And in college they taught us not to make assertions without evidence.
So show us the evidence that Biden is meddling in the DOJ.
You've asserted they are independent without evidence.
Garland is a Democrat nominated by Joe Biden. The default assumption is they are not independent. The burden of proof is on you, or them, to show how they are independent.
No, you are 100% incorrect. Before Trump, it was, at a minimum, an accepted norm that they'd be maximally independent.
Then, you and the other Trumpers were PERFECTLY fine with Trump flaunting a completely non-independent relationship for over 4 years (on tape countless times encouraging investigations and prosecutions of his enemies, political and otherwise; and he started before he was elected).
And now, because your pathetic god is no longer in charge, you PRETEND to be concerned about a lack of independence, and insist on proof that a president is allowing independence.
You've asserted they are independent without evidence.
Garland is a Democrat nominated by Joe Biden. The default assumption is they are not independent. The burden of proof is on you, or them, to show how they are independent.
No, you are 100% incorrect. Before Trump, it was, at a minimum, an accepted norm that they'd be maximally independent.
Perhaps it was an "accepted norm" for you - and maybe it was even true - but it's not an assumption I'm willing to make without evidence.
Perhaps it was an "accepted norm" for you - and maybe it was even true - but it's not an assumption I'm willing to make without evidence.
You are saying that Biden is meddling in DOJ investigations. But you have no evidence.
In America, the burden of proof is on the accuser. Either state your evidence or move to Russia.
I said the DOJ isn't independent. Biden appointed the AG and can fire him at any time. That doesn't sound very independent, does it? The only "evidence" to the contrary is a supposed "norm" that I don't trust. Then, let's add this to the pile.
Attorney General Merrick Garland yet again emphasized, in a Wednesday interview with NBC’s Lester Holt, his bizarre claim that only right-wing extremists are to blame for political violence in the …
You are saying that Biden is meddling in DOJ investigations. But you have no evidence.
In America, the burden of proof is on the accuser. Either state your evidence or move to Russia.
I said the DOJ isn't independent. Biden appointed the AG and can fire him at any time. That doesn't sound very independent, does it? The only "evidence" to the contrary is a supposed "norm" that I don't trust.
So you are saying that you don't have any evidence that Biden has meddled in the DOJ.
And you don't actually have anything to complain about except the fact that the Constitution puts the Attorney General under the President.
I said the DOJ isn't independent. Biden appointed the AG and can fire him at any time. That doesn't sound very independent, does it? The only "evidence" to the contrary is a supposed "norm" that I don't trust.
So you are saying that you don't have any evidence that Biden has meddled in the DOJ.
And you don't actually have anything to complain about except the fact that the Constitution puts the Attorney General under the President.
Take it up with the founding fathers.
Not a complaint - just labeling it what it is. It's not, as you guys have claimed, "independent." That's to say nothing of the FBI. Hopefully I don't need to provide evidence of all their misdeeds.
I'm going to report these content-free posts for deletion. If you have an argument to make, go ahead. If you just call someone a moron with no supplementary argument, I'll report it as "low or no content post."
You are saying that Biden is meddling in DOJ investigations. But you have no evidence.
In America, the burden of proof is on the accuser. Either state your evidence or move to Russia.
I said the DOJ isn't independent. Biden appointed the AG and can fire him at any time. That doesn't sound very independent, does it? The only "evidence" to the contrary is a supposed "norm" that I don't trust. Then, let's add this to the pile.
What planet do you live on? Just because the President CAN fire the head of the DOJ doesn't mean he will or should. Again, as I told you before, you moron, this isn't Trump's Administration. Merrick Garland didn't take any orders from Biden. The White House has already commented on this. You have to PROVE that he did to further your ridiculous outrageous claim. Dumb@ss.
I said the DOJ isn't independent. Biden appointed the AG and can fire him at any time. That doesn't sound very independent, does it? The only "evidence" to the contrary is a supposed "norm" that I don't trust.
So you are saying that you don't have any evidence that Biden has meddled in the DOJ.
And you don't actually have anything to complain about except the fact that the Constitution puts the Attorney General under the President.
Take it up with the founding fathers.
Yep. He has nothing. Stupid, stupid position he is taking here.
I'm going to report these content-free posts for deletion. If you have an argument to make, go ahead. If you just call someone a moron with no supplementary argument, I'll report it as "low or no content post."
Go ahead Karen. Like I give a sh!t.
You have reported posts to the mods in the past, Karenpole.
You have reported posts to the mods in the past, Karenpole.
A handful of times EVER since I started posting here in 2001, and ONLY when someone was threatening violence. As long as you keep violence off the table, say what you want. I wear big boy pants.
I said the DOJ isn't independent. Biden appointed the AG and can fire him at any time. That doesn't sound very independent, does it? The only "evidence" to the contrary is a supposed "norm" that I don't trust. Then, let's add this to the pile.
What planet do you live on? Just because the President CAN fire the head of the DOJ doesn't mean he will or should. Again, as I told you before, you moron, this isn't Trump's Administration. Merrick Garland didn't take any orders from Biden. The White House has already commented on this. You have to PROVE that he did to further your ridiculous outrageous claim. Dumb@ss.
The fact that he can fire him proves he's not independent. Sorry this simple concept alludes you. While we're at it, by your logic, what evidence do you have that Bill Barr wasn't "independent"?
How long should the feds have let Trump keep stolen top secret documents insecurely in his basement?
The DOJ waited over a year, out of respect for the ex-prez.
What's your view on how long the DOJ should have waited? 3 years? 4? Maybe 7 or 8? Give me a round estimate. I'm curious.
If this were an urgent issue, they should have (and probably would have) done the raid ASAP. If not, never.
Are you TRYING to say the dumbest possible things? The DOJ and FBI are between a rock and a hard place here. IF they had gone for a search warrant IMMEDIATLEY, you dumb Trump mother f*ckers would be crying foul..."They didn't even ASK for them back. They didn't even issue a subpoena."
So, the DOJ and FBI treats Trump with UNDESERVED respect and patience until it is clear he is not going to return the materials before they issue a search warrant, and you want to b!tch like a little b!tch about that.
Do you feed and dress yourself? You are one dumb f*cker.
