While this is absolutely horrible, I don't see who it benefits in terms of him losing his job. What's the point of that? I can think of loads of other things that would be more fitting, like apologising, having a conversation with the woman, finding out what caused this (did he mix alcohol with something, does he have any memory of it), finding out what she thinks would be a fitting punishment, community service, alcohol awareness etc. Having said this, maybe he's getting off lightly as I read about the drunken brawl which is possibly resulting in two men getting 20 years in prison in the USA (diverted flight and interfering with the flight crew).
While this is absolutely horrible, I don't see who it benefits in terms of him losing his job. What's the point of that? I can think of loads of other things that would be more fitting, like apologising, having a conversation with the woman, finding out what caused this (did he mix alcohol with something, does he have any memory of it), finding out what she thinks would be a fitting punishment, community service, alcohol awareness etc. Having said this, maybe he's getting off lightly as I read about the drunken brawl which is possibly resulting in two men getting 20 years in prison in the USA (diverted flight and interfering with the flight crew).
How about I pee on your face. Don't worry, I'll apologise right after and then we can move on with our lives. Where do you wanna meet?
While this is absolutely horrible, I don't see who it benefits in terms of him losing his job. What's the point of that? I can think of loads of other things that would be more fitting, like apologising, having a conversation with the woman, finding out what caused this (did he mix alcohol with something, does he have any memory of it), finding out what she thinks would be a fitting punishment, community service, alcohol awareness etc. Having said this, maybe he's getting off lightly as I read about the drunken brawl which is possibly resulting in two men getting 20 years in prison in the USA (diverted flight and interfering with the flight crew).
Why does it have to benefit anyone? A company can fire someone pretty much anytime they want for almost any reason.
We don't know anything about this employee's history with the company. Maybe his job performance was not up to par. Maybe there had been other incidents of inappropriate behavior with this employee. Or, maybe the company just didn't want someone in a key management role who went around urinating on people when they got drunk. A lot of people have been fired for a lot less.
Now people may wonder why I'd post it under my name. That's a great question. In recent years, I've been posting way more often under my name as people always complain about 'anonymous posting'. This is the perfect example of why we have anonymous posting.
If this 'dirty' little topic was on the site with an anonymous OP, no one would have a problem with it. But since people know that I started it, they have a problem with it.
Again, your logic fails to deliver. It seems that you agree that trolling under an anonymous name should be off limits for a moderator. But rather than improve the quality of your posting, you choose instead to troll under your registered name.
We WOULD have a problem with an anonymous poster posting this TRASH. We DO have MORE of a problem with YOU posting it, because you are the co-creator of this website.
Now people may wonder why I'd post it under my name. That's a great question. In recent years, I've been posting way more often under my name as people always complain about 'anonymous posting'. This is the perfect example of why we have anonymous posting.
If this 'dirty' little topic was on the site with an anonymous OP, no one would have a problem with it. But since people know that I started it, they have a problem with it.
Again, your logic fails to deliver. It seems that you agree that trolling under an anonymous name should be off limits for a moderator. But rather than improve the quality of your posting, you choose instead to troll under your registered name.
We WOULD have a problem with an anonymous poster posting this TRASH. We DO have MORE of a problem with YOU posting it, because you are the co-creator of this website.
what has the world come to? What are YOU doing to help? I mean besides sitting in your house, surfing the internet, and driving clicks on your website with your trolling and manufactured outrage. With your resources es, there’s plenty you could be doing to help your community and the world at large, and yet here you are, yet again, crying on the internet about something you read on the internet. You’re making the world a worse place to live in
came here to say this
I mean this is hardly Rojo's fault is it?
Are you suggesting that if he hadn't been running the website he could have been on that flight, diving in slow motion in front of that wang, taking a wee bullet for an old lady?
I'm blaming that bloke from Wells Fargo personally. And I note you're perfectly happy to visit the LRC site.
If this was representative of the level of discourse on this site, I would not visit it at all.
I only clicked on it because I could not believe the owner of the site would post it, thereby implicitly approving of spreading this level of trash on the site.
Do whatever the hell you want, but make no mistake about it, this is cheap, disgusting, and offensive.
Is this what you want your site associated with? Really?
