"Pandemic of the unvaccinated" CONFIRMED

I love how this thread always dies when the weekly numbers showing the "pandemic of the unvaccinated" arrive.

2600 bro wrote:

I love how this thread always dies when the weekly numbers showing the "pandemic of the unvaccinated" arrive.

It's sad you have to keep bumping your own thread.

Harambe/2600broReverseCowgirl wrote:

2600 bro wrote:

I love how this thread always dies when the weekly numbers showing the "pandemic of the unvaccinated" arrive.

It's sad you have to keep bumping your own thread.

Usually others do it instead ;)

Harambe/2600broReverseCowgirl wrote:

2600 bro wrote:

I love how this thread always dies when the weekly numbers showing the "pandemic of the unvaccinated" arrive.

It's sad you have to keep bumping your own thread.

There are more anti-vax morons panic replying than anything else.

Well, anyways, howdy partners?

Mandates, wonderful mandates knocking at your front door.

Guidance for you nitwits. would you like a tour?

2600 bro wrote:

I love how this thread always dies when the weekly numbers showing the "pandemic of the unvaccinated" arrive.

It's disingenuous to name it as such.

The virus was man made. Why were US researchers investing in Gain of Function Research and outsourcing to China?

We went for 14 months with no vaccine. Why don't you and Brofessor Hubris acknowledge this?

formerly present wrote:

Sorry to be a broken record, but NY is also a troll, like TU and SV and DG. Just ignore--nothing you post will change his/her shtick.

For sure - they've all been obvious trolls from the get-go. Just too much fun to punch the bag a few times a day. The sad part is that their trolling has descended into a narcissistic identity. They NEED to be here. They NEED to engage. They NEED to hear their own ideas broadcast. Sad.

Truly a Pandemic of the Unvaccinated.

Disco Gary the Biggest Loser wrote:

formerly present wrote:

Sorry to be a broken record, but NY is also a troll, like TU and SV and DG. Just ignore--nothing you post will change his/her shtick.

For sure - they've all been obvious trolls from the get-go. Just too much fun to punch the bag a few times a day. The sad part is that their trolling has descended into a narcissistic identity. They NEED to be here. They NEED to engage. They NEED to hear their own ideas broadcast. Sad.

Truly a Pandemic of the Unvaccinated.

There's that same IP address again.

Harambe/2600broReverseCowgirl wrote:

Disco Gary the Biggest Loser wrote:

For sure - they've all been obvious trolls from the get-go. Just too much fun to punch the bag a few times a day. The sad part is that their trolling has descended into a narcissistic identity. They NEED to be here. They NEED to engage. They NEED to hear their own ideas broadcast. Sad.

Truly a Pandemic of the Unvaccinated.

There's that same IP address again.

Where do you want me to mail the straw to?

2600 broscience wrote:

2600 bro wrote:

I love how this thread always dies when the weekly numbers showing the "pandemic of the unvaccinated" arrive.

It's disingenuous to name it as such.

There's no doubt it's -currently- a pandemic of the unvaccinated considering a vast majority of current hospitalizations and deaths could be prevented with the vaccine.

This is NOT hard to understand.

What do you all think of this?

I am not a doctor nor an expert on viruses. But seems like there are going to be mutations with or without a vaccine. Delta was in an are without a vaccine.

We should hope to vaccinated to slow the spread and hope to stop mutations that can evolve and spread that are more contagious and or more lethal or have long lasting consequences. We may need another type of vaccine in the future if it does mutate.

This is not a good argument against vaccines.

https://twitter.com/ScienceWDrDoug/status/1445094457666310146?s=20

DanM wrote:

Can you post the numbers for patients who are in that hospital without being formally admitted. You know, that old trick called observation status.

Thanking you in advance.

Can you explain what this means? I work in a hospital and don't know what your definition of "observation status" is.

Where i work, the definition of a patient with Covid is one who is being treated for COVID.

username in 2021 wrote:

What do you all think of this?

I am not a doctor nor an expert on viruses. But seems like there are going to be mutations with or without a vaccine. Delta was in an are without a vaccine.

