brien evans wrote:
westsouthrunner wrote:
Imagine the actions kept occuring unchecked and something even worse happened to him. This is a lesson to corporations to get their workplace in order.
Imagine the type of people that believe they can treat a coworker this way and not think their job was in jeopardy. Lots of privilege gone to their head here. This is how the world balances itself out I suppose
The premise of the case is super weird...
I've worked in plenty of companies and have never seen anyone openly drawing black caricatures to mock black people. EVERYONE I work with would have a problem with it. EVERY HR department would have a problem with it. And aren't Californians super liberal and totally love black people? And this happens in Fremont?
Feels like Althea Bernstein again, but this guy got a lawyer to believe him.
Eh good point. Hope they have security cameras or something. Doesn't help Tesla or those in denial that this could occur that there are other similar lawsuits against Tesla themselves. Or even the Jury that decided in Owen's favor
"Tesla uses mandatory arbitration to compel employees to resolve disputes behind closed doors rather than in a public trial.
Like other companies that use mandatory arbitration, Tesla rarely faces significant damages or takes deep corrective actions after arbitrators settle a dispute. However, Tesla was required to pay $1 million — as the result of an arbitration agreement — to another former worker, Melvin Berry, who also endured a racist, hostile workplace at Tesla.
A pending class-action lawsuit in Alameda County in California — Vaughn v. Tesla Inc. — also alleges that Tesla is rife with racist discrimination and harassment."
-
https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2021/10/05/tesla-must-pay-137-million-to-ex-worker-over-hostile-work-environment-racism.htmlIt does look like they have made measures to try to stop things like this occurring again after 2016