You are so stupid. Democrats do not think that Trump stole the election in 2016. We absolutely do know that the 2020 election was legitimate. You are a moron.
1) Liberals have used the words far, far too freely my whole life. Way too many thoughtful, decent non-minorities have been called these things for reasonably - and indeed often quite mildly - disagreeing on social policy and in discussing social dynamics.
2) Obama's term and the subsequent Trump era proved that there is more racism in American society than I thought was present. That still doesn't forgive labeling someone as racist simply because they disagree to some extent on, say, affirmative action - which obviously continues to this day on the left. But they WERE right that there is still tons of regular ole' red-blooded racism running through red America.
But hey, not to EVER be outdone on idiocy, last week Donald decided to call the NY AG "racist" for deciding that his fat white as* was financially scummy.
She was racist long before she decided to sue your crush little man.
She's been anti-cop and pro-BLM from the start. The woman is a PIG.
But hey, not to EVER be outdone on idiocy, last week Donald decided to call the NY AG "racist" for deciding that his fat white as* was financially scummy.
She was racist long before she decided to sue your crush little man.
She's been anti-cop and pro-BLM from the start. The woman is a PIG.
At this point it is clear you have lost your marbles. Maybe you never had any.
I'll just laugh my ass off when Trump is indicted and convicted. You are in a cult. You are a moron.
Democrats think Trump and the Russians stole the 2016 election to this day...
It's been proven definitively that the Russian collusion story was complete BS.
We still have no idea if the 2020 election was legitimate.
In places like Pennsylvania they mailed ballots to everyone on the voter rolls whether they requested a ballot or not. Whether the voter actually lived at the address you mailed it to or not. Whether the voter was alive or not. And whoever received the ballot can fill it out and mail it back without even having to sign it.
Anyone who thinks that scenario is on the up and up is a F'ing moron.
You are so stupid. Democrats do not think that Trump stole the election in 2016. We absolutely do know that the 2020 election was legitimate. You are a moron.
Jesus Christ you're ignorant...
A Democrat member January 6th Commission literally protested the election and tried to stop the electors from certifying the election because Trump stole it.
A resurfaced 2017 tweet from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., has led to calls for consistency from Twitter as the social media giant continues its efforts to crack down on those skeptical of the results of the 2020 pres...
Hillary Clinton is sticking with her conviction that the 2016 presidential election was not conducted legitimately, saying the details surrounding her loss are still unclear."There was a widespread understanding that this ele...
True. I do think the words racist and racism are inadequate. There’s a lot of different types both big and small, and having one word that everyone associats with “evil” isn’t the best way to go. Adult’s definition seems to be based mostly on internal prejudice, which is essentially impossible to prove.
Some day your leftist dream of being able to prosecute thought crime will come true.
Until then, actions are what matter.
The leftist definition of "RACISM" is any form of disagreement with their beliefs. This is why morons on MSNBC say stupid things like calling Larry Elder the "black face of white supremacy"....
The left's entire platform is that the "system" is racist. If you ask a leftist to point to a law or policy that's actually racist they can't do it.
Behavior has consequences. Humans have known this was true since the beginning.
The modern left rejects this notion and believes that ANY negative circumstance in anyone's life is because of some external cause. Unless you're white of course then you just deserve it.
The only people more racist than modern Democrats were the old Democrats of segregation, Jim Crow, and slavery.
When I was researching over the weekend for the race argument, I came across an interesting video that solidified a lot of my belief in the oppression narrative. It didn’t help in the argument, but it did help me find peace in believing what I do.
This women gives a guest lecture for Harvard on how banks bought rights to the air in New York City in the 70s to limit the growth of minority voices. She breaks down in detail all of the ways in which it was racially motivated even when the official documentation had no explicit evidence of racial motivations. It appears subtle, but when examined, it’s very clear what the motivations were. Video is on this page:
The GSD's Spring 2021 Public Programs are all virtual and require registration. Click here to register for Rebecca Choi, “White Man’s Got a God Complex.”
I do think we are in a MUCH better spot in 2022 than we were in the 70s. I think focusing on class and poverty is a better angle going forward than race. The racists from the 60s and 70s will slowly die out and we can begin to slowly close the gap with an emphasis on opportunity rather than equity. Maybe, idk. Just throwing stuff out there.
Some day your leftist dream of being able to prosecute thought crime will come true.
Until then, actions are what matter.
The leftist definition of "RACISM" is any form of disagreement with their beliefs. This is why morons on MSNBC say stupid things like calling Larry Elder the "black face of white supremacy"....
The left's entire platform is that the "system" is racist. If you ask a leftist to point to a law or policy that's actually racist they can't do it.
