"Pandemic of the unvaccinated" CONFIRMED

The Unkle wrote:

Would you get on a plane with a vaccinated pilot?

He could be taken out by blood clots at any time

Dang. What’s this about?

These mofos (vaccinators) are way over the top. Flat out don’t care who dies as long as they somehow feel a little safer. Odd emotional connection

The flailing desperation continues... Another monday of middle aged white guys falling over themselves to push the overwhelming weight of science and data away. "OH HEREZ SOME CLICKBAIT I FOUND ON FACEBOOK THAT PROVES MY SHALLOW OPINION IS CERTAINLY CORRECT!!!!"

NaturalNews? Gateway Pundit? Russian/commie memes?

Truly the pandemic of the unvaccinated: confirmed.

Disco Gary the Biggest Loser wrote:

Truly the pandemic of the unvaccinated: confirmed.

There are plenty of more valid critiques of the entire COVID-vaccine-etc process but these denier-fearmongers ALWAYS commit to the most extreme (e.g. deaths are faked, vaccine doesn't work at all, china made the virus as a bioweapon, I could go on).

It shows that they aren't after answers, just after pushing the biggest conspiracy they can because that's how their brain operates.

Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FBX7Io_XEAA9YOY?format=jpg&name=900x900

I've often wondered why you post things like this. Do you truly believe that the majority of vaccinated Americans stay at home all day, hanging on Fauci's every word? Have you considered that people got vaccinated so that they DON'T have to stay at home if they want to reduce the chance of spreading a deadly virus?

It's the Fall. There are plenty of straw men out in the pumpkin patch and we don't need any more.

Harambe wrote:

Disco Gary the Biggest Loser wrote:

I am Harambe/2600 bro: confirmed.

I have to reply to myself now because I am sad people are not paying more attention to me and my fearmongering. :'( boohoo

Yup.

CountChocula wrote:

I've often wondered why you post things like this. Do you truly believe that the majority of vaccinated Americans stay at home all day, hanging on Fauci's every word? Have you considered that people got vaccinated so that they DON'T have to stay at home if they want to reduce the chance of spreading a deadly virus.

Nope. Can't use common sense with these folks around. It will go right over their heads. You and I understand. That clown won't.

Harambe wrote:

these denier-fearmongers ALWAYS commit to the most extreme

Hmmm, what portion of the crowd involved in Jan.6 are also anti-vaxxers?

Good to see that Harambe is still sticking to the official Biden statements, "If you're vaccinated, you're not going to be hospitalized, you're not going to be in the ICU unit and you're not going to die." and "including the Delta virus, which is much, much more transmissible and more deadly in terms of non un-vaccinated people. The, the, the various shots that people are getting now cover that. They're, they're okay. You're not gonna, you're not gonna get COVID if you have these vaccinations":

https://www.cnn.com/2021/07/22/politics/fact-check-biden-cnn-town-hall-july/index.html

So, as we look to the near future and the likely prospect that deaths since the election was declared for Biden on January 6th (and Trump became a lame duck) will soon surpass those under a year of COVID under Trump (who only had approved vaccines to work with for a brief period of time), are we going to hold Biden to the same standard of accountability. During the debates he said Trump did nothing and criticized how 750-1,000 people a day were dying (the daily average for the past week has been 1,454). So would you say Biden is doing a good job with COVID?

CountChocula wrote:

Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FBX7Io_XEAA9YOY?format=jpg&name=900x900

I've often wondered why you post things like this. Do you truly believe that the majority of vaccinated Americans stay at home all day, hanging on Fauci's every word? Have you considered that people got vaccinated so that they DON'T have to stay at home if they want to reduce the chance of spreading a deadly virus?

It's the Fall. There are plenty of straw men out in the pumpkin patch and we don't need any more.

LOLz, vaxx cultist.

The mandates that refuse to recognize the science of natural immunity are truly dangerous. One of my wife's employees husbands who suffered a stroke after having a forced vax by his employer (the state) after he had already tested positive for COVID prior to that has been mandated to get a booster vaccination. He's scared 5hitle$$ and doesn't know what to do. I'd probably refuse the shot and lawyer up if I were him, but I am financially secure. This couple is not great with their money and he needs the income. It would be tough to be forced to decide between the prospect of another stroke (or worse) and one's livelihood because of a mandate that completely stands in the way of scientific evidence.

Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:

LOLz, vaxx cultist.

The current iteration of DG is just a try-hard troll, hoping to trigger his supposed enemy/target/victims. Whatever he needs to compensate for personal short coming, mental challenges or whatever is causing him hurt and pain. The cure is to target, bait and bring anger/pain to "the other."

Sad to see this play out on a daily basis here and sad that LRC provides a "safe space" for someone like this to cast their lines.

