Lol, lmao, nice Miami you’ve got there. Given the state of things it may very well be the last Miami standing. Thank you for the comic relief, feels awful defending a university administrator who comes out of PoliSci, aaaaaargh!
The person referenced by right-wingers as a "genuine" source, Anne Williiamson, has her degree in PoliSci, and teaches PoliSci undergraduate courses.
President Diversity, without any quotes or even a citation of the source anywhere in the paper: "the average turnout seems to increase linearly as African Americans become a larger proportion of the population. This is one sign that the data contain little aggregation bias. If racial turnout rates changed depending upon a precinct's racial mix, which is one way to think about bias, a linear form would be unlikely in a simple scatter plot. A linear form would only result if the changes in one race's turnout were compensated by changes in the turnout of the other race across the graph."
Source material: "The average turnout seems to decrease linearly as African Americans become a larger proportion of the population. This is one sign that the data contain little aggregation bias. If racial turnout rates changed depending upon a precinct's racial mix, which is one description of bias, a linear form would be unlikely in a simple scatter plot (resulting only when changes in one race's turnout rate somehow compensated for changes in the other's across the graph.)"
While this is a particularly egregious example due to the lack of quotes or even a citation (!), Harvard's honor code is unambiguous-- "It’s not enough to change a few words here and there and leave the rest... If your own language is too close to the original, then you are plagiarizing, even if you do provide a citation."
Who is “President Diversity”? Where is the source material so that I can confirm no citation? It seems to be referring to some analysis by speaking to data correlation, no? So if you and I explain the results of a dataset the same because the underlying facts are the same, I have plagiarized you?
Bradley Palmquist and Stephen Voss. And yes, by any standard you've plagiarized me if you take 64 words verbatim from a paragraph of 74 without any quotes or any citation whatsoever. Especially when the 10 words that were changed were things like "decrease" to "increase", and "description of" to "way to think about". It is essentially a full paragraph taken without any citation at all (I believe this is one of the examples that she discreetly/reluctantly agreed she would change).
But to emphasize, Harvard's standard is unambiguous and far more strict "It’s not enough to change a few words here and there and leave the rest... If your own language is too close to the original, then you are plagiarizing, even if you do provide a citation."
Who is “President Diversity”? Where is the source material so that I can confirm no citation? It seems to be referring to some analysis by speaking to data correlation, no? So if you and I explain the results of a dataset the same because the underlying facts are the same, I have plagiarized you?
Bradley Palmquist and Stephen Voss. And yes, by any standard you've plagiarized me if you take 64 words verbatim from a paragraph of 74 without any quotes or any citation whatsoever. Especially when the 10 words that were changed were things like "decrease" to "increase", and "description of" to "way to think about". It is essentially a full paragraph taken without any citation at all (I believe this is one of the examples that she discreetly/reluctantly agreed she would change).
But to emphasize, Harvard's standard is unambiguous and far more strict "It’s not enough to change a few words here and there and leave the rest... If your own language is too close to the original, then you are plagiarizing, even if you do provide a citation."
Where is the source data? Citations that violate style guides aren’t plagiarism, no many how many bold keystrokes you use. It’s a nothingburger.
I wasn’t being sarcastic in my comment about your Miami intervention. I appreciated the information as I didn’t know there was a Miami, OH.
It is actually located at Oxford. It is a "liberal" arts school. Their NCAA football team is the Redhawks which is 11-2 for this season. Miami is a Native American tribe from the Ohio region.
Bradley Palmquist and Stephen Voss. And yes, by any standard you've plagiarized me if you take 64 words verbatim from a paragraph of 74 without any quotes or any citation whatsoever. Especially when the 10 words that were changed were things like "decrease" to "increase", and "description of" to "way to think about". It is essentially a full paragraph taken without any citation at all (I believe this is one of the examples that she discreetly/reluctantly agreed she would change).
But to emphasize, Harvard's standard is unambiguous and far more strict "It’s not enough to change a few words here and there and leave the rest... If your own language is too close to the original, then you are plagiarizing, even if you do provide a citation."