Behavior has consequences. Humans have known this was true since the beginning.
The modern left rejects this notion and believes that ANY negative circumstance in anyone's life is because of some external cause. Unless you're white of course then you just deserve it.
The only people more racist than modern Democrats were the old Democrats of segregation, Jim Crow, and slavery.
When I was researching over the weekend for the race argument, I came across an interesting video that solidified a lot of my belief in the oppression narrative. It didn’t help in the argument, but it did help me find peace in believing what I do.
This women gives a guest lecture for Harvard on how banks bought rights to the air in New York City in the 70s to limit the growth of minority voices. She breaks down in detail all of the ways in which it was racially motivated even when the official documentation had no explicit evidence of racial motivations. It appears subtle, but when examined, it’s very clear what the motivations were. Video is on this page:
I do think we are in a MUCH better spot in 2022 than we were in the 70s. I think focusing on class and poverty is a better angle going forward than race. The racists from the 60s and 70s will slowly die out and we can begin to slowly close the gap with an emphasis on opportunity rather than equity. Maybe, idk. Just throwing stuff out there.
Improvement requires honesty.
If you have a 560 credit score and you get denied a loan it's because you have a 560 credit score not because of your skin color.
There's only 1 group in America that can complain about not getting a loan with a 560 credit score.
The financial crash in 2008 literally came about because Democrats mandated that banks give out loans based on feelings rather than credit score. When you ignore the cause of problems and focus solely on the symptoms the problem just gets worse.
She was racist long before she decided to sue your crush little man.
She's been anti-cop and pro-BLM from the start. The woman is a PIG.
At this point it is clear you have lost your marbles. Maybe you never had any.
I'll just laugh my ass off when Trump is indicted and convicted. You are in a cult. You are a moron.
"You are a moron" can be a very effective phrase when arguing with another person. But when you call EVERY person you are having a debate with a moron and use it in every post, it sort of loses its effectiveness. Maybe try to be more selective on your usage of it. A cowboy only has six bullets in his or her six-shooter. I would think it best for that cowboy to save his bullets for the Billy the Kids and the Jesse Jameses and not for the Barney Fifes.
At this point it is clear you have lost your marbles. Maybe you never had any.
I'll just laugh my ass off when Trump is indicted and convicted. You are in a cult. You are a moron.
"You are a moron" can be a very effective phrase when arguing with another person. But when you call EVERY person you are having a debate with a moron and use it in every post, it sort of loses its effectiveness. Maybe try to be more selective on your usage of it. A cowboy only has six bullets in his or her six-shooter. I would think it best for that cowboy to save his bullets for the Billy the Kids and the Jesse Jameses and not for the Barney Fifes.
Hooma makes Barney Fife look like Charles Bronson.
But hey, not to EVER be outdone on idiocy, last week Donald decided to call the NY AG "racist" for deciding that his fat white as* was financially scummy.
She was racist long before she decided to sue your crush little man.
She's been anti-cop and pro-BLM from the start. The woman is a PIG.
I wouldn't say she's racist. I think she's just trying to appease her California mega donor, Karla Jurvetson (ex-wife of a wealthy venture capitalist that was dismissed from a company for multiple sexual harassment allegations) that contributed a lot of money to her campaign when she heard she was going after Trump.
When I was researching over the weekend for the race argument, I came across an interesting video that solidified a lot of my belief in the oppression narrative. It didn’t help in the argument, but it did help me find peace in believing what I do.
This women gives a guest lecture for Harvard on how banks bought rights to the air in New York City in the 70s to limit the growth of minority voices. She breaks down in detail all of the ways in which it was racially motivated even when the official documentation had no explicit evidence of racial motivations. It appears subtle, but when examined, it’s very clear what the motivations were. Video is on this page:
I do think we are in a MUCH better spot in 2022 than we were in the 70s. I think focusing on class and poverty is a better angle going forward than race. The racists from the 60s and 70s will slowly die out and we can begin to slowly close the gap with an emphasis on opportunity rather than equity. Maybe, idk. Just throwing stuff out there.
Improvement requires honesty.
If you have a 560 credit score and you get denied a loan it's because you have a 560 credit score not because of your skin color.
There's only 1 group in America that can complain about not getting a loan with a 560 credit score.
The financial crash in 2008 literally came about because Democrats mandated that banks give out loans based on feelings rather than credit score. When you ignore the cause of problems and focus solely on the symptoms the problem just gets worse.
If I was advising an individual, I would never under any circumstances endorse blaming other people or institutions for a personal failing. As individuals, we have to learn that we are responsible for ourselves.
