Armstronglivs wrote:
I don't buy that Kenyan athletes are too dumb to know what they are doing.
You seem to be overestimating your own intelligence though. Or maybe you just love to argue?
Armstronglivs wrote:
I don't buy that Kenyan athletes are too dumb to know what they are doing.
You seem to be overestimating your own intelligence though. Or maybe you just love to argue?
extend the philosophy wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
I don't buy that Kenyan athletes are too dumb to know what they are doing.
You seem to be overestimating your own intelligence though. Or maybe you just love to argue?
I might direct that question back to you.
Renato Canova wrote:
In some case doped athletes want to avoid the test, but in several other cases NOT doped athletes are not aware of their must, if professional athletes.
Put in your mind that life is very much different between Kenya and US or Europe. While can be easy to control athletes when are in training camp, the mentality of many among best Kenyans ias no longer professional when they are at home, and their life depends, meny times, on situations out of their control.
In my opinion, there is difference between Coleman, not at home in a big town because in the supermarket during the hour of whereabouts, and somebody who never filled personally his whereabouts (in almost all the cases of whereabouts failures with Kenyans, are their managements filling the form) and is not able to put in his mind that you must be professional ALWAYS, not only while you run.
AK, and specifically Barnabas Korir, are trying to educate the athletes, but too many times they are not really interested to understand and to learn. For example, AK provides each athlete with bundles of 500 Ksh each lesson, lasting one hour, that are done weekly. AIU nominates athletes to take part, but only 50% went to participate, and only 1% asked some question.
So, the reason is not "Doping", but "Ignorance". The idea of many Kenyans (not only athletes) living in the rural areas that they can do what they feel to do at the moment (for example, disappearing without informing anybody for going to the village for meeting their children, something not planned but decided 10 minutes before), is connected with the type of life Kenyans had for thousands years, when the idea of personal freedom was at the base of the individual behavior.
Generally, Africans are not still able to follow the rules of international bodies, if don't allow them to do what they want, because there is not yet a full integration in the global World.
But I'm sure that 90% of the cases are not for hiding something, but only for superficiality, ignorance and, sometimes, arrogance (I'm one of the local heroes, so I can do what I want).
This doesn't change the fact they have to be banned, if not able to show the reason af the missed test, and AK is very clear to explain rules and sanctions.
For that reason, it's absolutely absurd and not correct to ask the ban for the Country, that at the moment is the most active against doping, in both the efforts for educating and preventing, and for catching cheaters and superficial athletes not following the rules.
Okay...let me get this straight: Athletes in other countries, say the Slavic nations, European countries, U.S., etc., who are charged with a whereabouts violation could, and maybe even probably, have been intentionally missing the tests for reasons of doping. So, the reasoning would be something like this: Take the 2-yr hit instead of the more than likely career ending 4-yr hit for a doping positive, come back after the ban and get your doping program right this time so as to test negative on OOC testing.
The Kenyans, OTOH, you say in "90%" of the cases are not hiding anything but are missing the testing window for "ignorance" and sometimes "arrogance." "90%" is very high figure to say there's no attempt of the athlete to intentionally miss the testing window because of they're on a doping program and aren't aware of glow times and washout periods.
Well then, why not make the Kenyans exempt from any whereabouts failure violations? If it's impossible for many of them to be available for testing at a certain time frame because of ignorance then just forget about any violations. If testers can find them and the athlete agrees to submit to a test then great. If not, the testers can just leave and maybe give it a college try sometime in the future. Or maybe just exempt them from any OOC testing until they are educated on how OOC testing & the whereabouts protocol works. If they still don't understand, then don't bother testing them.
We really don't want innocent Kenyans banned for whereabouts failure violations when they only did it out of ignorance and you have assured us that "90%" of them would never avoid testing because they're are doping. We can save those suspicions on the Americans, Europeans, Slavics & N. Africans because they would be more likely to intentionally miss tests for nefarious reasons. Lol.
