No -- but he would be fired for telling a lineman to LOSE weight.
No offense, Hoss ... but comparing offensive linemen -- and asking them to gain weight is not remotely similar to telling women who are already skinny to lose more weight. A correct analogy would be to tell an offensive lineman that he is too big to lose weight -- which happens everyday at every decent school. You can definitely be too big and too fat to be a great OL player. If you look at most pro football players now-a-days -- it isn't really even about weight. It is about their frame. Football coaches want long levers (arms) and huge frames that they can rebuild in a manner that helps their program be successful.
You can do this in track/cross as well -- but you have to go into it honestly and tell the truth upfront. And you need to make sure that you have plenty of sports shrinks ready for when female runners don't understand that going LOWER than their ideal weight is not an option.
There is enough science out there now-a-days that speaks to the fact that everyone has an ideal weight -- even as a long distance runner. You just need to be ready to help understand and hold the line with females when they think that they should be under their ideal weight. Pull them. Put their health first. Let them know what to expect when they are being recruited -- and let them know up front that the program will find the ideal body composition for athletes in the program -- and that they will be expected to stick to that weight or they will be pulled. Communicate, communicate, communicate ... it doesn't have to be hard.
Dealing with male/female athletes is different. One person can handle it --- but it will take time and effort to ensure to manage something like that. Most importantly, it will take honesty -- and a very strong personality to help the females understand that their health comes before anything else.
I have already turned this job down -- the administration wants less of a $hitshow with Coach Prime-and-Wine making a spectacle of himself everyday. They want someone who isn't going to make waves for an extended period of time -- which to me feels like they are not overly interested in getting the program back to the next level. With NIL money out there -- and boy is there a lot when it comes to CU -- it felt a ton more like getting along to get along instead of a progressive thought process that is interested in building/rebuilding a program. Which also could end up being a younger person who is well thought of and isn't overly concerned about proper compensation.
The other thing -- it is time that track/distance/xc coaches move away from the "lets be friends with the coach" routine. It makes it a ton easier for kids to fall through the cracks -- and to hide the eating disorders. You can develop relationships with athletes --- and have solid discussions and give and take -- without acting like you are going to be drinking buddies as soon as you graduate.
The sport is changing massively -- and all the former high level runners who think they are coaches usually have no understanding of what it takes to be a "real" coach. They understand how to be buddies and how to run with their coach -- instead of being coached. These great former runners who are now coaching usually have no understanding of how to deal with anyone other than exceptionally talented athletes. That group is so small to begin with -- and you are leaving the majority of the rest of the program off to the side ... trying to figure out what to do on their own -- when they obviously are not there yet. CU needs a coach who is more worried about coaching everyone on the roster -- than the 2-3 elite level athletes. Until that focus comes back -- eating disorders will continue -- because it is the only sure fire way to help an above average female runner make it to the next step -- because your famous elite runner/coaches can't relate to the average, middle of the road student athlete.