Kudos to the veep. He is showing some backbone - one of the only Republicans with the courage to tell the truth. Nice.
CNN — Former Vice President Mike Pence made his most blistering comments yet about former President Donald Trump’s role in the January 6th attack on the US Capitol during remarks Saturday evening at the annual Gridiron Club Dinner in Washington, DC. Pence began his remarks at the dinner, which traditionally features politicians making jokes about notable Washington figures, with lighthearted comments about Trump, President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris and several Republicans expected to run for president in 2024, including Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and former UN Ambassador Nikki Haley. He then took a serious tone, noting the attack on the Capitol was “one thing I haven’t joked about” and calling January 6th “a tragic day.” Pence rebuked Trump for his role in the January 6, 2021 attack, saying he was “wrong” for claiming Pence had the authority to overturn the results of the 2020 election in his role presiding over Congress that day, saying “history will hold Donald Trump accountable.” “President Trump was wrong. I had no right to overturn the election and his reckless words endangered my family and everyone at the Capitol that day, and I know that history will hold Donald Trump accountable,” Pence said. What to know about the Tucker Carlson January 6 footage Pence also scolded those who have downplayed the people who entered the Capitol on January 6th as tourists. “Tourists don’t injure 140 police officers by sightseeing,” Pence said. “Tourists don’t break down doors to get to the Speaker of the House or voice threats against public officials.” Pence chastised Republicans who minimized the insurrection, days after Fox News host Tucker Carlson aired new security footage from inside the Capitol on January 6th in an attempt to defend the mob. “Make no mistake about it, what happened that day was a disgrace, and it mocks decency to portray it in any other way,” Pence said at the dinner.
It was a very politically opportune time. Fox has just been exposed regarding their lies about 1/6 and the election, big money donors are looking for a Trump substitute, m'aga cultists will never support Pence anyway, Trump's hold on the party is just starting to diminish, and he had to do something to jump start his anemic campaign for nomination.
Its about two years too late for me to give him too much credit. Its just that the very high level of cowardice in the Republican party, by comparison, make him look like he has backbone.
The second paragraph sums up my thoughts about it fairly well.
And while it won't happen, I have ZERO problem with anyone who showed cowardice and lack of principle during the (ongoing) Trump years paying a permanent political and historical price for that.
So cute that the m'agas are now trying to pin the bank failure on 'woke' ism. good god. A bank invests its portfolio badly and suddenly it's the democrats' fault.
Fact is, 'conservatives,' markets fail from time to time because markets are made up of human decision makers. And humans make terrible mistakes pretty regularly. The job of the government is to stop companies from making mistakes severe enough that they hurt innocent bystanders.
of course, 'conservatives' don't want government to have that role - they deregulated banks under Trump.
Meanwhile, government is cleaning up the environment, ending the ozone hole, helping to fix droughts, usually making banks safer.
It was a very politically opportune time. Fox has just been exposed regarding their lies about 1/6 and the election, big money donors are looking for a Trump substitute, m'aga cultists will never support Pence anyway, Trump's hold on the party is just starting to diminish, and he had to do something to jump start his anemic campaign for nomination.
Its about two years too late for me to give him too much credit. Its just that the very high level of cowardice in the Republican party, by comparison, make him look like he has backbone.
The second paragraph sums up my thoughts about it fairly well.
And while it won't happen, I have ZERO problem with anyone who showed cowardice and lack of principle during the (ongoing) Trump years paying a permanent political and historical price for that.
we really do need to encourage and give credit to Rs who take courageous anti-trump stands. If they get rejected, fewer will take those stands. It's a big mistake punishing people for taking too long to come to see things the way you see them. You should praise them when they step to your side of the line, to encourage them to stay and more to come.
It's interesting that people like you (I think) and Sally (definitely) roll out your comments here and there about how much you actually dislike Trump. But you belie this regularly by making him sound fairly innocuous - wildly, inaccurately, innocuous.