At first, there is a difference of individual talent. When we speak of Kenenisa, of Shaheen, of Haile, of Tirunesh Dibaba, of Beatrice Chepkoech, or, in other events, of Usain Bolt, or Edwin Moses, we speak of "freak of nature", who absolutely didn't need any external help for being, at their best, at the top of the world.
Secondly, there is a big difference depending on the training system. Several times we had athletes (especially Africans) wo are already of high international level, in spite of a very poor coaching and the lack of physiotherapic supports. These athletes, when finally approach a professional and well organised situation, including training camps (they finally can eat twice per day) and coaches of international level, can produce big jumps of quality (for example, 2:07 in Marathon can become 2:03, or 3'33" in 1500m can become something better than 3'30").
Compare long distances with sprint. The real money is in the sprint events : there are more opportunity to compete, are still in DL (long distances are cancelled), there are higher contracts from the Companies, there is more interest from the TV, and generally every top athlete has a very high medical support, something that doesn't happen with middle distances, where the best are Kenyan, Ethiopian and Ugandan. So said, how is that in top 100 of 100m almost 50% of the athletes had some problem with doping, while in marathon only 3 had problems (in spite of the fact that at the moment the athletes more tested are specialists of long distances, in order to have data enough for creating their Biological Passport) ?
Armstronglivs wrote:
rekrunner wrote:
You are using an imaginary hypothetical to "see why it exists".
It looks to me like self-projection of your own bad faith.
You are aware that altitude-trained athletes also dope?
I'm aware that happens sometimes. As I said before, my main focus is on causes of performance.
nikkinemo95 wrote:
At first, there is a difference of individual talent. When we speak of Kenenisa, of Shaheen, of Haile, of Tirunesh Dibaba, of Beatrice Chepkoech, or, in other events, of Usain Bolt, or Edwin Moses, we speak of "freak of nature", who absolutely didn't need any external help for being, at their best, at the top of the world.
Secondly, there is a big difference depending on the training system. Several times we had athletes (especially Africans) wo are already of high international level, in spite of a very poor coaching and the lack of physiotherapic supports. These athletes, when finally approach a professional and well organised situation, including training camps (they finally can eat twice per day) and coaches of international level, can produce big jumps of quality (for example, 2:07 in Marathon can become 2:03, or 3'33" in 1500m can become something better than 3'30").
Compare long distances with sprint. The real money is in the sprint events : there are more opportunity to compete, are still in DL (long distances are cancelled), there are higher contracts from the Companies, there is more interest from the TV, and generally every top athlete has a very high medical support, something that doesn't happen with middle distances, where the best are Kenyan, Ethiopian and Ugandan. So said, how is that in top 100 of 100m almost 50% of the athletes had some problem with doping, while in marathon only 3 had problems (in spite of the fact that at the moment the athletes more tested are specialists of long distances, in order to have data enough for creating their Biological Passport) ?
I'm often being taken to task for being less knowledgable than most in these discussions, but I can spot a lot of nonsense in your post.Are you really saying that marathon runners, who only compete 2 or 3 times a year, and most of te elite based in Ethiopia and Kenya, are tested more than DL sprinters???
I'm not going to bother checking your claim about only 3 of the top 100 marathoners being busted, butvjustvin the last year from the only country in East Africa that has a semblance of testing - Wanaijuru, Kipsang, Kiptum.
Yeah Bekele, El G, Ngeny, Kipchoge, Komen all freaks of nature that entirely coincidentally all burst on to the scene ag the height of the EPO era but were the only runners in history who wouldn't have any need for it, because they were 1 in a billion genetic freaks.
What's that I see on the news? Another Kenyan world champion suspended today? Yawn.
Renato Canova wrote:
In some case doped athletes want to avoid the test, but in several other cases NOT doped athletes are not aware of their must, if professional athletes.