The Clown Show wrote:

Harambe wrote:

these denier-fearmongers ALWAYS commit to the most extreme

Hmmm, what portion of the crowd involved in Jan.6 are also anti-vaxxers?

95+% for sure. The same people get suckered into the same types of propaganda.

Disco Gary the Biggest Loser wrote:

Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:

LOLz, vaxx cultist.

The current iteration of DG is just a try-hard troll, hoping to trigger his supposed enemy/target/victims. Whatever he needs to compensate for personal short coming, mental challenges or whatever is causing him hurt and pain. The cure is to target, bait and bring anger/pain to "the other."

Sad to see this play out on a daily basis here and sad that LRC provides a "safe space" for someone like this to cast their lines.

You don't "believe in science." You make observations, evaluate data, and make decisions accordingly. There is never a "believe science." Belief is nothing more than unquestioned dogma. You got it all wrong, vaxx cultist.

Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:

You don't "believe in science." You make observations, evaluate data, and make decisions accordingly. There is never a "believe science." Belief is nothing more than unquestioned dogma. You got it all wrong, vaxx cultist.

Well, glad to hear you agree with 'pandemic of the unvaccinated' then, considering, the data shows that vaccines are -very- protective against severe illness.

for example:

joedirtball wrote:

The mandates that refuse to recognize the science of natural immunity are truly dangerous. One of my wife's employees husbands who suffered a stroke after having a forced vax by his employer (the state) after he had already tested positive for COVID prior to that has been mandated to get a booster vaccination. He's scared 5hitle$$ and doesn't know what to do. I'd probably refuse the shot and lawyer up if I were him, but I am financially secure. This couple is not great with their money and he needs the income. It would be tough to be forced to decide between the prospect of another stroke (or worse) and one's livelihood because of a mandate that completely stands in the way of scientific evidence.

All these sheep vaxx cultists follow the pseudoscience column:

Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:

You don't "believe in science." You make observations, evaluate data, and make decisions accordingly. There is never a "believe science." Belief is nothing more than unquestioned dogma. You got it all wrong, vaxx cultist.

[I know you're just trolling hard for a reaction, but:]

Your schtick is like like watching a kid on playground get caught cheating at a game, called out for it, shunned for his greed and stupidity, but who then doubles down to argue why he's "not wrong" and refuses to concede. Pure pride mixed with shallow self confidence and integrity. Sad and reflective of so many problems - mental, social, political, societal - in our country and world today.

Harambe wrote:

The Clown Show wrote:

Hmmm, what portion of the crowd involved in Jan.6 are also anti-vaxxers?

95+% for sure. The same people get suckered into the same types of propaganda.

And there we go, more bigotry from Harambe. He is such a valiant person.

Lead Foil Hat XVI wrote:

Harambe wrote:

95+% for sure. The same people get suckered into the same types of propaganda.

And there we go, more bigotry from Harambe. He is such a valiant person.

Acknowledging that people susceptible to the 'election fraud' propaganda are also susceptible to anti-vaxx talking points is not bigotry.

Haha wow. I literally wrote this in my other post about how someone within 10 posts would do exactly what you just did. Stupid people masquerading as smart people are so comically easy to spot and predict.

" In fact, watch someone not even read my post correctly and do this to me within the next 10 or so posts - someone will, guaranteed."

So okay, you did that. I'm laughing at how easy that was.

First of all I'm not here to argue that more unvaccinated people get sick than vaccinated. Is that your "expert" take on all of this? Yeah no kidding Captain Obvious. That's like saying "there is a pandemic of chicken pox amongst non-vaccinated kids vs vaccinated kids". If that is the entire premise of your position, to point out that with any virus that non-vaccinated people get more sick than vaccinated this you truly are a self-righteous d$ckhead of the highest possible order.

So on to my comment. I don't need to provide more than one piece of evidence about hospitals manipulating numbers. The statement was "there is ZERO evidence". So one example proves that statement incorrect. Game over. Doesn't matter if there are 1 million cases of number manipulation or just one - the statement "zero evidence" isn't factual. So if you are standing up here claiming to be a bastion of facts then you need to acknowledge this or you are just a hypocritical f--kwit (which I know you are anyway).

Finally, and this is how I know you aren't intelligent because this is comically stupid, you are an active heart attack sufferer when you are having a heart attack. When you are recovering you are not an active heart attack sufferer. You are a recovering heart attack sufferer. If the US tracked heart attacks on a daily basis (they probably do I don't know) they don't "carry" the heart attack you had over into the next days/weeks just because you are in the hospital/at home recovering from it. That's beyond ridiculous. You have covid or you don't. When you have covid you are an "active" covid carrier/sufferer/patient. When you don't, you aren't an "active" carrier/sufferer/patient anymore.

Recovering doesn't equal active. If you think they are the same I suggest you consult a f-ing dictionary and educate yourself.

Argument is over. Heavy loss my friend, HEAVY loss.