Yep. What a loser. He screamed, "I have not yet begun to fight!" and then sat there and said nothing during the sentencing. F*cking loser.
Then afterwards he said (not needing to report to prison until his appeals are over) that Merrick Garland was going to be removed from office. Bullsh!t.
A sh!t stain on American history along with Trump.
There's a high probability that Garland is impeached and Bannon wins his appeal.
On what grounds do you think Bannon can get his conviction reversed on appeal? I'm betting you were not (and still are not) aware of a single ground that Bannon plans to set forth on appeal when you typed that there is a high probability that "Bannon wins his appeal."
There is almost zero possibility that Bannon gets any kind of reversal on appeal. This was an easy contempt case -- he was duly served a subpoena and publicly defied it. He made whatever factual and legal arguments could excuse that. Then he was convicted by a jury.
What grounds do you believe Bannon will be able to reverse, in whole or in part, his conviction by a jury on contempt counts? You don't have any in mind, do you?
Yep. What a loser. He screamed, "I have not yet begun to fight!" and then sat there and said nothing during the sentencing. F*cking loser.
Then afterwards he said (not needing to report to prison until his appeals are over) that Merrick Garland was going to be removed from office. Bullsh!t.
A sh!t stain on American history along with Trump.
There's a high probability that Garland is impeached and Bannon wins his appeal.
1) Garland will NOT be removed from office.
2) Bannon WILL spend prison time. He may get it knocked down a tad from the 4 months, but he will spend time behind bars.
There's a high probability that Garland is impeached and Bannon wins his appeal.
On what grounds do you think Bannon can get his conviction reversed on appeal? I'm betting you were not (and still are not) aware of a single ground that Bannon plans to set forth on appeal when you typed that there is a high probability that "Bannon wins his appeal."
There is almost zero possibility that Bannon gets any kind of reversal on appeal. This was an easy contempt case -- he was duly served a subpoena and publicly defied it. He made whatever factual and legal arguments could excuse that. Then he was convicted by a jury.
What grounds do you believe Bannon will be able to reverse, in whole or in part, his conviction by a jury on contempt counts? You don't have any in mind, do you?
Simple. On January 3rd, 2023, the January 6th witch trials are a thing of the past. Hard to hold someone in contempt of hearings that are no longer taking place.
There's a high probability that Garland is impeached and Bannon wins his appeal.
On what grounds do you think Bannon can get his conviction reversed on appeal? I'm betting you were not (and still are not) aware of a single ground that Bannon plans to set forth on appeal when you typed that there is a high probability that "Bannon wins his appeal."
There is almost zero possibility that Bannon gets any kind of reversal on appeal. This was an easy contempt case -- he was duly served a subpoena and publicly defied it. He made whatever factual and legal arguments could excuse that. Then he was convicted by a jury.
What grounds do you believe Bannon will be able to reverse, in whole or in part, his conviction by a jury on contempt counts? You don't have any in mind, do you?
Bannon will not escape prison time. The ONLY shot he has is getting a reduced sentence from the 4 months he got. His lawyers might look at equivalent cases to try to make a case for a shorter sentence, but the MINIMUM he will have to face is 30 days behind bars...he will not escape that...no house arrest like that f*cking two-shirt wearing baby wants.
On what grounds do you think Bannon can get his conviction reversed on appeal? I'm betting you were not (and still are not) aware of a single ground that Bannon plans to set forth on appeal when you typed that there is a high probability that "Bannon wins his appeal."
There is almost zero possibility that Bannon gets any kind of reversal on appeal. This was an easy contempt case -- he was duly served a subpoena and publicly defied it. He made whatever factual and legal arguments could excuse that. Then he was convicted by a jury.
What grounds do you believe Bannon will be able to reverse, in whole or in part, his conviction by a jury on contempt counts? You don't have any in mind, do you?
Simple. On January 3rd, 2023, the January 6th witch trials are a thing of the past. Hard to hold someone in contempt of hearings that are no longer taking place.
There's a high probability that Garland is impeached and Bannon wins his appeal.
1) Garland will NOT be removed from office.
2) Bannon WILL spend prison time. He may get it knocked down a tad from the 4 months, but he will spend time behind bars.
This of course is not true. Only being reported by an entertainment rag owned by Murdock. This is not a news, only propaganda via uninformed Trump Taliban. Notice this report sights an Iranian national. Iran at this time is engaged in concert with Russian forces in the Crimean to support the Putin land grab.
Given your posted name it is clear you have a twisted view of yourself and your patriotism. In the United States facism is not patriotism. Stop lying.
