Yep. It’s all Garland. Not at all related to Trump’s increased visibility inviting scrutiny nor the greater volume of his public statements providing ample fodder for prosecution. No indictment of a sitting President explains the absence from 2017 to 2021, as does the kind of yes-man fealty Trump demands of subordinates.
And I can’t possibly fathom why he wasn’t indicted for not returning presidential security documents before he was president!
Trump “charity” investigated well in advance, but with little to get Teflon Don on.
I don’t know if you’ve ever done this in particular, but you have the characteristics of all the people convinced of Obama, being hyper susceptible to weaponization his justice department. i’m not sure how that aligns with him not going after Trump during the birther fiasco. If they just want to get the guy they hate …
Donald Trump has been investigated in every decade of his adult life by federal and state agencies, among others. A timeline of investigations since 1972.
Weird how Trump has been around for decades yet the indictments only began to fly when Merrick Garland was named AG
No, not at all. The only federal indictments that I'm aware of (and which I'm sure you've never read) are the Bathroom case and the Fake Electors case, which primarily relate to crimes committed from January through July 2021 and from November 2020 through January 2021, respectively. So really the only AG who could have been running the DOJ during those indictments is Garland who was sworn in as AG in March 2021. So, you're pretty weird for thinking any of this is weird. What isn't weird to you?
Yep. It’s all Garland. Not at all related to Trump’s increased visibility inviting scrutiny nor the greater volume of his public statements providing ample fodder for prosecution. No indictment of a sitting President explains the absence from 2017 to 2021, as does the kind of yes-man fealty Trump demands of subordinates.
And I can’t possibly fathom why he wasn’t indicted for not returning presidential security documents before he was president!
Trump “charity” investigated well in advance, but with little to get Teflon Don on.
I don’t know if you’ve ever done this in particular, but you have the characteristics of all the people convinced of Obama, being hyper susceptible to weaponization his justice department. i’m not sure how that aligns with him not going after Trump during the birther fiasco. If they just want to get the guy they hate …
So in other words your answer is no. You cannot provide a list of indictments of Trump prior to 2021.
Is there anyone that can
Yes Trump was very low profile pre 2021. Hardly any visibility. That must be it. After all, whoever heard of Trump prior to 2021?
Trump was not a presidential candidate until the last year of the Obama admin. Maybe that's why his AG was not going after him?
I can't fathom why your noting that one of the four indictments against him could not have occurred before he was president proves anything
Weird how Trump has been around for decades yet the indictments only began to fly when Merrick Garland was named AG
No, not at all. The only federal indictments that I'm aware of (and which I'm sure you've never read) are the Bathroom case and the Fake Electors case, which primarily relate to crimes committed from January through July 2021 and from November 2020 through January 2021, respectively. So really the only AG who could have been running the DOJ during those indictments is Garland who was sworn in as AG in March 2021. So, you're pretty weird for thinking any of this is weird. What isn't weird to you?
Huh?
The guy was a billionaire businessman in NYC real estate and in gambling for decades. Where are all the indictments pre his presidency?
Weird how Trump has been around for decades yet the indictments only began to fly when Merrick Garland was named AG
Left wingers don’t like Garland because it took too long to name a special counsel, right wingers because the dear leader has been wrongly indicted and they want him to rule over them again.
Weird how Trump has been around for decades yet the indictments only began to fly when Merrick Garland was named AG
Left wingers don’t like Garland because it took too long to name a special counsel, right wingers because the dear leader has been wrongly indicted and they want him to rule over them again.
The arc of justice is long.
His Justice Dept calling Roman Catholics and parents domestic terrorists may have something to do with it.
No, not at all. The only federal indictments that I'm aware of (and which I'm sure you've never read) are the Bathroom case and the Fake Electors case, which primarily relate to crimes committed from January through July 2021 and from November 2020 through January 2021, respectively. So really the only AG who could have been running the DOJ during those indictments is Garland who was sworn in as AG in March 2021. So, you're pretty weird for thinking any of this is weird. What isn't weird to you?
Huh?
The guy was a billionaire businessman in NYC real estate and in gambling for decades. Where are all the indictments pre his presidency?
You make good case for more indictments in the past. indeed. But at this time, Trump is being indicted for his recent crimes which rose to the level of endangering our country.
And of course his blatant business fraud.
pretty simple stuff really.
What Newname is doing is this;
”My guy has been a criminal since forever. So the fact that he is finally getting caught is proof that it is political”
Donnie is attempting to use the same defense which will not turn out well for him.
BREAKING: Jack SMITH has gone straight to SCOTUS on the question of presidential immunity for Donald Trump's Washington, D.C. charges and he's seeking to expedite the matter.
Fast Track for Delaying Donnie. Love to see it.
They filed that fast. The prosecution had the brief to the Supreme Court ready to go months ago, maybe even before the filed the Indictment. There is some massive flowchart somewhere in the prosecution's war room with a decision point for every move Trump might make. And this one was obvious, but it's still pretty amazing that they went straight to the SCOTUS.
What will the SCOTUS do on the petition? If they deny it and let things proceed in the typical fashion, they are faced with the same thing in a month or two when the appeals court rules. If they grant the petition, it still involves a months long process at a minimum. I guess the real question is whether they stay the district court case or not. The district court has not even stayed it yet, and presumably won't. A lot of moving parts in this, but I don't see that March 4 trial date happening.
No, not at all. The only federal indictments that I'm aware of (and which I'm sure you've never read) are the Bathroom case and the Fake Electors case, which primarily relate to crimes committed from January through July 2021 and from November 2020 through January 2021, respectively. So really the only AG who could have been running the DOJ during those indictments is Garland who was sworn in as AG in March 2021. So, you're pretty weird for thinking any of this is weird. What isn't weird to you?
