oh dear god this is become a useless thread, debating the performance risks or benefits for 20-29 year olds -- kids really -- from a vaccine. the general idea was societal survival of a pandemic. the primary value of the vaccine is the survival of those over 40 who pose mortality risks. the secondary value of the vaccine for those younger is herd immunity for the primary mortality risks. people with no epidemiological chops continue to beef about public health ideas designed less on the survival of that youthful age group and more on them not getting it and doing fine, while passing it on to someone older that they kill. this is true of the school debate. this is true of the vaccine debate. and so on. the kids are taking the vaccine and doing all the other stuff so schools are less of a vector and fewer chubby 50 year old school teachers or parents die. but of course in an over-individualized society like the US, we have to discuss crap in terms of the politics of personal choice. and people have to slap together intellectual excuses for being contrarian, even when the medicine clearly worked.
i mean, do you see covid rampant anymore? exactly. thanks. if you understand coronaviruses, they have short short short immunity times. we could in theory have just gotten sick over and over and over.
2600. Please please please let me donate to a charity in your name! Just a quick easy response with the proof of your very factual statement!
The bottom line is, just like his alter-ego, he lied. If they are not credible on the very small things, then they are not credible on anything. A very disingenuous fellow.
Lying, hyperbole and straw men. All in a day in the life of Harambro. 😂
oh dear god this is become a useless thread, debating the performance risks or benefits for 20-29 year olds -- kids really -- from a vaccine. the general idea was societal survival of a pandemic. the primary value of the vaccine is the survival of those over 40 who pose mortality risks. the secondary value of the vaccine for those younger is herd immunity for the primary mortality risks. people with no epidemiological chops continue to beef about public health ideas designed less on the survival of that youthful age group and more on them not getting it and doing fine, while passing it on to someone older that they kill. this is true of the school debate. this is true of the vaccine debate. and so on. the kids are taking the vaccine and doing all the other stuff so schools are less of a vector and fewer chubby 50 year old school teachers or parents die. but of course in an over-individualized society like the US, we have to discuss crap in terms of the politics of personal choice. and people have to slap together intellectual excuses for being contrarian, even when the medicine clearly worked.
i mean, do you see covid rampant anymore? exactly. thanks. if you understand coronaviruses, they have short short short immunity times. we could in theory have just gotten sick over and over and over.
The pandemic ended thanks to Omicron (something the vaccines failed to do). 👍
2600. Please please please let me donate to a charity in your name! Just a quick easy response with the proof of your very factual statement!
The bottom line is, just like his alter-ego, he lied. If they are not credible on the very small things, then they are not credible on anything. A very disingenuous fellow.
I’ve never lied. you make elementary errors when discussing biology, does that mean that we shouldn’t trust you when you expound treatment strategies and such? Probably.
i'm going to remind people this "covid lost its potency" post was made in may 2020 and we can just giggle at the accuracy of that. how many million people died after that. complete nonsense.
Good point. COVID denier antivaxxers were just as dumb then as now.
The bottom line is, just like his alter-ego, he lied. If they are not credible on the very small things, then they are not credible on anything. A very disingenuous fellow.
I’ve never lied. you make elementary errors when discussing biology, does that mean that we shouldn’t trust you when you expound treatment strategies and such? Probably.
You have been called out for lying and stating outrageous opinions as facts. Then you say teehee, it’s just an anonymous message board. You still have no credibility.
I’ve never lied. you make elementary errors when discussing biology, does that mean that we shouldn’t trust you when you expound treatment strategies and such? Probably.
You have been called out for lying and stating outrageous opinions as facts. Then you say teehee, it’s just an anonymous message board. You still have no credibility.
Incorrect. You’ve never once proven me wrong. You’re enraged because I make elegant points that shatter your juvenile worldview. That’s a problem between you and your therapist.
This is just getting disappointing now. Thats such a low level effort. You truly are a letdown these days
Almost as embarrassing as raging for a couple days because someone talked about dunes runner 😃
No one is raging. Someone is just consistently calling you out for your lies. You bring this stuff up, just like tennis, then retreat to saying something something seethe!!! Again you brought it up. You got called out for being a liar. Then say why are we even talking about this. No rage. Calm pointed takedown of your stupid false talking points.
Almost as embarrassing as raging for a couple days because someone talked about dunes runner 😃
No one is raging. Someone is just consistently calling you out for your lies. You bring this stuff up, just like tennis, then retreat to saying something something seethe!!! Again you brought it up. You got called out for being a liar. Then say why are we even talking about this. No rage. Calm pointed takedown of your stupid false talking points.
Bro, I diagnosed Chokervic with long covid and he hasn’t won’t a tourney since. There was no lying there. I have not been wrong.
You just really, really don’t like that I’m right.
This post was edited 22 seconds after it was posted.
You have been called out for lying and stating outrageous opinions as facts. Then you say teehee, it’s just an anonymous message board. You still have no credibility.
Incorrect. You’ve never once proven me wrong. You’re enraged because I make elegant points that shatter your juvenile worldview. That’s a problem between you and your therapist.
You’ve literally gone from dunes is confirmed dead. Dunes is still dead but someone took over the account. The gravestone from 2600 for Dunes was a joke. Dunes is metaphorically dead because they don’t talk to me. And finally you’re now at well, we can never know. You sir are a goddamn moron.
Incorrect. You’ve never once proven me wrong. You’re enraged because I make elegant points that shatter your juvenile worldview. That’s a problem between you and your therapist.
You’ve literally gone from dunes is confirmed dead. Dunes is still dead but someone took over the account. The gravestone from 2600 for Dunes was a joke. Dunes is metaphorically dead because they don’t talk to me. And finally you’re now at well, we can never know. You sir are a goddamn moron.
Confirmed? Never said that. I said it was most likely a death due to the timing and the irony (I believe in god). How could it be confirmed? So no, not a lie. You seem to have the abstract thinking ability of an Australopithecus, but I can continue to help you understand this.
You’ve literally gone from dunes is confirmed dead. Dunes is still dead but someone took over the account. The gravestone from 2600 for Dunes was a joke. Dunes is metaphorically dead because they don’t talk to me. And finally you’re now at well, we can never know. You sir are a goddamn moron.
Confirmed? Never said that. I said it was most likely a death due to the timing and the irony (I believe in god). How could it be confirmed? So no, not a lie. You seem to have the abstract thinking ability of an Australopithecus, but I can continue to help you understand this.
Keep walking it back. You’ve been doing it for years. You make a ridiculous non sequitur. Try to justify it with overly wordy pseudo intellectualism, and then back track later. With that said, you can be the oldest modern tennis player to make the Wimbledon final 25 days after surgery, but you can’t win it? I’m just trying to finish off my bingo card over here for you foolish takes.