Any half-intelligent person knows that it's BS. One doesn't regularly and excessively downplay the badness of a very bad person if one doesn't have affection for them. You do. And pretty much everything that you post is consistent with an affection for a guy like Trump (SLIGHTLY less true of Sally, who might have a morsel of decency hiding inside).
More importantly, because it doesn't just concern the two of you, is the fact that you and the rest of the R party CONSTANTLY ignore the fact that all of you "real conservatives" don't HAVE to pick Trump as your standard bearer. You could pick literally thousands of other Rs - EVERY SINGLE ONE OF WHOM would be AT LEAST as "conservative" AND more decent than Trump. But you don't. The R party doesn't. Because you like him. Admit it.
Or at least stop making pathetic arguments that PRETEND that your leader HAS to be Trump.
We live in a 2 party system. If you roll out 2 horrible candidates we are forced to choose the lesser of 2 evils.
I didn't vote for Trump in the primary. I voted for him in the general because the alternative was Hillary Clinton. A worse choice.
There was no primary in 2020. I voted for Trump in the general because the alternative was Joe Biden. A worse choice.
I don't want want Trump to run in 2024.
I like Trump personally. He's a funny guy. He's only toxic to toxic people. I recognize, however, that with 99% of American media carrying water for the Democrats he can't win the popular vote so I don't want him to be the nominee.
I would vote for road kill before I would vote for Joe Biden. In addition to having more charisma the road kill would be better for the country.
You often feel the need to explain to us that we live in a 2 party country. We know that. It doesn't explain why one party has been choosing Trump and Trumpism for 6 or 7 years, now? How many Rs would do, policy-wise, pretty much what Trump did? Right, all of them. So complicated.
Second, to write that Trump is "only toxic to toxic people" is 100% absurd (and embarrassing, if that's possible). And, of course, is utterly inconsistent with your supposed low view of him. It seems overwhelmingly likely that only someone with a relatively or extremely high view of him could bring themselves to PRETEND that he's not a horrible human being and public official. And that's utterly irrespective of who might be on the other side of the aisle.
Lastly, millions of Trumpers NEEDING to talk themselves into (and BE talked into by ADMITTED charlatans) the idea that JOE BIDEN is the anti-christ is really, really dumb. And dangerous. Of course.
I was pretty young, but here are 2 things that I'm pretty sure happened in the 70s that show just how far the GOP has fallen since then:
1) They told Nixon to go home. And for having done far less bad than Trump.
2) While they mocked him and obviously wanted to defeat him, they DIDN'T talk themselves into/pretend that Jimmy Carter was everything that Nixon was, and much worse.
So cute that the m'agas are now trying to pin the bank failure on 'woke' ism. good god. A bank invests its portfolio badly and suddenly it's the democrats' fault.
Fact is, 'conservatives,' markets fail from time to time because markets are made up of human decision makers. And humans make terrible mistakes pretty regularly. The job of the government is to stop companies from making mistakes severe enough that they hurt innocent bystanders.
of course, 'conservatives' don't want government to have that role - they deregulated banks under Trump.
Meanwhile, government is cleaning up the environment, ending the ozone hole, helping to fix droughts, usually making banks safer.
SVB is just another addition to Biden's wonderful resume as POTUS.
It was a very politically opportune time. Fox has just been exposed regarding their lies about 1/6 and the election, big money donors are looking for a Trump substitute, m'aga cultists will never support Pence anyway, Trump's hold on the party is just starting to diminish, and he had to do something to jump start his anemic campaign for nomination.
Its about two years too late for me to give him too much credit. Its just that the very high level of cowardice in the Republican party, by comparison, make him look like he has backbone.
The second paragraph sums up my thoughts about it fairly well.
And while it won't happen, I have ZERO problem with anyone who showed cowardice and lack of principle during the (ongoing) Trump years paying a permanent political and historical price for that.
Do you think Michael Cohen got off too easy? How about Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman?
