Auburn's underclassmen are running great. They've essentially gotten nothing from their Seniors. One good race from Howard; Brady and Czyz have been no-shows to-date.
What do these top programs do for training? My son goes to a fairly large public school in NY and their team is not anywhere close to these top teams. How do you average 13:27? I think our top 5 were between 14:30 and 15:30. Now, this year is a down year for us and we had 1 senior. Still though, even if they all improve a min over the next year it’s not close. Last year in one of the letter races we had 2 in the top 5 but those 2 kids were very very gifted.
My son’s team probably averages about 25-35 miles per week (most kids don’t run over the summer). I assume these top programs hammer out 50-70 a week? Is that what it takes? How do these teams do that? At my sons school the coaches need everyone to run together and they have to be done by like 5. Practice doesn’t get going until after 4:00 once announcements, warmup and stretching is done. Just don’t understand.
The teams gotta be running year around as well to be competitive. Can’t go into cross season not having run much since last fall. If it’s a large school they should have an indoor and outdoor track program. Good way to keep building fitness and speed outside of xc season.
If you trust the speed ratings both Ithaca and Auburn have performed much better at every other meet. Even if you don't trust the speed ratings it's evident that both teams suffered; 13:27 avg from Ithaca and 13:22 avg from Auburn. Really not very good considering what they've shown earlier in the season.
If you trust the speed ratings both Ithaca and Auburn have performed much better at every other meet. Even if you don't trust the speed ratings it's evident that both teams suffered; 13:27 avg from Ithaca and 13:22 avg from Auburn. Really not very good considering what they've shown earlier in the season.
Based on speed ratings, seems like Fairport didn’t perform at Manhattan as well as McQuaid. Last year they were getting worse as the season went on too
If you trust the speed ratings both Ithaca and Auburn have performed much better at every other meet. Even if you don't trust the speed ratings it's evident that both teams suffered; 13:27 avg from Ithaca and 13:22 avg from Auburn. Really not very good considering what they've shown earlier in the season.
Based on speed ratings, seems like Fairport didn’t perform at Manhattan as well as McQuaid. Last year they were getting worse as the season went on too
Based on speed ratings, seems like Fairport didn’t perform at Manhattan as well as McQuaid. Last year they were getting worse as the season went on too
Monroe Woodbury finished only a few points behind Fairport at the Burnt Hills invite, and they are that far apart from each other? St. Anthony’s literally beat Auburn and Ithaca at Manhattan head-to-head, and yet St A. is ranked behind them.
It\'s been two weeks since our last update, and a lot has happened. A lot more rain downstate, that is. But in the meantime, Manhattan and Burnt Hills has come a
It\'s been two weeks since our last update, and a lot has happened. A lot more rain downstate, that is. But in the meantime, Manhattan and Burnt Hills has come a
Whoever makes these rankings needs to fix the list of runners. He hasn’t updated it since week 1 and it’s extremely inaccurate. And some of them are flat out wrong. Commacks listed runners are actually Ward Melvilles.
This post was edited 3 minutes after it was posted.
Fairport, Auburn, and Ithaca have had much better races than they did this weekend, neither MW or St. A have performed near as well as the top 3 have earlier in the season.