Back then there wasn't a hemotocrit limit, no biopassport, no HGH test, new EPO test around that time that caught absolutley nobody.
Now there's super spikes, L-carnitine, testosterone cream, better testing for blood doping and EPO + biopassport, and pacing lights.
I'm not convinced overall training is that much better, maybe more mileage, more threshold, less Seb Coe ran <30 miles per week lies. Double threshold? El G was doing two runs at around 5:00/mile most days so I'd call that double threshold combined with double blood doping. The shoes are the biggest change, making up for hematocrit and biopassport.
Certainly you mean training shoes. Can't be racing shoes because 800m records are not being threatened.
Technology doesn't beat doping. That almost inevitably doped records are being beaten is because of doping. It remains further ahead of testing than any time since the '90's.
Do you have the remotest evidence that doping is ahead of testing other than your assumption that all top performances are drug based?
Dopers have always been ahead of testers.
Lance was probably the most tested athlete of all time. Never tested positive. Ditto Marion Jones, etc.
The best way to avoid detection is to simply avoid the test. Other than that, don't dope during competition. You dope during training.
20+ years of training/racing knowledge/discussions contained on these boards 24/7
Yes!!!!! This is the reason. Specifically, training based on AI analysis of Ventolin's (RIP) prediction algorithms and psycho-doping by utilization of his hate-speech.
If everyone was forced to run barefoot and surfaces never changed, records would still be broken. Humans are frighteningly good at finding ways to defeat each other.
I'm not denying the effect of doping or technology, but if we could magically eliminate doping, and hold technology where it is today, I would bet my life that in 100 years, every world record standing today would be broken.
Organisers of the World Championship in Athletics will be on their toes after recent revelations of mass doping by endurance athletes. Here’s what you need to know about doping and how to evade it.
A cache of leaked blood tests showed hundreds of track athletes have recorded results “suggestive of doping.” With the 2015 world track championships about to start, a look at why anti-doping tests are so ineffective.
Luke Rattray The Olympic Games showcase the pinnacle of what a human can accomplish in the athletic realm. Every two years, the world turns to witness the Olympics in its summer or winter format, and over the years, has grown...
Victor Conte explains how he believes the IOC’s lenient whereabouts policy allows Olympic athletes to get away with using illegal performance enhancing drugs...
PALM DESERT, August 30, 2017 – The World Anti-Doping Agency released its annual report for 2016 last week and said it had “turned the corner” against doping. Let’s hope so, since a report it funded in 2011 and released on Tue...
Back then there wasn't a hemotocrit limit, no biopassport, no HGH test, new EPO test around that time that caught absolutley nobody.
Now there's super spikes, L-carnitine, testosterone cream, better testing for blood doping and EPO + biopassport, and pacing lights.
I'm not convinced overall training is that much better, maybe more mileage, more threshold, less Seb Coe ran <30 miles per week lies. Double threshold? El G was doing two runs at around 5:00/mile most days so I'd call that double threshold combined with double blood doping. The shoes are the biggest change, making up for hematocrit and biopassport.
Certainly you mean training shoes. Can't be racing shoes because 800m records are not being threatened.
Maybe the shoes don't make as much of a difference at 800, and the training improvements we're seeing are really only for the mile and up. I don't think we're seeing crazy 800 times in HS/NCAA either, whereas everything longer is blowing up.
Could also be that the 800 responds better to steroids, which are much easier to detect than EPO.
Certainly you mean training shoes. Can't be racing shoes because 800m records are not being threatened.
Maybe the shoes don't make as much of a difference at 800, and the training improvements we're seeing are really only for the mile and up. I don't think we're seeing crazy 800 times in HS/NCAA either, whereas everything longer is blowing up.
Could also be that the 800 responds better to steroids, which are much easier to detect than EPO.
Depends on this steroid. Designer steroids are also a dime a dozen. They are also the true 'training drug' for distance runners and as long as you avoid whereabouts positives there is never any reason you would pop hot.
Steroids have always and will always be the best PED for any athlete.
Maybe the shoes don't make as much of a difference at 800, and the training improvements we're seeing are really only for the mile and up. I don't think we're seeing crazy 800 times in HS/NCAA either, whereas everything longer is blowing up.
Could also be that the 800 responds better to steroids, which are much easier to detect than EPO.
Depends on this steroid. Designer steroids are also a dime a dozen. They are also the true 'training drug' for distance runners and as long as you avoid whereabouts positives there is never any reason you would pop hot.
Steroids have always and will always be the best PED for any athlete.
Alan
Evidence the designer steroids that can not be tested are “ dime a dozen”. Name one?
whereabouts get round is not like it was when USADA gave advance notice.
Again, the athletes from 2011 are safe since 2022. Retesting is only allowed for ten years.
So still no evidence that 40% doped at the WC.
Huh? The article literally says "Study says 44% of IAAF World Champs athletes doped in 2011". That's actually quite old news - have you never read it, or are you just trolling?