casual obsever wrote:
rekrunner wrote:
But I’m not convinced that “silent bans” are something real.
And yet, it was allowed all the time:
rekrunner wrote:
Serving a ban in secret, and being allowed to compete while awaiting sanction are two “carrots” permitted by the WADA code
In any case, Ngetich's case proves that to be a real possibility for Aden:
casual obsever wrote:
A (now expired) silent four year ban, as the AIU for example also gave to drug cheat Houlihan (but Aden accepted the ban rather than going to CAS)
A (now expired) silent ban, as USADA for example also gave to drug cheat Ngetich.
You must be bored to resurrect a month old thread.
Way back in August, I wrote I wasn’t convinced that secret bans exist, as I wasn’t sure, and had never seen any details (nor looked).
As you showed us excerpts of the AIU policy of non-silent transparency, I was motivated to see what significant clauses would allow such “silence”, and a couple hours later, I was convinced that indeed there are exceptions to the rule, when there is a compelling justification to delay or forego announcement of a ban.
Since then, the rather long delay in the case of Ngetich, and further review of the relevant parts of the WADA code, further showed me that WADA permits several incentives in exchange for significant assistance.
As I said back in August, “With so little “real” information about Aden in the last 5 years, I won’t say anything is impossible.”
It’s a real possibility for Aden, just like the CAS said it is possible that Houlihan ate soy-fed uncastrated boar offal.
Asserting a possibility is not a very high bar.
It raises the questions though, what the compelling justification would be, and if Aden did provide (or could provide) any substantial assistance, and against whom.