"Pandemic of the unvaccinated" CONFIRMED

Peter Gandhi wrote:

wuzthere wrote:

Peter Ghandhi, your arrogance is unwarranted. And you participate in the deception by posting that clearly deceptive article that would put that 7,000 plus vaccinated covid deaths as a percent of all the deaths over the entire pandemic. The vaccinations only really got done primarily in April and May of 2021 in highly vaccinated states and over the summer in the slighly lesser vaccinated states. That 7000 plus has to put as a percent of deaths from April to present. That would be a more truthful representation. We would also have to add in the accidentental deaths from the vaccine to that 7000 plus. VAERS is showing about 4,000 adverse deaths.

So let's do11,000 deaths into the 150,000 who died since we reallly started getting the bulk of people vaccinated. That would show only about 7.3% of the covid deaths being the vaccinated. That would prove vaccines work at preventing covid deaths. So why is there a need to exagerate things?

I look at this as a man lying in court. One little lie gets him convicted even though he may be innocent. The problem is that the vaccine is being sold as a magic bullet, in spite of its effectiveness dropping below 50% in less than five months, and that facade is being strigently perpetuated. They also don't want any scrutiny on accidental vaccine deaths. And they refuse to compare vaccines against natural immunity from having had the disease. I would love to see what percent of recovered patients got covid again and died. I would bet that percent trends very close to zero, given that less than 1% of recovered patients get covid again. Israel is keeping track of that percent, and it's virtually zero.

I personally hate deception and when it's coupled with arrogance, I definitely become very wary. And I am not the only one.

I stopped reading when you mentioned VAERS, because you are either ignorant about what VAERS is, or you intentionally misrepresented what it is.

From the VAERS website: VAERS is not designed to determine if a vaccine caused a health problem...

Otherwise, your numbers are likely made up and your assumptions are wrong.

Peter Gandhi wrote:

Uprising wrote:

So this particular priest doesn't conform to the Church Doctrine on Transubstantiation so he will be cancelled and soon excommunicated for the sin of thinking for himself and not for the greater good as delineated by His Holiness Pope Fauci I.

God Bless "The Science".

Even if you are trying to be witty, this is a pretty weird response. Nobody said anything about cancelling Dr. Risch (not even sure what that means in this context). In fact, the open letter from his colleagues that I linked specifically says that he is entitled to his opinion. But his opinion is contrary to the science here, so in my opinion it is of little value. Secondarily, although he is an epidemiologist, he is not an infectious diseases epidemiologist, so for that additional reason his opinion has little value here.

Just because someone is, as you say, "thinking for himself" doesn't mean he's not a crackpot.

Uprising wrote:

Peter Gandhi wrote:

Even if you are trying to be witty, this is a pretty weird response. Nobody said anything about cancelling Dr. Risch (not even sure what that means in this context). In fact, the open letter from his colleagues that I linked specifically says that he is entitled to his opinion. But his opinion is contrary to the science here, so in my opinion it is of little value. Secondarily, although he is an epidemiologist, he is not an infectious diseases epidemiologist, so for that additional reason his opinion has little value here.

Just because someone is, as you say, "thinking for himself" doesn't mean he's not a crackpot.

Any response not couched in CDC ecclesiastic terms and anointed with holy water of the FDA, while sharing of the Body of Christ under proper masking protocol will not be recognized as full communion with The Savior without the blessed receiving of the Holy Vaccination Transubstantiation according to Pope Fauci I, to be repeated in perpetuity every six months or as as His Holiness chooses.

Nonbelievers must be excommunicated and will betray themselves by resistance to Church Edict. Ordered visitation by ordained exorcists will be issued in due course.

God Bless "The Science"

Uprising wrote:

Peter Gandhi wrote:

Even if you are trying to be witty, this is a pretty weird response. Nobody said anything about cancelling Dr. Risch (not even sure what that means in this context). In fact, the open letter from his colleagues that I linked specifically says that he is entitled to his opinion. But his opinion is contrary to the science here, so in my opinion it is of little value. Secondarily, although he is an epidemiologist, he is not an infectious diseases epidemiologist, so for that additional reason his opinion has little value here.

Just because someone is, as you say, "thinking for himself" doesn't mean he's not a crackpot.

Any response not couched in CDC ecclesiastic terms and anointed with holy water of the FDA, while sharing of the Body of Christ under proper masking protocol will not be recognized as full communion with The Savior without the blessed receiving of the Holy Vaccination Transubstantiation according to Pope Fauci I, to be repeated in perpetuity every six months or as as His Holiness chooses.

Nonbelievers must be excommunicated and will betray themselves by resistance to Church Edict. Ordered visitation by ordained exorcists will be issued in due course.

God Bless "The Science"

Karma Police wrote:

This thread is still going?

Here's an update from NSW, the biggest state in Aust (where Sydney is).

- as of 2 days ago, 85.5% fully vaccinated in 16+ age group. 83.65% in the 12+ age group

- 12+ age group expected to get to 90% double vaxxed in 2 weeks (a few days earlier for 16+)

- 7% of new cases in the last week are among the fully vaccinated

- 83% of new cases are unvaccinated (the balance is single dosed).

- That is, the 85% of the population who are double vaxxed make up 7% of new cases. This has been consistent for some time. Without question the vaccines are effective at reducing transmission.

- 6.67% of those in hospital and 4% of those in ICU are double vaxxed. That is, the 15% of people who are not fully vaccinated make up 93% of those in hospital and 96% of those in intensive care. They also make up 93% of new cases.

- When NSW opened up after 100 days of lockdown, the 7-day average was 560 cases per day

- 6 of the last 10 days the cases have been under 300.

Exactly how overwhelming do people want the numbers to be, to show the community benefit in vaccinations?

Noyankee wrote:

Karma Police wrote:

This thread is still going?

Here's an update from NSW, the biggest state in Aust (where Sydney is).

- as of 2 days ago, 85.5% fully vaccinated in 16+ age group. 83.65% in the 12+ age group

- 12+ age group expected to get to 90% double vaxxed in 2 weeks (a few days earlier for 16+)

- 7% of new cases in the last week are among the fully vaccinated

- 83% of new cases are unvaccinated (the balance is single dosed).

- That is, the 85% of the population who are double vaxxed make up 7% of new cases. This has been consistent for some time. Without question the vaccines are effective at reducing transmission.

- 6.67% of those in hospital and 4% of those in ICU are double vaxxed. That is, the 15% of people who are not fully vaccinated make up 93% of those in hospital and 96% of those in intensive care. They also make up 93% of new cases.

- When NSW opened up after 100 days of lockdown, the 7-day average was 560 cases per day

- 6 of the last 10 days the cases have been under 300.

Exactly how overwhelming do people want the numbers to be, to show the community benefit in vaccinations?

Blah blah blah. That’s wonderful. You can make a choice and we can make a choice. You don’t make our choice.

If these vaccines were that great, like polio, NOBODY would be concerned about someone else taking them. That’s 1.2-if Covid was as serious as you say, illegal immigrant carriers of the virus would not be ignored.