The second paragraph sums up my thoughts about it fairly well.
And while it won't happen, I have ZERO problem with anyone who showed cowardice and lack of principle during the (ongoing) Trump years paying a permanent political and historical price for that.
we really do need to encourage and give credit to Rs who take courageous anti-trump stands. If they get rejected, fewer will take those stands. It's a big mistake punishing people for taking too long to come to see things the way you see them. You should praise them when they step to your side of the line, to encourage them to stay and more to come.
I think that both a principled and practical view of this argues against your position:
1) The principled position is that public officials should pay a price for cowardice in the face of horrendous leadership, culminating in no less than the attempted destruction of our democracy. In other words, have high standards for the most powerful people in the world, not low standards.
2) Practically, it obviously doesn't matter what me and agip and "decide" about Pence. And even if any on-the-fence Rs were listening to us, does it make sense that any of them would agree that Pence is a coward, but STILL vote for Trump/Trumpers? Rs need to decide that they don't want Trump/Trumpers. And I think that moderates/liberals rolling their eyes at or mocking fair-weather Trumpers has very little, if any, influence on them.
The second paragraph sums up my thoughts about it fairly well.
And while it won't happen, I have ZERO problem with anyone who showed cowardice and lack of principle during the (ongoing) Trump years paying a permanent political and historical price for that.
Do you think Michael Cohen got off too easy? How about Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman?
I'm honestly not sure what the point of this question is. And I don't mean that in a mean way, I just don't.
But I will lay out my rough view of Cohen, not knowing a whole lot about him:
- Slime ball lawyer making a lot of money for a slime ball boss. But WASN'T, that I know, enabling him as dirty public official. But maybe I have the later timeline incorrect.
- ACTUALLY got punished and spent time in prison. Not sure how this compares to others convicted of similar crimes, but is obviously way, way more than most Trump political enablers got....or likely will get.
- Judged pretty negatively by many. But yeah, is now the anti-Trump darling of MSNBC.
So cute that the m'agas are now trying to pin the bank failure on 'woke' ism. good god. A bank invests its portfolio badly and suddenly it's the democrats' fault.
Fact is, 'conservatives,' markets fail from time to time because markets are made up of human decision makers. And humans make terrible mistakes pretty regularly. The job of the government is to stop companies from making mistakes severe enough that they hurt innocent bystanders.
of course, 'conservatives' don't want government to have that role - they deregulated banks under Trump.
Meanwhile, government is cleaning up the environment, ending the ozone hole, helping to fix droughts, usually making banks safer.
SVB is just another addition to Biden's wonderful resume as POTUS.
How history doesn't work:
List every bad thing that happened in a country and the world (and the solar system/galaxy/universe?) during a president's administration and claim it was their fault.
Some Good News, a Peace Deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia has been reached, One less possible War, and some are saying it could help end the Yemen War, Biden has to be happy about that, as a war between them could up the price of gas and oil, if the oil fields are destroyed, also both Iran and Saudi Arabia are interested in Joining BRICS, so we can bring our troops home from those areas that are hotspots as far as wars and potential wars go.
we really do need to encourage and give credit to Rs who take courageous anti-trump stands. If they get rejected, fewer will take those stands. It's a big mistake punishing people for taking too long to come to see things the way you see them. You should praise them when they step to your side of the line, to encourage them to stay and more to come.
I think that both a principled and practical view of this argues against your position:
1) The principled position is that public officials should pay a price for cowardice in the face of horrendous leadership, culminating in no less than the attempted destruction of our democracy. In other words, have high standards for the most powerful people in the world, not low standards.