Where is the source data? Citations that violate style guides aren’t plagiarism, no many how many bold keystrokes you use. It’s a nothingburger.
There was no citation to violate a style guide. That is the whole point. A full paragraph lifted word-for-word, with no citation given to the author she stole from.
But again, to emphasize, Harvard's standard is much more strict than that. Harvard defines plagiarizing as "language [being] too close to the original... even if you do provide a citation."
Where is the source data? Citations that violate style guides aren’t plagiarism, no many how many bold keystrokes you use. It’s a nothingburger.
There was no citation to violate a style guide. That is the whole point. A full paragraph lifted word-for-word, with no citation given to the author she stole from.
Thats not true and you still haven’t provided the source. You are plagiarizing.
Why are you very vigorously admitting that you are prosecuting a question of style not one of ethics? And if Harvard are relaxed about enforcing this, so much so that they declared it their best Political Science dissertation that year why do you care, why should anyones
CAMBRIDGE, MA — As controversy continued to swirl at Harvard University after the school's board expressed unanimous support for its embattled leader, President Claudine Gay responded to the people calling for her removal by...
She plagiarized several papers. No matter which side of the political aisle you are on, that is indisputable.
I haven’t seen anything other than citations not compliant with style guides?
There was an article I read (Slate, maybe) outlining several pieces she wrote that were plagiarized (other than her thesis). Side-by-by with lifted parts.
President Diversity, without any quotes or even a citation of the source anywhere in the paper: "the average turnout seems to increase linearly as African Americans become a larger proportion of the population. This is one sign that the data contain little aggregation bias. If racial turnout rates changed depending upon a precinct's racial mix, which is one way to think about bias, a linear form would be unlikely in a simple scatter plot. A linear form would only result if the changes in one race's turnout were compensated by changes in the turnout of the other race across the graph."
Source material: "The average turnout seems to decrease linearly as African Americans become a larger proportion of the population. This is one sign that the data contain little aggregation bias. If racial turnout rates changed depending upon a precinct's racial mix, which is one description of bias, a linear form would be unlikely in a simple scatter plot (resulting only when changes in one race's turnout rate somehow compensated for changes in the other's across the graph.)"
While this is a particularly egregious example due to the lack of quotes or even a citation (!), Harvard's honor code is unambiguous-- "It’s not enough to change a few words here and there and leave the rest... If your own language is too close to the original, then you are plagiarizing, even if you do provide a citation."
Who is “President Diversity”? Where is the source material so that I can confirm no citation? It seems to be referring to some analysis by speaking to data correlation, no? So if you and I explain the results of a dataset the same because the underlying facts are the same, I have plagiarized you?
The Harvard president who is the most obvious DEI hire there is
Is anyone shocked that the obvious DEI hire can't write for herself?
Oh, you insecure idiot. You probably wish it was you that went to Phillips Exeter, Princeton, Stanford — writing the best economics thesis — and Harvard.
You're just another of the many random losers that have found refuge here.
Who is “President Diversity”? Where is the source material so that I can confirm no citation? It seems to be referring to some analysis by speaking to data correlation, no? So if you and I explain the results of a dataset the same because the underlying facts are the same, I have plagiarized you?
The Harvard president who is the most obvious DEI hire there is
“She’s a black woman so obviously she is not qualified!” is not a compelling argument.
“She’s a black woman so obviously she is not qualified!” is not a compelling argument.
Did anyone mention her skin color as her weakness? Two things are clear. One, she plagiarized other people’s work and was caught. Two, the school is lowering their bar to save her grace. Is that whole thing race related? Maybe, maybe not. She got a character issue now: dishonesty is much worse than incompetence in most people’s book.
I haven’t seen anything other than citations not compliant with style guides?
There was an article I read (Slate, maybe) outlining several pieces she wrote that were plagiarized (other than her thesis). Side-by-by with lifted parts.
Absolutely not on Slate. Try the original right-wing source.
