If the media treated Biden the way they treated Trump Biden would have been impeached 15 times by now.
I'm a libertarian I don't have any representation.
If you're asking me about the Republicans they are quite obviously better than the Democrats.
Biden would have been impeached 15 times by now? Since Jan. 2021? For what, pray tell?
The media CAN'T treat Biden the way it treated Trump, because Biden isn't corrupt. Biden isn't saying we should nuke hurricanes. Biden isn't boning a porn star and paying her off to keep quiet. Biden isn't suggesting we inject disinfectants into our bodies. Biden isn't lying like a firehose every single day about things important and not.
Get ahold of yourself. Splash some cold water on your face. Look in the mirror and ask, "WTF is wrong with me?" Go get some therapy.
I might have to ban some of you. I've kind of already stopped commenting to Gary, because he's batsh!t crazy to believe that the election was stolen, and the "groomer" comments are also batsh!t crazy, and I'm not really interested in conversing with batsh!t crazy.
Now, this comment from you that Biden should have been impeached 15 times by now is also batsh!t crazy. I may give you the opportunity to retract that absolute nonsense, but if not, it may be time for me to stop responding to you...I mean, seriously, WTF is going on in that dome of yours? I hope the nurse brings you your favorite pudding today.
Flagpole telling another poster here to "go get some therapy." Doesn't get any better than this.
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) questioned nominee for assistant health secretary Rachel Levine about her position on gender-affirming care for minors. Read more: htt...
The MISTAKE that Oberlin recognizes is that the university should not have gotten involved. Oberlin wrote a public apology to the Gibson family and said it should have squashed the backlash against the bakery. The University disagrees with the monetary judgement but has accepted responsibility for being wrong.
You are a fool.
Where is this apology you say exists?
The only thing online seems to be articles about the lack of apology.
I will grant you that they don't actually say the word "apologize" in the letter which in my opinion they should done. Perhaps this was on advice of counsel, HOWEVER, they DID take responsibility for their actions, and YOUR conservative Washington Times labels it as an apology.
I will pull out the pertinent, and I have bolded the most pertinent:
“Oberlin’s prior president, a good man, testified at trial that labeling one a racist is among the worst accusations one can make against someone.
“Yet, Oberlin College students recklessly led a boycott of Gibson’s based largely on a false charge that the Gibson family were racists.
“That charge and the boycott that it led to betrayed Oberlin’s heritage.
“We regret that the Gibson family was smeared in this way and that its business was harmed by a boycott supported by a big, ugly, libelous lie.
“We regret that we did not speak out and renounce this ugly smear early or at least when the facts became known long ago.
“We regret that we lent support to these reckless students even long after the facts became known.
“We will work to heal the deep wounds that our conduct caused and/or abetted.”
I will grant you that they don't actually say the word "apologize" in the letter which in my opinion they should done. Perhaps this was on advice of counsel, HOWEVER, they DID take responsibility for their actions, and YOUR conservative Washington Times labels it as an apology.
I will pull out the pertinent, and I have bolded the most pertinent:
“Oberlin’s prior president, a good man, testified at trial that labeling one a racist is among the worst accusations one can make against someone.
“Yet, Oberlin College students recklessly led a boycott of Gibson’s based largely on a false charge that the Gibson family were racists.
“That charge and the boycott that it led to betrayed Oberlin’s heritage.
“We regret that the Gibson family was smeared in this way and that its business was harmed by a boycott supported by a big, ugly, libelous lie.
“We regret that we did not speak out and renounce this ugly smear early or at least when the facts became known long ago.
“We regret that we lent support to these reckless students even long after the facts became known.
“We will work to heal the deep wounds that our conduct caused and/or abetted.”
You just linked an op-ed written by an Oberlin alum describing the apology he wished his school had written. he wrote this on 9/7/2022 because the school still hasn't apologized.
In one post you've proven you're not only a liar but a GD moron.
I will grant you that they don't actually say the word "apologize" in the letter which in my opinion they should done. Perhaps this was on advice of counsel, HOWEVER, they DID take responsibility for their actions, and YOUR conservative Washington Times labels it as an apology.
I will pull out the pertinent, and I have bolded the most pertinent:
“Oberlin’s prior president, a good man, testified at trial that labeling one a racist is among the worst accusations one can make against someone.
“Yet, Oberlin College students recklessly led a boycott of Gibson’s based largely on a false charge that the Gibson family were racists.
“That charge and the boycott that it led to betrayed Oberlin’s heritage.
“We regret that the Gibson family was smeared in this way and that its business was harmed by a boycott supported by a big, ugly, libelous lie.
“We regret that we did not speak out and renounce this ugly smear early or at least when the facts became known long ago.
“We regret that we lent support to these reckless students even long after the facts became known.
“We will work to heal the deep wounds that our conduct caused and/or abetted.”
You just linked an op-ed written by an Oberlin alum describing the apology he wished his school had written. he wrote this on 9/7/2022 because the school still hasn't apologized.
In one post you've proven you're not only a liar but a GD moron.
I will grant you that they don't actually say the word "apologize" in the letter which in my opinion they should done. Perhaps this was on advice of counsel, HOWEVER, they DID take responsibility for their actions, and YOUR conservative Washington Times labels it as an apology.
I will pull out the pertinent, and I have bolded the most pertinent:
“Oberlin’s prior president, a good man, testified at trial that labeling one a racist is among the worst accusations one can make against someone.
“Yet, Oberlin College students recklessly led a boycott of Gibson’s based largely on a false charge that the Gibson family were racists.
“That charge and the boycott that it led to betrayed Oberlin’s heritage.
“We regret that the Gibson family was smeared in this way and that its business was harmed by a boycott supported by a big, ugly, libelous lie.
“We regret that we did not speak out and renounce this ugly smear early or at least when the facts became known long ago.
“We regret that we lent support to these reckless students even long after the facts became known.
“We will work to heal the deep wounds that our conduct caused and/or abetted.”
You just linked an op-ed written by an Oberlin alum describing the apology he wished his school had written. he wrote this on 9/7/2022 because the school still hasn't apologized.
In one post you've proven you're not only a liar but a GD moron.
Well done.
He has spent the last 10 years proving those 2 things.
Prominent pollster Nate Silver explained that President Biden's "transactional" student loan handout directly benefits Democratic voters over other Americans.
Can you explain how the Dems had a good summer though?
per 538:
likelihood of a D senate
june 1: 40%
Sept 9: 69%
Likelihood of a D house
June 1: 14%
Sept 9: 26%
Joe Biden approval highest since roughly January 2022.
Plus a whole mess of legislative triumphs.
k?
Oh, it goes WELL beyond that.
1) Trump and Trump associates in increasingly hotter and hotter water.
2) SERIOUS legislative victories for Democrats including gun control, NATO expansion, high-tech chip manufacturing, infrastructure funding, help for veterans, prescription drug price controls, and environmental measures. Also push back on the Roe v. Wade nonsense.
This summer has been perhaps the most consequential summer for any US political party in my lifetime. Now, Trumpers might not LIKE those legislative wins for Democrats, but they are just that...legislative WINS.
At a MINIMUM, for a child under the age of 18, it should require parental approval (and I would call that bad parenting), and ideally, this should not be allowed to be done by doctors until the person is 18 or older.
One thing to have a person under age 18 identify as a different gender, but surgery is permanent. No permanent decisions like that should be allowed to be made by anyone under age 18.