Put in your mind that life is very much different between Kenya and US or Europe. While can be easy to control athletes when are in training camp, the mentality of many among best Kenyans ias no longer professional when they are at home, and their life depends, meny times, on situations out of their control.
In my opinion, there is difference between Coleman, not at home in a big town because in the supermarket during the hour of whereabouts, and somebody who never filled personally his whereabouts (in almost all the cases of whereabouts failures with Kenyans, are their managements filling the form) and is not able to put in his mind that you must be professional ALWAYS, not only while you run.
AK, and specifically Barnabas Korir, are trying to educate the athletes, but too many times they are not really interested to understand and to learn. For example, AK provides each athlete with bundles of 500 Ksh each lesson, lasting one hour, that are done weekly. AIU nominates athletes to take part, but only 50% went to participate, and only 1% asked some question.
So, the reason is not "Doping", but "Ignorance". The idea of many Kenyans (not only athletes) living in the rural areas that they can do what they feel to do at the moment (for example, disappearing without informing anybody for going to the village for meeting their children, something not planned but decided 10 minutes before), is connected with the type of life Kenyans had for thousands years, when the idea of personal freedom was at the base of the individual behavior.
Generally, Africans are not still able to follow the rules of international bodies, if don't allow them to do what they want, because there is not yet a full integration in the global World.
But I'm sure that 90% of the cases are not for hiding something, but only for superficiality, ignorance and, sometimes, arrogance (I'm one of the local heroes, so I can do what I want).
This doesn't change the fact they have to be banned, if not able to show the reason af the missed test, and AK is very clear to explain rules and sanctions.
For that reason, it's absolutely absurd and not correct to ask the ban for the Country, that at the moment is the most active against doping, in both the efforts for educating and preventing, and for catching cheaters and superficial athletes not following the rules.
There is another problem connected to this that we haven't highlighted here in this thread. When
a doper is caught it's non existent or very rare that a proper examination is made regarding the runner's management or coach to find out if they have been the spider in the net behind the doping.It can't be ruled out that the management companies in particular have great power over the runner. '' You take this vitamin injection which is good for your shape and then you will be ready for the races I promised you.... '' As you say the African runners are often ( not always understood) low educted and only interested in getting to the races abroad to create a good economic future at all costs.
Doped to the Max wrote:
Renato Canova wrote:
In some case doped athletes want to avoid the test, but in several other cases NOT doped athletes are not aware of their must, if professional athletes.
Put in your mind that life is very much different between Kenya and US or Europe. While can be easy to control athletes when are in training camp, the mentality of many among best Kenyans ias no longer professional when they are at home, and their life depends, meny times, on situations out of their control.
In my opinion, there is difference between Coleman, not at home in a big town because in the supermarket during the hour of whereabouts, and somebody who never filled personally his whereabouts (in almost all the cases of whereabouts failures with Kenyans, are their managements filling the form) and is not able to put in his mind that you must be professional ALWAYS, not only while you run.
AK, and specifically Barnabas Korir, are trying to educate the athletes, but too many times they are not really interested to understand and to learn. For example, AK provides each athlete with bundles of 500 Ksh each lesson, lasting one hour, that are done weekly. AIU nominates athletes to take part, but only 50% went to participate, and only 1% asked some question.
So, the reason is not "Doping", but "Ignorance". The idea of many Kenyans (not only athletes) living in the rural areas that they can do what they feel to do at the moment (for example, disappearing without informing anybody for going to the village for meeting their children, something not planned but decided 10 minutes before), is connected with the type of life Kenyans had for thousands years, when the idea of personal freedom was at the base of the individual behavior.
Generally, Africans are not still able to follow the rules of international bodies, if don't allow them to do what they want, because there is not yet a full integration in the global World.
But I'm sure that 90% of the cases are not for hiding something, but only for superficiality, ignorance and, sometimes, arrogance (I'm one of the local heroes, so I can do what I want).