And the majority of R candidates deny the 2020 election was valid.
No they don't. Unless every person who ever said "we should do a recount in Arizona" is now an "election denier," which is stupid.
"We should do a recount" or "we are just asking questions" or " we just want secure and valid elections" are what these guys say publicly. When they are among the base it is the full blown, stop the steal BS that Trump was peddling.
And the majority of R candidates deny the 2020 election was valid.
No they don't. Unless every person who ever said "we should do a recount in Arizona" is now an "election denier," which is stupid.
You really shouldn't sugarcoat or shrug on this. What you and they are doing is deadly to a democracy.
A majority of Republican nominees on the ballot this November for the House, Senate and key statewide offices — 291 in all — have denied or questioned the outcome of the last presidential election, according to a Washington Post analysis.
Candidates who have challenged or refused to accept Joe Biden’s victory — 51 percent of the 569 analyzed by The Washington Post — are running in every region of the country and in nearly every state. Republican voters in two states nominated election deniers in all federal and statewide races The Post examined.
Although some are running in heavily Democratic areas and are expected to lose, most of the election deniers nominated are likely to win: Of the nearly 300 on the ballot, 171 are running for safely Republican seats. Another 48 will appear on the ballot in tightly contested races.
Among 569 GOP candidates who advanced to the general election in key races for statewide and federal office, 53 percent have denied the 2020 election result.
No they don't. Unless every person who ever said "we should do a recount in Arizona" is now an "election denier," which is stupid.
You really shouldn't sugarcoat or shrug on this. What you and they are doing is deadly to a democracy.
A majority of Republican nominees on the ballot this November for the House, Senate and key statewide offices — 291 in all — have denied or questioned the outcome of the last presidential election, according to a Washington Post analysis.
Candidates who have challenged or refused to accept Joe Biden’s victory — 51 percent of the 569 analyzed by The Washington Post — are running in every region of the country and in nearly every state. Republican voters in two states nominated election deniers in all federal and statewide races The Post examined.
Although some are running in heavily Democratic areas and are expected to lose, most of the election deniers nominated are likely to win: Of the nearly 300 on the ballot, 171 are running for safely Republican seats. Another 48 will appear on the ballot in tightly contested races.
A pay wall, are you freaking kidding me? A dire threat to democracy, but only for premium subscribers?
I need a list of candidates, so I can cross-check the ones I'm familiar with, along with an audit trail to the supposed "election denier" comments. And if it's paywalled, I'm going to assume it's partisan rube bait and not anything Americans should be concerned about.
You really shouldn't sugarcoat or shrug on this. What you and they are doing is deadly to a democracy.
A majority of Republican nominees on the ballot this November for the House, Senate and key statewide offices — 291 in all — have denied or questioned the outcome of the last presidential election, according to a Washington Post analysis.
Candidates who have challenged or refused to accept Joe Biden’s victory — 51 percent of the 569 analyzed by The Washington Post — are running in every region of the country and in nearly every state. Republican voters in two states nominated election deniers in all federal and statewide races The Post examined.
Although some are running in heavily Democratic areas and are expected to lose, most of the election deniers nominated are likely to win: Of the nearly 300 on the ballot, 171 are running for safely Republican seats. Another 48 will appear on the ballot in tightly contested races.
A pay wall, are you freaking kidding me? A dire threat to democracy, but only for premium subscribers?
I need a list of candidates, so I can cross-check the ones I'm familiar with, along with an audit trail to the supposed "election denier" comments. And if it's paywalled, I'm going to assume it's partisan rube bait and not anything Americans should be concerned about.
I gifted the link - it should work for you
Sure, there's a spectrum of election deniers. but it all goes in the same direction: saying 'we can't trust democracy anymore and the other side is cheating so we have to cheat too . 'That's the message the rubes are hearing and taking to heart.
A pay wall, are you freaking kidding me? A dire threat to democracy, but only for premium subscribers?
I need a list of candidates, so I can cross-check the ones I'm familiar with, along with an audit trail to the supposed "election denier" comments. And if it's paywalled, I'm going to assume it's partisan rube bait and not anything Americans should be concerned about.
I gifted the link - it should work for you
Sure, there's a spectrum of election deniers. but it all goes in the same direction: saying 'we can't trust democracy anymore and the other side is cheating so we have to cheat too . 'That's the message the rubes are hearing and taking to heart.