Huh?
The guy was a billionaire businessman in NYC real estate and in gambling for decades. Where are all the indictments pre his presidency?
There are none that I'm aware of. What federal crimes did Trump commit that you think he should have been federally indicted for before he was president?
Did you even read my response to you? I directly answered your weird suggestive question about Garland and Trump Indictments. I don't think I could have been clearer and more factual, and all you did was say "Huh?" and change the topic. Weird.
The guy was a billionaire businessman in NYC real estate and in gambling for decades. Where are all the indictments pre his presidency?
There are none that I'm aware of. What federal crimes did Trump commit that you think he should have been federally indicted for before he was president?
Did you even read my response to you? I directly answered your weird suggestive question about Garland and Trump Indictments. I don't think I could have been clearer and more factual, and all you did was say "Huh?" and change the topic. Weird.
You ‘liberals’ are truly the most dangerously stupid people in society.
1
5
Tacopina Joe and his throbbing Temple vein of Doom
They filed that fast. The prosecution had the brief to the Supreme Court ready to go months ago, maybe even before the filed the Indictment. There is some massive flowchart somewhere in the prosecution's war room with a decision point for every move Trump might make. And this one was obvious, but it's still pretty amazing that they went straight to the SCOTUS.
What will the SCOTUS do on the petition? If they deny it and let things proceed in the typical fashion, they are faced with the same thing in a month or two when the appeals court rules. If they grant the petition, it still involves a months long process at a minimum. I guess the real question is whether they stay the district court case or not. The district court has not even stayed it yet, and presumably won't. A lot of moving parts in this, but I don't see that March 4 trial date happening.
Fast track. And SCOTUS, with their recent scandals, will be loathe to do something crazy like say presidents can commit crimes willy-nilly and get away with it. No kings. March 4 is coming.
2
0
Tacopina Joe and his throbbing Temple vein of Doom
Fast track. And SCOTUS, with their recent scandals, will be loathe to do something crazy like say presidents can commit crimes willy-nilly and get away with it. No kings. March 4 is coming.
BREAKING: Jack SMITH has gone straight to SCOTUS on the question of presidential immunity for Donald Trump's Washington, D.C. charges and he's seeking to expedite the matter.
Fast Track for Delaying Donnie. Love to see it.
They filed that fast. The prosecution had the brief to the Supreme Court ready to go months ago, maybe even before the filed the Indictment. There is some massive flowchart somewhere in the prosecution's war room with a decision point for every move Trump might make. And this one was obvious, but it's still pretty amazing that they went straight to the SCOTUS.
What will the SCOTUS do on the petition? If they deny it and let things proceed in the typical fashion, they are faced with the same thing in a month or two when the appeals court rules. If they grant the petition, it still involves a months long process at a minimum. I guess the real question is whether they stay the district court case or not. The district court has not even stayed it yet, and presumably won't. A lot of moving parts in this, but I don't see that March 4 trial date happening.
That’s not my understanding at all. A SC decision to reject an immunity defense would be definitive and could not be appealed. I doubt Trump’s legal team believes it could ultimately win an immunity defense in the SC, but going through an appeals process could delay the trial to the point the trial wouldn’t happen until after a Trump presidency which is why Smith is requesting an immediate resolution on the issue.
There are none that I'm aware of. What federal crimes did Trump commit that you think he should have been federally indicted for before he was president?
Did you even read my response to you? I directly answered your weird suggestive question about Garland and Trump Indictments. I don't think I could have been clearer and more factual, and all you did was say "Huh?" and change the topic. Weird.
You ‘liberals’ are truly the most dangerously stupid people in society.
I'm not a liberal by any definition of the term.
Your post is weird. I was responding to that weirdo Newman about his weird question and you weirdly decided to chime in with a superfluous statement. That's weird. Like liberal weird. Are you a liberal? You post like one.
Sometimes I wonder if Trumpers think through some of Trumps own legal filings completely and recognize what exactly they are supporting.
for example:
If Trump has absolute Presidential immunity (aka Monarchy) to rile up a crowd to stop certification of the vote then Biden can do the same. And Biden is free to conjure up even more dastardly crime schemes to overturn a future election too.
why? Because of the absolute presidential immunity Trump says they have.
They filed that fast. The prosecution had the brief to the Supreme Court ready to go months ago, maybe even before the filed the Indictment. There is some massive flowchart somewhere in the prosecution's war room with a decision point for every move Trump might make. And this one was obvious, but it's still pretty amazing that they went straight to the SCOTUS.
What will the SCOTUS do on the petition? If they deny it and let things proceed in the typical fashion, they are faced with the same thing in a month or two when the appeals court rules. If they grant the petition, it still involves a months long process at a minimum. I guess the real question is whether they stay the district court case or not. The district court has not even stayed it yet, and presumably won't. A lot of moving parts in this, but I don't see that March 4 trial date happening.
That’s not my understanding at all. A SC decision to reject an immunity defense would be definitive and could not be appealed. I doubt Trump’s legal team believes it could ultimately win an immunity defense in the SC, but going through an appeals process could delay the trial to the point the trial wouldn’t happen until after a Trump presidency which is why Smith is requesting an immediate resolution on the issue.
I understand a SCOTUS decision is definitive and can not be appealed.
I believe I was just pondering the status of the district court case through all the options the SCOTUS may take. The SCOTUS can deny this prosecution petition for certiorari without deciding anything about presidential immunity, and let the district court and appeals process proceed up to the SCOTUS in the usual fashion. It's difficult to predict what will happen, but its seems to me that March 4 trial date is unlikely with all this going on.