This doesn't change the fact they have to be banned, if not able to show the reason af the missed test, and AK is very clear to explain rules and sanctions.
For that reason, it's absolutely absurd and not correct to ask the ban for the Country, that at the moment is the most active against doping, in both the efforts for educating and preventing, and for catching cheaters and superficial athletes not following the rules.
Okay...let me get this straight: Athletes in other countries, say the Slavic nations, European countries, U.S., etc., who are charged with a whereabouts violation could, and maybe even probably, have been intentionally missing the tests for reasons of doping. So, the reasoning would be something like this: Take the 2-yr hit instead of the more than likely career ending 4-yr hit for a doping positive, come back after the ban and get your doping program right this time so as to test negative on OOC testing.
The Kenyans, OTOH, you say in "90%" of the cases are not hiding anything but are missing the testing window for "ignorance" and sometimes "arrogance." "90%" is very high figure to say there's no attempt of the athlete to intentionally miss the testing window because of they're on a doping program and aren't aware of glow times and washout periods.
Well then, why not make the Kenyans exempt from any whereabouts failure violations? If it's impossible for many of them to be available for testing at a certain time frame because of ignorance then just forget about any violations. If testers can find them and the athlete agrees to submit to a test then great. If not, the testers can just leave and maybe give it a college try sometime in the future. Or maybe just exempt them from any OOC testing until they are educated on how OOC testing & the whereabouts protocol works. If they still don't understand, then don't bother testing them.
We really don't want innocent Kenyans banned for whereabouts failure violations when they only did it out of ignorance and you have assured us that "90%" of them would never avoid testing because they're are doping. We can save those suspicions on the Americans, Europeans, Slavics & N. Africans because they would be more likely to intentionally miss tests for nefarious reasons. Lol.
I enjoyed that.
Doped to the Max wrote:
Okay...let me get this straight: Athletes in other countries, say the Slavic nations, European countries, U.S., etc., who are charged with a whereabouts violation could, and maybe even probably, have been intentionally missing the tests for reasons of doping.
Maybe. Or maybe not. Hard to say if it is probable.
This kind of thing used to happen in cycling 15-20 years ago.
All we can really say is that a whereabouts failure is a filing failure, or a missed test.
rekrunner wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
You are aware that altitude-trained athletes also dope?
I'm aware that happens sometimes. As I said before, my main focus is on causes of performance.
But they never include doping. Not if you can help it.
rekrunner wrote:
Doped to the Max wrote:
Okay...let me get this straight: Athletes in other countries, say the Slavic nations, European countries, U.S., etc., who are charged with a whereabouts violation could, and maybe even probably, have been intentionally missing the tests for reasons of doping.
Maybe. Or maybe not. Hard to say if it is probable.
This kind of thing used to happen in cycling 15-20 years ago.
All we can really say is that a whereabouts failure is a filing failure, or a missed test.
No, we can say more than that. 3 of them are an anti-doping rule violation. If it wasn't so dopers could duck tests with impunity. 3 strikes and you're out. Same outcome as a positive test. Both processes are aimed to call dopers to account.
rekrunner wrote:
Doped to the Max wrote:
Okay...let me get this straight: Athletes in other countries, say the Slavic nations, European countries, U.S., etc., who are charged with a whereabouts violation could, and maybe even probably, have been intentionally missing the tests for reasons of doping.
Maybe. Or maybe not. Hard to say if it is probable.
This kind of thing used to happen in cycling 15-20 years ago.
All we can really say is that a whereabouts failure is a filing failure, or a missed test.
I don't think it's hard to say - it's a high probability that they're dodging the tests because they think they will test positive. Look at the outcomes if a doper takes a chance submitting to a test and comes up positive vs dodging the tests. A positive is 4-yr ban and in these days could easily be career ending. Certainly the athlete's reputation is tarnished and their sponsor will drop them like a hot potato and more than likely want all the $$$ back.
