How do you liberals explain what happened? It was literally impossible for Trump to survive that attempt on his life, yet here he was days later giving a speech before millions. He even said himself that there is no way he would be alive without god's hand.
There's literally no such thing as coincidents, and no such thing as accidents. Inexplicable things don't just happen because of "luck." They happen for a reason.
The only true part of your post is “there’s literally no such thing as coincidents.” It is not a word. Otherwise you are engaging in seemingly unfounded speculation, which is fine, but understand it is your uneducated opinion.
Ofie said there's no such thing as "coincidents" - absolutely true if a word is a thing.
there's a billion trillion stars in the universe. Each star has planets. Some planets will have life. We are on one of those stars. There are 8 billion of us on this planet.
Do you really think that an invisible sky creature would peer through the awesomeness of the universe to look out for the corrupt, fraudulent rapist that is donald trump? Do you not think that she would have better things to do?
Hello, Captain Moonbeam. I'm not quite sure what the number of stars in the universe has to do with anything I've posted. Do you know how many grains of sand are in Daytona Beach? Do you know how many nits are in a brood? What's the world record for meringue pie eating? These are like Jeopardy questions. They are not pertinent.
I'm wondering if you are stoned on the pot. It's 9 AM on a Monday, for goodness sakes. Is this "business as usual for you"? It's no wonder your secular life is a shambles.
there's a billion trillion stars in the universe. Each star has planets. Some planets will have life. We are on one of those stars. There are 8 billion of us on this planet.
Do you really think that an invisible sky creature would peer through the awesomeness of the universe to look out for the corrupt, fraudulent rapist that is donald trump? Do you not think that she would have better things to do?
That is an assumption.
You are free to make assumptions, of course. But it is odd to present your assumptions as fact when you don't have a shred of evidence to support them.
You mean like the assumption that a deity exists that cared to save the life of the 34 times convicted felon and adjudicated rapist? What is the "shred of evidence" for that?
You are free to make assumptions, of course. But it is odd to present your assumptions as fact when you don't have a shred of evidence to support them.
You mean like the assumption that a deity exists that cared to save the life of the 34 times convicted felon and adjudicated rapist? What is the "shred of evidence" for that?
The evidence is in the overwhelming odds against Trump surviving this attempt on his life. You can't account for that, other than by resorting to your secular atheism which denies the existence of god in anything. You aren't arguing facts. You're assuming them into existence, despite all evidence to the contrary, then asking rhetorical questions that are no more than tautologies. Posters have been employing that illogical device since page 1. You're very late to the secular congregation, and your performance is poor.