Al Gore said the northern ice cap would be gone by 2014 during his acceptance speech for this Nobel prize in 2007. Even worse he wasn't making his own prediction he was referring to a scientific study. Imagine being a scientist that GD stupid...
Al Gore speaking about the northern sea ice in 2007:
"One study estimated that it could be completely gone during summer in less than 22 years. Another new study, to be presented by U.S. Navy researchers later this week, warns it could happen in as little as 7 years. Seven years from now."
Climate zealots didn't say "some things" that turned out not to be true. Pretty much EVERYTHING they said didn't turn out to be true.
It's not "one bad prediction" it's DOZENS of bad predictions.
Yes, the SEA ice. The ice in the sea surrounding the ice caps. The prediction was still wrong but he did not predict the whole ice cap would be gone. And I don't care if there are a hundred bad predictions if the science is still all pointing in the right (or wrong) direction.
+1
we're losing gigantic amounts of ice every year and these dunderheads are nitpicking the pace of ice loss. Fools.
Al Gore said the northern ice cap would be gone by 2014 during his acceptance speech for this Nobel prize in 2007. Even worse he wasn't making his own prediction he was referring to a scientific study. Imagine being a scientist that GD stupid...
Al Gore speaking about the northern sea ice in 2007:
"One study estimated that it could be completely gone during summer in less than 22 years. Another new study, to be presented by U.S. Navy researchers later this week, warns it could happen in as little as 7 years. Seven years from now."
Climate zealots didn't say "some things" that turned out not to be true. Pretty much EVERYTHING they said didn't turn out to be true.
It's not "one bad prediction" it's DOZENS of bad predictions.
Yes, the SEA ice. The ice in the sea surrounding the ice caps. The prediction was still wrong but he did not predict the whole ice cap would be gone. And I don't care if there are a hundred bad predictions if the science is still all pointing in the right (or wrong) direction.
Which science exactly do you think is pointing in the right direction?
There isn't a scientist alive that can tell you what percentage of the warming is anthropogenic. Not 1.
And the "sea ice" wasn't just not gone in 2014. There was MORE of it than there was in 2007 when the prediction was made. That's not just "wrong" it's hilariously wrong and complete incompetence.
Yes, the SEA ice. The ice in the sea surrounding the ice caps. The prediction was still wrong but he did not predict the whole ice cap would be gone. And I don't care if there are a hundred bad predictions if the science is still all pointing in the right (or wrong) direction.
+1
we're losing gigantic amounts of ice every year and these dunderheads are nitpicking the pace of ice loss. Fools.
here's a good tool to visualize the ice loss that happens every freaking year.
but these fools say 'ah hah a prediction was wrong so the experts are corrupt money hungry fraudsters! burn everything!'
Fun to play with this tool. Although immensely sad - what we are doing to the planet is the worst thing humanity has ever done, by far. We need governments to do order changes. Biden has been trying to do that, to his credit.
Yes, the SEA ice. The ice in the sea surrounding the ice caps. The prediction was still wrong but he did not predict the whole ice cap would be gone. And I don't care if there are a hundred bad predictions if the science is still all pointing in the right (or wrong) direction.
+1
we're losing gigantic amounts of ice every year and these dunderheads are nitpicking the pace of ice loss. Fools.
We've only had satellites monitoring the poles since the 1970s. The baseline the alarmists are using are literally from a decade when the "scientists" were worried about a new ice age.
Sea ice is declining because the baseline was the maximum extent of the last century...
we're losing gigantic amounts of ice every year and these dunderheads are nitpicking the pace of ice loss. Fools.
here's a good tool to visualize the ice loss that happens every freaking year.
but these fools say 'ah hah a prediction was wrong so the experts are corrupt money hungry fraudsters! burn everything!'
Fun to play with this tool. Although immensely sad - what we are doing to the planet is the worst thing humanity has ever done, by far. We need governments to do order changes. Biden has been trying to do that, to his credit.
here's a good tool to visualize the ice loss that happens every freaking year.
but these fools say 'ah hah a prediction was wrong so the experts are corrupt money hungry fraudsters! burn everything!'
Fun to play with this tool. Although immensely sad - what we are doing to the planet is the worst thing humanity has ever done, by far. We need governments to do order changes. Biden has been trying to do that, to his credit.
