Sure I did. The difference is I can understand what I read and you can only understand things if they confirm the opinion you had before you started reading.
"The Department of Justice has the power to file a denaturalization lawsuit against a naturalized citizen under two circumstances: first, if they obtained their citizenship illegally — i.e., they didn’t actually meet the legal requirements of citizenship — or, second, if they lied about or concealed something during the citizenship process that was relevant to their case."
You can't get a job at Wendy's if you lie on your application. Why exactly do you think US citizenship should have lower standards?
"But toward the end of the Obama administration, and going into the Trump administration, the government started filing denaturalization suits against people who’d committed other crimes that hadn’t been included on their naturalization applications."
You blame Trump for this yet the tactic started under Obama. Of course, you didn't even read the article.
Read this next part slow and then read it again:
"In November 2017, the government went a step further: It sued to denaturalize five men who had each been convicted of sexual crimes against children after they had been naturalized — because those convictions had included criminal activity stretching back before their naturalizations."
Thee human filth that wrote the article you didn't read are actually upset that CHILD RAPISTS are being persecuted for the innocent mistake of REPEATEDLY F*CKING CHILDREN before and after they were naturalized.
No decent human being would advocate for child rapists. Yet here you are.