as a search engine to elevate liberal views, stifle conservatives and manipulate the impressionable minds of our children.
Pressed by businesses, interest groups and governments, the internet giant uses blacklists, algorithm tweaks and an army of contractors to shape what you see.
And despite regular protestations of innocence to Congress, the $1 trillion multinational tech giant is using its virtual monopoly as a search engine to elevate liberal views, stifle conservatives and manipulate the impressionable minds of our children.
Not so much about free speech as it it is about censorship and manipulation designed to favor democrats at every turn.
Google's biased search algorithm has "likely" swayed millions of votes in favor of Democrats. He also believes Google's impact on speech and thought is much more impactful than almost any other effort to affect the results of an election, including ballot harvesting, dirty registration rolls, machine shenanigans, and even the censoring connected with the government's partnerships with social media platforms.
Google employees, called Googlers, tweak search-related functions in favor of one narrative or another. We know this because of Google's leaked emails discussed by Tucker Carlson on Fox News in September 2018.
Ok, assuming this is as bad as he posits, what is your solution? Just call them out?
Not much can be done. There are no solutions. Just calling them out.
California was the center of internet censorship when the Biden regime told California companies Google and Twitter to remove posts and information about C19, vaccines, election fraud, and the Hunter Biden laptop.
DRUM ROLL: Google willingly did what their democrat masters told them to do.
LetsRun has installed a pro Wazzu1452 bias in its search results. I searched Wazzu and almost all of the results had some connection to Wazzu1452. But that is not what I wanted. I will be crying tonight.
But it feels right…. Republicans have been driven by feelings instead of facts for a long time. You can say the most idiotic things (remember the kids gettting litter boxes at school that some republican believed) and they base will accept it. It was sort of funny when the grifters were just scamming the base. It is scary to realize the base is big enough to wield political power
Au contraire. The Democrats are the people who insist that palpable biology and physiology are trumped by squishy feelings. And in fact there are things like "kids gettting [sic] litter boxes at school" such as calls for feminine hygiene products in boys' bathrooms and allowing boys in girls' bathrooms. I know that in my overwhelmingly Democrat-dominated city (NYC), males can use locker rooms and bathrooms previously exclusively for the use of females. My former Democrat Mayor Bill De Blasio and the City Council insisted on that. Because of, you know, feelings.
But it feels right…. Republicans have been driven by feelings instead of facts for a long time. You can say the most idiotic things (remember the kids gettting litter boxes at school that some republican believed) and they base will accept it. It was sort of funny when the grifters were just scamming the base. It is scary to realize the base is big enough to wield political power
Au contraire. The Democrats are the people who insist that palpable biology and physiology are trumped by squishy feelings. And in fact there are things like "kids gettting [sic] litter boxes at school" such as calls for feminine hygiene products in boys' bathrooms and allowing boys in girls' bathrooms. I know that in my overwhelmingly Democrat-dominated city (NYC), males can use locker rooms and bathrooms previously exclusively for the use of females. My former Democrat Mayor Bill De Blasio and the City Council insisted on that. Because of, you know, feelings.
Careful using vocabulary like Au contraire. Your right winger card will be revoked immediately
Au contraire. The Democrats are the people who insist that palpable biology and physiology are trumped by squishy feelings. And in fact there are things like "kids gettting [sic] litter boxes at school" such as calls for feminine hygiene products in boys' bathrooms and allowing boys in girls' bathrooms. I know that in my overwhelmingly Democrat-dominated city (NYC), males can use locker rooms and bathrooms previously exclusively for the use of females. My former Democrat Mayor Bill De Blasio and the City Council insisted on that. Because of, you know, feelings.
Careful using vocabulary like Au contraire. Your right winger card will be revoked immediately
As of August 2023, Google accounted for 91.9% of search queries conducted across search engine providers.
With such market dominance, Google controls what users see and what they know. Thus, Google’s influence over American politics is significant.
This week, MRC Free Speech America uncovered how Google manipulates the search results of presidential candidates.
The group searched “Republican presidential campaign websites” on the eve of Wednesday night’s Republican primary debate. Yet only two candidates appeared on Google, including Will Hurd, a never-Trumper from Texas, who didn’t have enough support to appear during the second debate.
“There was no sign of Donald Trump, Ron DeSantis, Nikki Haley, Vivek Ramaswamy, Mike Pence, Tim Scott or Chris Christie,” writes Miranda Devine.
“But there was one other candidate who showed up on Page 1 of the Republican search results: fringe Democrat Marianne Williamson, whose RealClearPolitics average doesn’t even reach 5%. Maybe that’s Google’s idea of ‘balance.'”
Not so much about free speech as it it is about censorship and manipulation designed to favor democrats at every turn.
Google's biased search algorithm has "likely" swayed millions of votes in favor of Democrats. He also believes Google's impact on speech and thought is much more impactful than almost any other effort to affect the results of an election, including ballot harvesting, dirty registration rolls, machine shenanigans, and even the censoring connected with the government's partnerships with social media platforms.
Google employees, called Googlers, tweak search-related functions in favor of one narrative or another. We know this because of Google's leaked emails discussed by Tucker Carlson on Fox News in September 2018.
As of August 2023, Google accounted for 91.9% of search queries conducted across search engine providers.
With such market dominance, Google controls what users see and what they know. Thus, Google’s influence over American politics is significant.
This week, MRC Free Speech America uncovered how Google manipulates the search results of presidential candidates.
The group searched “Republican presidential campaign websites” on the eve of Wednesday night’s Republican primary debate. Yet only two candidates appeared on Google, including Will Hurd, a never-Trumper from Texas, who didn’t have enough support to appear during the second debate.
“There was no sign of Donald Trump, Ron DeSantis, Nikki Haley, Vivek Ramaswamy, Mike Pence, Tim Scott or Chris Christie,” writes Miranda Devine.
“But there was one other candidate who showed up on Page 1 of the Republican search results: fringe Democrat Marianne Williamson, whose RealClearPolitics average doesn’t even reach 5%. Maybe that’s Google’s idea of ‘balance.'”
Free speech is allowing private organizations to carry out their business how they see fit.
For a bunch of people that run around ranting about smaller government, these losers sure expect the government to regulate everything.
Incredible.
A giant monopoly is steering us away from what we are seeking and toward what the Oligarchs want us to see (lies) and the slave mindset class cheers it as freedom
For a bunch of people that run around ranting about smaller government, these losers sure expect the government to regulate everything.
Incredible.
A giant monopoly is steering us away from what we are seeking and toward what the Oligarchs want us to see (lies) and the slave mindset class cheers it as freedom
Except they're not, at all, as proven multiple times in this thread. It's a bad faith article meant to rile up idiots who don't know any better.
It's amazing how stupid they think their audience is, and it's even more amazing how right they are in thinking that.
You would think that you and wazzu would be embarrassed in how publicly idiotic you're being, but alas, no.
This post was edited 43 seconds after it was posted.