You have absolutely no idea what that chart means... what the hell are you pretending to be sad about??
You do realize that giant dip is summer right?
Any idea why the chart starts in 1979?
oh come on try harder.
you can use the option menu to see how the ice levels have been so much lower the last decades compared to earlier decades. And flip back and forth between arctic and antarctic.
Look you are an idiot and I'm not going to help you understand how to use a very simple website. Good luck.
You have absolutely no idea what that chart means... what the hell are you pretending to be sad about??
You do realize that giant dip is summer right?
Any idea why the chart starts in 1979?
oh come on try harder.
you can use the option menu to see how the ice levels have been so much lower the last decades compared to earlier decades. And flip back and forth between arctic and antarctic.
Look you are an idiot and I'm not going to help you understand how to use a very simple website. Good luck.
You're pretending to be worried about a topic you don't even remotely understand just because scientists who don't even remotely understand it are telling you to and I'm the idiot? LOL!!
You have absolutely no idea what that chart means... what the hell are you pretending to be sad about??
You do realize that giant dip is summer right?
Any idea why the chart starts in 1979?
oh come on try harder.
you can use the option menu to see how the ice levels have been so much lower the last decades compared to earlier decades. And flip back and forth between arctic and antarctic.
Look you are an idiot and I'm not going to help you understand how to use a very simple website. Good luck.
There was a record worldwide heatwave and drought in 1921 which starved millions of people. The Arctic was rapidly melting and glaciers were retreating everywhere. NASA has erased this history and now shows those years as bei...
NEW: House Republicans just rolled out their official "Commitment to America” plan for 2023 with an inspirational video chock full of scenes presented as exceptional imagery of America -- but that are actually stock footage from Russia and Ukraine.
here's a good tool to visualize the ice loss that happens every freaking year.
but these fools say 'ah hah a prediction was wrong so the experts are corrupt money hungry fraudsters! burn everything!'
Fun to play with this tool. Although immensely sad - what we are doing to the planet is the worst thing humanity has ever done, by far. We need governments to do order changes. Biden has been trying to do that, to his credit.
You have absolutely no idea what that chart means... what the hell are you pretending to be sad about??
You do realize that giant dip is summer right?
Any idea why the chart starts in 1979?
1979 is when the first polar satellite observations of Arctic sea ice were made by Nimbus-7.
Prior to that observational data is more sparse, hence has high uncertainty. There is sufficient observational and paleo data to conclude that the Arctic sea ice extents have been lower in recent decades than they have been in centuries at a minimum.
When the GOP retakes the House Kevin McCarthy promises the first action will be to repeal the bill providing for 87,000 new IRS agents. I think we can all agree this would be great.
Political nonsense.
GOP scare tactics.
"The 87,000 number appears to come from a 2021 Treasury Department estimate of the level of hiring needed to maintain IRS efficiency and keep up with retirements and other staff declines. However, the actual number of new IRS agents that will be hired because of the Inflation Reduction Act remains to be seen."
The United States DOES need to collect revenue due to it. This DOES require people to work for the IRS. Biden hasn't summoned a mob of IRS agents to come after Bubba for an extra $12.
He does not need to hire 87,000 agents to keep up with retirements as there are not that many agents currently. This is more than doubling the size of the agency. There are not enough accountants unemployed to even fill that demand. Not to mention the inefficiency of trying to train and supervise that many green agents.
You have absolutely no idea what that chart means... what the hell are you pretending to be sad about??
You do realize that giant dip is summer right?
Any idea why the chart starts in 1979?
1979 is when the first polar satellite observations of Arctic sea ice were made by Nimbus-7.
Prior to that observational data is more sparse, hence has high uncertainty. There is sufficient observational and paleo data to conclude that the Arctic sea ice extents have been lower in recent decades than they have been in centuries at a minimum.
"The 87,000 number appears to come from a 2021 Treasury Department estimate of the level of hiring needed to maintain IRS efficiency and keep up with retirements and other staff declines. However, the actual number of new IRS agents that will be hired because of the Inflation Reduction Act remains to be seen."
The United States DOES need to collect revenue due to it. This DOES require people to work for the IRS. Biden hasn't summoned a mob of IRS agents to come after Bubba for an extra $12.