You do know there is an option to filter out all non-running threads
I'm not advocating for allowing people to pee on other people. I'm advocating for airlines to get tougher and ban someone for life. How is it offensive? What is offensive is for an airline to ban a passenger for a month.
If this was representative of the level of discourse on this site, I would not visit it at all.
I only clicked on it because I could not believe the owner of the site would post it, thereby implicitly approving of spreading this level of trash on the site.
Do whatever the hell you want, but make no mistake about it, this is cheap, disgusting, and offensive.
Is this what you want your site associated with? Really?
You do know there is an option to filter out all non-running threads
I'm not advocating for allowing people to pee on other people. I'm advocating for airlines to get tougher and ban someone for life. How is it offensive? What is offensive is for an airline to ban a passenger for a month.
If this was representative of the level of discourse on this site, I would not visit it at all.
I only clicked on it because I could not believe the owner of the site would post it, thereby implicitly approving of spreading this level of trash on the site.
Do whatever the hell you want, but make no mistake about it, this is cheap, disgusting, and offensive.
Is this what you want your site associated with? Really?
You do know there is an option to filter out all non-running threads
I'm not advocating for allowing people to pee on other people. I'm advocating for airlines to get tougher and ban someone for life. How is it offensive? What is offensive is for an airline to ban a passenger for a month.
You do know there is an option to filter out all non-running threads
I'm not advocating for allowing people to pee on other people. I'm advocating for airlines to get tougher and ban someone for life. How is it offensive? What is offensive is for an airline to ban a passenger for a month.
Yeah, but I am not allowed to post that someone else is not facing the consequences of his egregious acts, and setting a bad example.
While this is absolutely horrible, I don't see who it benefits in terms of him losing his job. What's the point of that? I can think of loads of other things that would be more fitting, like apologising, having a conversation with the woman, finding out what caused this (did he mix alcohol with something, does he have any memory of it), finding out what she thinks would be a fitting punishment, community service, alcohol awareness etc. Having said this, maybe he's getting off lightly as I read about the drunken brawl which is possibly resulting in two men getting 20 years in prison in the USA (diverted flight and interfering with the flight crew).
How about I pee on your face. Don't worry, I'll apologise right after and then we can move on with our lives. Where do you wanna meet?
I'd rather someone apologise than lose their job. I don't think he peed on her face either (might be wrong there).
If this was representative of the level of discourse on this site, I would not visit it at all.
I only clicked on it because I could not believe the owner of the site would post it, thereby implicitly approving of spreading this level of trash on the site.
Do whatever the hell you want, but make no mistake about it, this is cheap, disgusting, and offensive.
Is this what you want your site associated with? Really?
You do know there is an option to filter out all non-running threads
I'm not advocating for allowing people to pee on other people. I'm advocating for airlines to get tougher and ban someone for life. How is it offensive? What is offensive is for an airline to ban a passenger for a month.
rojo, let's be clear - what you are doing is populating the forum with tabloid trash about people doing unspeakable acts. You are not fooling anyone - there are lots of interesting things going on in the world and the fact that you choose stories like this speaks for itself.
Choose your path and we will choose ours.
But perhaps you can appreciate that some of us have advised you that we find stories like this offensive and we would prefer that an otherwise interesting and engaging message board not be demeaned with such base and tasteless subject matter.
Yea, I can't believe they fired him. I mean, at Wells Fargo it is company policy to piss on customers, so it is nothing out of the ordinary. I guess "literally" doing it crosses some line we didn't know existed.
If this was representative of the level of discourse on this site, I would not visit it at all.
I only clicked on it because I could not believe the owner of the site would post it, thereby implicitly approving of spreading this level of trash on the site.
Do whatever the hell you want, but make no mistake about it, this is cheap, disgusting, and offensive.
Is this what you want your site associated with? Really?
You do know there is an option to filter out all non-running threads
I'm not advocating for allowing people to pee on other people. I'm advocating for airlines to get tougher and ban someone for life. How is it offensive? What is offensive is for an airline to ban a passenger for a month.
How about you begin on your own site and ban people for life for posting something blatantly racist or homophobic?
Maybe just delete the whole trashy thread. My post that made fun of WF company culture was deleted, but you left all this other trash up? Is WF advertising here? If so, you criticized them for their actions also. I figured fair game. Moderating on this site is inconsistent at best.