Serving a 2-yr ban (sometimes less) for a whereabouts failures is nothing. The athlete isn't charged with a doping offense so they can maintain that they're not a doper intentionally avoiding tests. They can claim that they got their time frames all mixed up, or their doorbell was broken and they didn't hear any knocking, or their cell phone went dead and on and on and on. So, they serve the 2-yr ban and come back to the sport with their fan base welcoming them back with open arms.
The whereabouts failures is a life raft for a doper. Lol.
I see you saying it -- so I guess it is easy to say -- but see no reason to think that it is highly probable like you say.
But Doped to the Max gave you a couple of reasons. I see them.
rekrunner wrote:
I see you saying it -- so I guess it is easy to say -- but see no reason to think that it is highly probable like you say.
You see what you want to see - unlike others who can see what is there.
Doped to the Max wrote:
rekrunner wrote:
Maybe. Or maybe not. Hard to say if it is probable.
This kind of thing used to happen in cycling 15-20 years ago.
All we can really say is that a whereabouts failure is a filing failure, or a missed test.
I don't think it's hard to say - it's a high probability that they're dodging the tests because they think they will test positive. Look at the outcomes if a doper takes a chance submitting to a test and comes up positive vs dodging the tests. A positive is 4-yr ban and in these days could easily be career ending. Certainly the athlete's reputation is tarnished and their sponsor will drop them like a hot potato and more than likely want all the $$$ back.
Serving a 2-yr ban (sometimes less) for a whereabouts failures is nothing. The athlete isn't charged with a doping offense so they can maintain that they're not a doper intentionally avoiding tests. They can claim that they got their time frames all mixed up, or their doorbell was broken and they didn't hear any knocking, or their cell phone went dead and on and on and on. So, they serve the 2-yr ban and come back to the sport with their fan base welcoming them back with open arms.
The whereabouts failures is a life raft for a doper. Lol.
Do you really think so? Who but rekrunner thinks it's merely a technical infringement and they weren't doping? All Mo had to do was not hear the doorbell and people are convinced he was a doper.
casual obsever wrote:
But Doped to the Max gave you a couple of reasons. I see them.
They look like low probability reasons.
Armstronglivs wrote:
Do you really think so? Who but rekrunner thinks it's merely a technical infringement and they weren't doping? All Mo had to do was not hear the doorbell and people are convinced he was a doper.
Like me, WADA also thinks a whereabouts failure is a non-analytical ADRV. If the athletes were doping, the athletes would be charged under Article 2.1 (presence) or Article 2.2 (use or attempted use).
If people are convinced that not hearing a doorbell equates to doping, you are not really appealing to the most critical or the most neutral thinkers.
rekrunner wrote:
Like me, WADA also thinks a whereabouts failure is a non-analytical ADRV.
Yes. But unlike you, WADA does not state "that a whereabouts failure is a filing failure". Those are your words, designed to downplay the offense of three whereabouts failures despite its standard ban of two years. They are also wrong: for example not hearing the doorbell or running away from the tester are not filing failures.
Unlike you, WADA calls every anti-doping rule violation a "doping case", as already proven to you.
On the contrary, I call a whereabouts failure exactly as defined by WADA, often quoting WADA's definition.
It can be a "filing failure" or a "missed test". These are not just my words, but virtually every ADA's and ADO's words.
I right-play the offense as one that can be committed by dopers and non-dopers alike.
Some of WADA's "doping cases" do not necessarily involving an athlete doping.
If you can think WADA is wrong about doorbells and running away, then I also think it is wrong to call these potential anti-doping rule violations "doping cases", but rather "anti-doping cases".
After all, WADA is an anti-doping association, not a doping association.
Does not wanting my kids to watch a bisexual threesome at the Olympics make me a bigot?
No scholarship limits anymore! (NCAA Track and Field inequality is going to get way worse, right?)
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
Gudaf Tsegay will not race the 10000m? Just to spite the federation?