With First Lady Jill Biden announcing she’s contracted COVID, you would think that her husband Joe Biden would be extra careful not to risk spreading the vir...
How long should the feds have let Trump keep stolen top secret documents insecurely in his basement?
The DOJ waited over a year, out of respect for the ex-prez.
What's your view on how long the DOJ should have waited? 3 years? 4? Maybe 7 or 8? Give me a round estimate. I'm curious.
If this were an urgent issue, they should have (and probably would have) done the raid ASAP. If not, never.
No, they waited. They waited. And waited. And asked nicely. Because trump was a president. They were showing respect.
fact is, if anyone else had top secret information in his basement, the FBI would have done the raid ASAP as you say.
But they treated trump with kid gloves, waiting and hoping he would come around.
That's the irony I'm getting at. The trumpers say the FBI is corrupt and biased against Trump...but the FBI ACTUALLY gave him all the breaks and deference in the world.
The FURTHER irony is that of course trump only saw the FBI's niceness as weakness and tried to take advantage of it by handing over only some stuff. Now trump's misread of the FBI could get him jail or at least a lot of legal bills.
Perhaps it was an "accepted norm" for you - and maybe it was even true - but it's not an assumption I'm willing to make without evidence.
You are saying that Biden is meddling in DOJ investigations. But you have no evidence.
In America, the burden of proof is on the accuser. Either state your evidence or move to Russia.
How many times did you convict Trump with no evidence?1?? Let's see .... Russian conspiracy, impeachment 1 impeachment 2, Jan. 6, mar -a-lago - Where is YOUR evidence?? If no evidence - YOU move to Russia!!!
You are saying that Biden is meddling in DOJ investigations. But you have no evidence.
In America, the burden of proof is on the accuser. Either state your evidence or move to Russia.
How many times did you convict Trump with no evidence?1?? Let's see .... Russian conspiracy, impeachment 1 impeachment 2, Jan. 6, mar -a-lago - Where is YOUR evidence?? If no evidence - YOU move to Russia!!!
You have reported posts to the mods in the past, Karenpole.
A handful of times EVER since I started posting here in 2001, and ONLY when someone was threatening violence. As long as you keep violence off the table, say what you want. I wear big boy pants.
Big boy pants are not worn by little bald dudes who are 5'2". Those "big boy" pants you speak of are maybe the real "big boy" that Mrs. Flagpole found.
How many times did you convict Trump with no evidence?1?? Let's see .... Russian conspiracy, impeachment 1 impeachment 2, Jan. 6, mar -a-lago - Where is YOUR evidence?? If no evidence - YOU move to Russia!!!
57 senators voted to remove the president.
And he was acquitted (i.e., cleared of all charges) by the same Senate. TWICE!
The fact that he can fire him proves he's not independent. Sorry this simple concept alludes you. While we're at it, by your logic, what evidence do you have that Bill Barr wasn't "independent"?
Also, the word is "eludes", you dumb@ss. At least learn that, you f*cking moron.
Oh yeah. Sorry this simple concept eludes you. Funny how you were able to make this correction, but not to offer any counterargument (probably because one doesn't exist).
Why are so angry and triggered lately? Again, this not the Flagpole that we all know. Perhaps it's the inevitability of the GOP regaining control of both Houses of Congress and either Trump or DeSantis running the show in 2025.
Why are so angry and triggered lately? Again, this not the Flagpole that we all know. Perhaps it's the inevitability of the GOP regaining control of both Houses of Congress and either Trump or DeSantis running the show in 2025.
Apparently he's now retired and doesn't have much else going on? Maybe frustrated Mueller hasn't arrived yet... I wonder how long he'll keep waiting for him.
No, you are 100% incorrect. Before Trump, it was, at a minimum, an accepted norm that they'd be maximally independent.
Perhaps it was an "accepted norm" for you - and maybe it was even true - but it's not an assumption I'm willing to make without evidence.
Again, you had all of the evidence in the world that Trump was abusing it, and I have little doubt that it concerned you little, or not at all.
Additionally, I have little doubt that you didn't insist on previous R presidents proving their non-interference purity (and I'm no lawyer, but I don't think that we normally "prove" innocence!). And only slightly less likely, I'll bet that you also didn't worry about it being too much of a problem with previous D presidents. Again, because it was, in fact, a norm that reasonably adult presidents largely, if not completely, followed for generations.
But Trump and the other morans have COMPLETELY talked so many of you into being COMPLETELY and transparently and shamelessly inconsistent. Really a shame you're not embarrassed by that, and so many other things Trumpian.
You are saying that Biden is meddling in DOJ investigations. But you have no evidence.
In America, the burden of proof is on the accuser. Either state your evidence or move to Russia.
How many times did you convict Trump with no evidence?1?? Let's see .... Russian conspiracy, impeachment 1 impeachment 2, Jan. 6, mar -a-lago - Where is YOUR evidence?? If no evidence - YOU move to Russia!!!
There was plenty of evidence presented to the house and the senate.
But you have no evidence that Biden meddled in DOJ investigations. Zero.
You are saying that Biden is meddling in DOJ investigations. But you have no evidence.
In America, the burden of proof is on the accuser. Either state your evidence or move to Russia.
How many times did you convict Trump with no evidence?1?? Let's see .... Russian conspiracy, impeachment 1 impeachment 2, Jan. 6, mar -a-lago - Where is YOUR evidence?? If no evidence - YOU move to Russia!!!
Oh, and a judge already decided there was evidence of crimes at Mar-a-lardo. That's how they got the search warrant.
How many times did you convict Trump with no evidence?1?? Let's see .... Russian conspiracy, impeachment 1 impeachment 2, Jan. 6, mar -a-lago - Where is YOUR evidence?? If no evidence - YOU move to Russia!!!
There was plenty of evidence presented to the house and the senate.
But you have no evidence that Biden meddled in DOJ investigations. Zero.
Not enough evidence to convict and remove him. In the end he was aquitted, i.e., cleared of all charges, just as he was with the Mueller investigation and it appears the same with the Jan; 6 Committee. How come we never hear about that? Never, because they have nothing. Absolutely nothing
You are saying that Biden is meddling in DOJ investigations. But you have no evidence.
In America, the burden of proof is on the accuser. Either state your evidence or move to Russia.
I said the DOJ isn't independent. Biden appointed the AG and can fire him at any time. That doesn't sound very independent, does it? The only "evidence" to the contrary is a supposed "norm" that I don't trust. Then, let's add this to the pile.
Again, 100% incorrect. You 100% trust it when your side is in power (and EVEN when he/they shove it in your face that they're abusing it). And you 100% don't trust it otherwise. Awesome.