2) Practically, it obviously doesn't matter what me and agip and "decide" about Pence. And even if any on-the-fence Rs were listening to us, does it make sense that any of them would agree that Pence is a coward, but STILL vote for Trump/Trumpers? Rs need to decide that they don't want Trump/Trumpers. And I think that moderates/liberals rolling their eyes at or mocking fair-weather Trumpers has very little, if any, influence on them.
the point is to create a welcoming environment for Rs willing to come out and condemn Trump and the coup attempt. That's all. Same reason you don't shoot or torture people surrendering to you in a war. You want to encourage more to surrender. If you shoot them or torture surrenderers, their colleagues remaining behind will fight you even harder and never surrender. We want more Rs to defend democracy like the Ds are.
This post was edited 2 minutes after it was posted.
Oh yeah, this guy is a POS. He's one of those fools who ran TV political ads of him shooting things with his big manly gun. Man, I gotta get out of this state. At least he has been held accountable for his criminal actions.
SVB is just another addition to Biden's wonderful resume as POTUS.
How history doesn't work:
List every bad thing that happened in a country and the world (and the solar system/galaxy/universe?) during a president's administration and claim it was their fault.
Jesus.
Go woke go broke. They shouldn’t have invested all their money in purple hair dye.
The second paragraph sums up my thoughts about it fairly well.
And while it won't happen, I have ZERO problem with anyone who showed cowardice and lack of principle during the (ongoing) Trump years paying a permanent political and historical price for that.
Do you think Michael Cohen got off too easy? How about Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman?
Michael Cohen has paid dearly and the country owes him a great deal of gratitude. He has more than made amends for past misdeeds.
Any Republican that has a come to Jesus moment and tries a bit of honesty for a change gets my appreciation. But damn the bar to praise republicans has been set pretty low.
Sadly, the party has shunned anyone who has tried to be honest. But with Pence it was self serving the timing and the place he did it......so lets give a Nancy Pelosi golf clap to Pence.
Do you think Michael Cohen got off too easy? How about Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman?
Michael Cohen has paid dearly and the country owes him a great deal of gratitude. He has more than made amends for past misdeeds.
Any Republican that has a come to Jesus moment and tries a bit of honesty for a change gets my appreciation. But damn the bar to praise republicans has been set pretty low.
Sadly, the party has shunned anyone who has tried to be honest. But with Pence it was self serving the timing and the place he did it......so lets give a Nancy Pelosi golf clap to Pence.
Former Vice President Mike Pence's speech at the annual Gridiron Club Dinner served up a few laughs, some kernels of truth and a massive helping of hypocrisy, writes Dean Obeidallah.
Not a bad summary. Until I just read it, I didn't know that Pence also made the comment about the American people ~"deserving to know the truth about Jan 6." That really is rich (gross).
And increases my disagreement with agip on this a bit more.
Michael Cohen has paid dearly and the country owes him a great deal of gratitude. He has more than made amends for past misdeeds.
Any Republican that has a come to Jesus moment and tries a bit of honesty for a change gets my appreciation. But damn the bar to praise republicans has been set pretty low.
Sadly, the party has shunned anyone who has tried to be honest. But with Pence it was self serving the timing and the place he did it......so lets give a Nancy Pelosi golf clap to Pence.
Not a bad summary. Until I just read it, I didn't know that Pence also made the comment about the American people ~"deserving to know the truth about Jan 6." That really is rich (gross).
And increases my disagreement with agip on this a bit more.
He really does strike me at the quintessential "politician." It's SO easy to imagine him telling some wonderful American allegory to a group of children or college students or concerned citizens and saying, in his very thoughtful, sincere, earnest, god-fearing style, something about the great importance of "Having the courage of your convictions."
And then someone asks him, "Sir, do you?"
Pence: "Oh no, of course not. It's just about politics and polling and winning and power and prestige....and being above little people like you. Any more questions?"
And yes, for all the morans, I CAN also imagine any number of Ds doing the EXACT same thing.
....thing is, none of them ever tried to destroy our democracy. Pretty important difference, in case you didn't notice.
"There are ass kissers, there are sycophantic ass kissers, there are shameless ass kissers, there are embarrassing ass kissers ...and then there's Mike Pence" - Fernand Amandi