He does not need to hire 87,000 agents to keep up with retirements as there are not that many agents currently. This is more than doubling the size of the agency. There are not enough accountants unemployed to even fill that demand. Not to mention the inefficiency of trying to train and supervise that many green agents.
Umm, aren't those hires supposed to be over the course of something like ten years? Yeah, that's right:
"The Inflation Reduction Act . . . includes roughly $78 billion for the IRS to be phased in over 10 years. A Treasury Department report from May 2021 estimated that such an investment would enable the agency to hire roughly 87,000 employees by 2031. But most of those hires would not be Internal Revenue agents, and wouldn’t be new positions.
"According to a Treasury Department official, the funds would cover a wide range of positions including IT technicians and taxpayer services support staff, as well as experienced auditors who would be largely tasked with cracking down on corporate and high-income tax evaders."
He does not need to hire 87,000 agents to keep up with retirements as there are not that many agents currently. This is more than doubling the size of the agency. There are not enough accountants unemployed to even fill that demand. Not to mention the inefficiency of trying to train and supervise that many green agents.
Umm, aren't those hires supposed to be over the course of something like ten years? Yeah, that's right:
"The Inflation Reduction Act . . . includes roughly $78 billion for the IRS to be phased in over 10 years. A Treasury Department report from May 2021 estimated that such an investment would enable the agency to hire roughly 87,000 employees by 2031. But most of those hires would not be Internal Revenue agents, and wouldn’t be new positions.
"According to a Treasury Department official, the funds would cover a wide range of positions including IT technicians and taxpayer services support staff, as well as experienced auditors who would be largely tasked with cracking down on corporate and high-income tax evaders."
John Kerry, U.S. special presidential climate envoy, said Thursday that the Inflation Reduction Act does not seem to have much to do with infation but is still "amazing."
"Kerry called the bill an "amazing piece of legislation" for what it does for green energy and combating climate change."
This pork laden monstrosity will literally do the opposite of what it claims to be for. Amazingly, printing money and flushing it down the toilet on unnecessary garbage does not reduce inflation.
The federal government drastically overestimates income inequality in the United States by failing to account for certain welfare programs and income taxes on the wealthiest earners, according to a study released on Tuesday b...
Umm, aren't those hires supposed to be over the course of something like ten years? Yeah, that's right:
"The Inflation Reduction Act . . . includes roughly $78 billion for the IRS to be phased in over 10 years. A Treasury Department report from May 2021 estimated that such an investment would enable the agency to hire roughly 87,000 employees by 2031. But most of those hires would not be Internal Revenue agents, and wouldn’t be new positions.
"According to a Treasury Department official, the funds would cover a wide range of positions including IT technicians and taxpayer services support staff, as well as experienced auditors who would be largely tasked with cracking down on corporate and high-income tax evaders."
"Kerry called the bill an "amazing piece of legislation" for what it does for green energy and combating climate change."
This pork laden monstrosity will literally do the opposite of what it claims to be for. Amazingly, printing money and flushing it down the toilet on unnecessary garbage does not reduce inflation.
just keep defending those rich guys like trump who need a weak IRS and have bought the GOP to get it.
they love you man, they love you for what you are doing for them.
they convicted another seditionist today. Apparently the DOJ has a perfect record in court convicting these haters.
&&&
Doug Jensen GUILTY on all counts. His atty told reporters "we're respectful of the jury verdict" but "it's a sad case." "In my personal opinion, I think Mr. Jensen had a lot of issues, had a lot of problems back when all this occurred," Chris Davis said.
You have absolutely no idea what that chart means... what the hell are you pretending to be sad about??
You do realize that giant dip is summer right?
Any idea why the chart starts in 1979?
1979 is when the first polar satellite observations of Arctic sea ice were made by Nimbus-7.
Prior to that observational data is more sparse, hence has high uncertainty. There is sufficient observational and paleo data to conclude that the Arctic sea ice extents have been lower in recent decades than they have been in centuries at a minimum.
I am sure you would agree that looking at ice extents in the last 40-some-odd years and declaring which way the ice extents are going when the Earth is 4.6 BILLION years is FLAT OUT NUTS?!!!!