We should hope to vaccinated to slow the spread and hope to stop mutations that can evolve and spread that are more contagious and or more lethal or have long lasting consequences. We may need another type of vaccine in the future if it does mutate.

This is not a good argument against vaccines.

Delta is not even particularly immune evasive.

It is simply much, much more infectious and transmissible. There are other strains that are even worse neutralized by current vaccine-induced antibodies (Mu, for example, IIRC), that just get out competed by Delta because it replicates and transmits so far.

Antibody binding is only part of the equation.

So yeah that link is not good.

From the CDC, no way this skews anything...LOL!

In general, people are considered fully vaccinated: ±

2 weeks after their second dose in a 2-dose series, such as the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines, or

2 weeks after a single-dose vaccine, such as Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen vaccine

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/fully-vaccinated.html

"Biden fixed COVID" - Harambe March 2021

That would be 7 months ago.

He claims to have never been wrong.

Fauci isn't ready to commit to "allow us" to see our relatives for Christmas.

7 months.

Harambe mocked natural immunity, has now back tracked.

Claims he is never wrong.

Harambe claims he is only trying to help. But mocks anyone with a different viewpoint. Provides cherry picked data, much like the government, which leads to lack of trust. Then wonders why people don't listen.

Harambe is a hack. Likely works for the government.

Don't be like Harambe or his mini-brained-me - 2600.

BidenFixedCovid wrote:

From the CDC, no way this skews anything...LOL!

In general, people are considered fully vaccinated: ±

2 weeks after their second dose in a 2-dose series, such as the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines, or

2 weeks after a single-dose vaccine, such as Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen vaccine

That’s been the definition from the start. Very conservative from the original trials. Luckily for you they also track “partially vaccinated!”

The data is out there just as you’d like it :)

I think you missed the argument/point that was trying to be made in the Twitter thread. It isn’t about delta.

The issue is that vaccines are going to lead to covid mutations will survive that the vaccine will not be effective and where the unvaccinated may be better off than the vaccinated. I know it is a stretch.

Or to a mutation where current vaccines will not be effective to either the vaccinated or unvaccinated.

My thoughts are that may happen but will that mutation be as contagious or as deadly or harmful as ones now? What are the odds of it being worse than mutations that will evolve in an environment without a good amount of the population is vaccinated?

SameStory wrote:

DanM wrote:

Can you post the numbers for patients who are in that hospital without being formally admitted. You know, that old trick called observation status.

Thanking you in advance.

Can you explain what this means? I work in a hospital and don't know what your definition of "observation status" is.

Where i work, the definition of a patient with Covid is one who is being treated for COVID.

Harambe wrote:

DanM wrote:

Can you post the numbers for patients who are in that hospital without being formally admitted. You know, that old trick called observation status.

Thanking you in advance.

You have zero evidence this “trick” is in use at all, let alone widespread during this wave. You are faced with unassailable evidence that vaccines work extremely well and are desperately searching for ways to discredit.

Why not just accept that the vax works? What is so hard about that?

Why not just accept that it doesn't work and has killed 1000's that have had it? Why not? Doesn't fit your liberal agenda, your Bow down to Biden and Fan Flagpole lifestyle?

Funny how any link that doesn't fit your agenda is fake, but your biased ones are real. Feel better now?

Idiot alert Idiot alert wrote:

Harambe wrote:

You have zero evidence this “trick” is in use at all, let alone widespread during this wave. You are faced with unassailable evidence that vaccines work extremely well and are desperately searching for ways to discredit.

Why not just accept that the vax works? What is so hard about that?

Why not just accept that it doesn't work and has killed 1000's that have had it? Why not? Doesn't fit your liberal agenda, your Bow down to Biden and Fan Flagpole lifestyle?

Funny how any link that doesn't fit your agenda is fake, but your biased ones are real. Feel better now?

Presented without evidence. As usual.

The Unkle wrote:

Of course natural immunity is better than the vax. Just like is the case with every other disease we vax for.

Don't fall for the Big Pharma lies.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bamaEMftg4

Well, you would be right if you weren't wrong. You're wrong.