Thanks for the working link, but it still won't let me use the interactive lookup to see who is who. And if the offending comments are innocuous things like "we should do a recount in Arizona," that is no different from incessand Democrat complaints about voter suppression, Russian hacking, doubts cast on electronic voting machines, calls for recount in Minnesota in 2016, etc etc etc. That's just part of democracy.
There's a high probability that Garland is impeached and Bannon wins his appeal.
On what grounds do you think Bannon can get his conviction reversed on appeal? I'm betting you were not (and still are not) aware of a single ground that Bannon plans to set forth on appeal when you typed that there is a high probability that "Bannon wins his appeal."
There is almost zero possibility that Bannon gets any kind of reversal on appeal. This was an easy contempt case -- he was duly served a subpoena and publicly defied it. He made whatever factual and legal arguments could excuse that. Then he was convicted by a jury.
What grounds do you believe Bannon will be able to reverse, in whole or in part, his conviction by a jury on contempt counts? You don't have any in mind, do you?
On the grounds of historical precedent. Obama officials ignored congressional subpoenas all the time and never even got fined let alone jail time. Eric Holder was voted to be in contempt of congress by a 255-67 bipartisan vote in 2012 for refusing to testify about his Fast and Furious arms dealing scandal. Obama's DoJ refused to prosecute because he was a Democrat.
IT might seem shocking that huge numbers of GOP politicians still claim the election was stolen. But if you step back it really isn't all that surprising. They know that the election was not stolen. They are just saying this because they want to retain power and money.
So why would we be surprised that a majority of GOP are willing to lie to retain power? The have been doing this for decades with many issues. A GOP favorite is always supply side economics even though it has been proven a lie since forever.
You really shouldn't sugarcoat or shrug on this. What you and they are doing is deadly to a democracy.
A majority of Republican nominees on the ballot this November for the House, Senate and key statewide offices — 291 in all — have denied or questioned the outcome of the last presidential election, according to a Washington Post analysis.
Candidates who have challenged or refused to accept Joe Biden’s victory — 51 percent of the 569 analyzed by The Washington Post — are running in every region of the country and in nearly every state. Republican voters in two states nominated election deniers in all federal and statewide races The Post examined.
Although some are running in heavily Democratic areas and are expected to lose, most of the election deniers nominated are likely to win: Of the nearly 300 on the ballot, 171 are running for safely Republican seats. Another 48 will appear on the ballot in tightly contested races.
Oh no. Some people actually had the wherewithal to question some questionable mail-in results? The gall of some people. Most people vote their pocketbook. COVID turned the 2020 election for the Democrats. Inflation fueled by Democratic policies are what will turn it for the Republicans in 2022. Everything else is just a distraction.
IT might seem shocking that huge numbers of GOP politicians still claim the election was stolen. But if you step back it really isn't all that surprising. They know that the election was not stolen. They are just saying this because they want to retain power and money.
So why would we be surprised that a majority of GOP are willing to lie to retain power? The have been doing this for decades with many issues. A GOP favorite is always supply side economics even though it has been proven a lie since forever.
You have no idea if the election was stolen or not.
It's impossible to know because corrupt Democrats in states like PA made it impossible to validate mail in ballots.
Supply side economics has never been proven a lie that just a slogan morons repeat without evidence...
Sure, there's a spectrum of election deniers. but it all goes in the same direction: saying 'we can't trust democracy anymore and the other side is cheating so we have to cheat too . 'That's the message the rubes are hearing and taking to heart.
Thanks for the working link, but it still won't let me use the interactive lookup to see who is who. And if the offending comments are innocuous things like "we should do a recount in Arizona," that is no different from incessand Democrat complaints about voter suppression, Russian hacking, doubts cast on electronic voting machines, calls for recount in Minnesota in 2016, etc etc etc. That's just part of democracy.
you are being naive and willfully ignorant. A main tenet of the Republican Party is that the 2020 election was stolen. There is no such equivalent believe in the Democratic Party.
Thanks for the working link, but it still won't let me use the interactive lookup to see who is who. And if the offending comments are innocuous things like "we should do a recount in Arizona," that is no different from incessand Democrat complaints about voter suppression, Russian hacking, doubts cast on electronic voting machines, calls for recount in Minnesota in 2016, etc etc etc. That's just part of democracy.
you are being naive and willfully ignorant. A main tenet of the Republican Party is that the 2020 election was stolen. There is no such equivalent believe in the Democratic Party.
I'm asking for citations on what these 299 candidates said. If someone affirmatively said the 2020 election was stolen, that's a problem. If someone says they just want an election audit here or better election security there, that's not a problem and something both parties do.