As a collective though, we can easily see that groups of people don’t quite have the same level of opportunity. It’s mostly class based. I think a focus on making stronger public institutions in medicine and education can raise the floor of opportunity for everyone. I have to believe there is a way to do that without causing unforeseen problems like we did with student loans.
If you have a 560 credit score and you get denied a loan it's because you have a 560 credit score not because of your skin color.
There's only 1 group in America that can complain about not getting a loan with a 560 credit score.
The financial crash in 2008 literally came about because Democrats mandated that banks give out loans based on feelings rather than credit score. When you ignore the cause of problems and focus solely on the symptoms the problem just gets worse.
If I was advising an individual, I would never under any circumstances endorse blaming other people or institutions for a personal failing. As individuals, we have to learn that we are responsible for ourselves.
As a collective though, we can easily see that groups of people don’t quite have the same level of opportunity. It’s mostly class based. I think a focus on making stronger public institutions in medicine and education can raise the floor of opportunity for everyone. I have to believe there is a way to do that without causing unforeseen problems like we did with student loans.
The bar for success in America isn't very high.
Graduate high school.
Get a job.
Don't have kids until you're in a committed relationship.
The overwhelming majority of the poor fail to do these things. These are personal decisions not some circumstance that is forced on them.
Democrats think Trump and the Russians stole the 2016 election to this day...
It's been proven definitively that the Russian collusion story was complete BS.
We still have no idea if the 2020 election was legitimate.
In places like Pennsylvania they mailed ballots to everyone on the voter rolls whether they requested a ballot or not. Whether the voter actually lived at the address you mailed it to or not. Whether the voter was alive or not. And whoever received the ballot can fill it out and mail it back without even having to sign it.
Anyone who thinks that scenario is on the up and up is a F'ing moron.
You are so stupid. Democrats do not think that Trump stole the election in 2016. We absolutely do know that the 2020 election was legitimate. You are a moron.
I think the problem is that "stole" is being used in two different senses.
Donald Trump won the 2016 election. He got all the votes he needed, in the states he needed, to win a majority of the electoral vote. No votes were artificially added to his tally, or subtracted from Hillary Clinton's. In that sense, the one I agree with, there was no steal in 2016. Now, did Donald Trump commit election-finance FELONIES, felonies for which his co-conspirator went to prison, to obtain some of those votes? Certainly. Did foreign actors (not just the Russians btw) illegally contribute in various ways to his candidacy, to get other votes? Certainly. In that second sense I suppose that one might say the 2016 election was "stolen," but no one whom I've encountered has ever suggested that President Trump did not actually receive the votes he was credited with.
Joseph Biden won the 2020 election. He got all the votes he needed, in the states he needed, to win a majority of the electoral vote. In contrast to the situation in 2016, when some people now say that the 2020 election was stolen, they're speaking in my first sense of the word: They're saying that Joseph Biden did not actuallyget those votes. That such proponents have lost scores of court cases on the point does not seem to deter them; the fact remains, however, that no evidence that can stand up in a court of law has been produced in support of massive election fraud. There was no steal in 2020.
-Republicans break out in huge lead in the "Battleground Districts".
Republicans 55% Democrats 34% Per the left-wing ABC/WaPo poll
This poll has a Dem bias and is RVs (Registered Voters) only which means the GOP lead is likely leading by a wider margin. At this point, any poll that's not doing LVs (Likely Voters) cannot be taken seriously.
Polls are seriously underestimating Republican chances to win this November. Most GOP voters don’t answer pollster. Most Independents voters won’t tell pollsters they are voting for Republicans. Most pollsters like to over sample Democrats so it will look like they are winning.
In that second sense I suppose that one might say the 2016 election was "stolen," but no one whom I've encountered has ever suggested that President Trump did not actually receive the votes he was credited with.
Then you haven't encountered Kamala Harris, or Jimmy Carter, or Hillary, or Joe Biden for that matter.
Democrats have a lengthy history of refusing to accept the results of elections they lost.--- Click below to subscribe now!http://www.youtube.com/c/GOP?sub_c...
-Republicans break out in huge lead in the "Battleground Districts".
Republicans 55% Democrats 34% Per the left-wing ABC/WaPo poll
This poll has a Dem bias and is RVs (Registered Voters) only which means the GOP lead is likely leading by a wider margin. At this point, any poll that's not doing LVs (Likely Voters) cannot be taken seriously.
The Red Earthquake is coming.
It's already started. Heck, Italy voted in a right-wing government.
Mastriano is going to be my next governor and Dr Oz will defeat the lazy slob who never worked & mooched off his daddy for his entire life. It will be a GOP sweep in PA.
Mastriano is going to be my next governor and Dr Oz will defeat the lazy slob who never worked & mooched off his daddy for his entire life. It will be a GOP sweep in PA.