ah having had a president who uses organized crime as a role model. what could go wrong? Sam Stein @samstein Trump, in a long statement, says he pleaded the 5th today in front of the NY AG
Eric Holder and Lois Lerner both refused to testify before Congress about their behavior...No repercussions for them....
What is your point? In Holder's case, it wasn't without Republicans trying to have Holder criminally charged. A judge decided that the Contempt charge was unwarranted. So far Mark Meadows hasn't been charged with Contempt of Congress. You just like throwing out random facts that have no bearing on anything?
There is not a national politician in my lifetime (so yours also) in the United States who is more criminal than Donald Trump. You back a criminal POS loser. Stop it.
And "Flagpole" was able to find gas in his locale at a much lower price.
So it's a good thing that "former present" talked about the NATIONAL average and provided a link to support it, so we can avoid being distracted by local variation. Flagpole's example and yours don't mean squat.
Maybe "former present" should mention what gas prices were when Joe Biden took office
Using the political power of the White House to investigate a political rival is not an “accomplishment.” Raising taxes on the middle class when you promised you wouldn’t is not an “accomplishment.” Claiming you don’t know what the FBI is doing is not an “accomplishment.” Being Dork Brandon is not an “accomplishment.”
You mean the Russian collusion hoax the Hillary campaing foisted on us in 2016?
Anyone familiar with basic stats can see the votes that were counted in the days following the election in 2020 in PA, Wisc, and Mi in only the presidential race that were 90% for Biden werr bogus. No doubt the same oligarchs who cheated Bernie for Hillary and then Biden stole the 2020 general election.
By the way, you failed to answer my question.
What wars did Trump lie us into?
Bush/Cheney and then Obama/Biden/Clinton lied us into several
If only today's "liberals" realized this is why Liz Cheney (note the last name) hates Trump
Yes, I should answer every question about bad things that Trump didn't do. Don't be a moran.
About Russia and 2016, you still want to pretend that the R-led Senate intelligence committee DIDN'T find that Russia interfered in the election and Trump and his campaign had inappropriate contact with them? Donny tells you it wasn't so, and so you believe it?
It's THIS simple: MUCH of what you believe about this country and world comes from the mind and mouth Donald Trump, the most obvious liar in the world. Beyond pathetic.
Lastly, WHERE OR WHERE are all of these R lawyers who DO understand "basic stats" and make convincing cases about significant election irregularities? Almost 2 years, now. Really, WHERE ARE THEY ??? Or, why don't YOU do it ???
Oh my God.
Clinging to the Russian intefence hoax?
Math does not lie
Very good sign that someone is a brainwashed Trumper: They type "clinging" and "hoax" in the same short sentence.
You know, "conservatives" believing bad - if untrue or inaccurate - things about liberals makes some sense.
And "conservatives" not believing bad things about "conservatives" (not including the essentially apolitical Trump) makes some sense.
What STILL doesn't make a lot of sense to me is SO many "conservatives" deciding that Trump is great?
Why do that exercise in stupidity? Hate liberals. Fine. Love real conservative politicians who want to fight tooth and nail with the liberals. Fine. But Trump? You NEED Trump? The package the liberal fighter is wrapped in means nothing to you? Even if it's the worst package of any public servant in U.S. history (and MIGHT even bring down the country as we know it) ??
And it results in you looking SO stupid over and over again. Like in this instance. Hard to believe that Putin would interfere in a U.S. election? OF COURSE NOT. Hard to believe that Trump would do pretty much anything to advance his own interests? OF COURSE NOT. Ample bi-partisan evidence and agreement about both Russian interference and Trump team interaction with those Russians? YES. And yet here you stand, STILL putting "clinging" and "hoax" in the same sentence about it.
Remember when Sandy Berger was caught with his pants down (figuratively) while he was stealing classified documents from the National Archives by stuffing the documents in his pants, socks and underwear and cutting them up? Those were the good old days!
To all you Biden-Huggers: Don’t waste your time making your arguments. Nobody on our side is listening any longer. Fake Russia, fake women, fake presidents, and fake voters have done you in. See you at the polls (and at the counting rooms after the election -- oh, yeah, we’ll be there this time).
To all you Biden-Huggers: Don’t waste your time making your arguments. Nobody on our side is listening any longer. Fake Russia, fake women, fake presidents, and fake voters have done you in. See you at the polls (and at the counting rooms after the election -- oh, yeah, we’ll be there this time).
Bleat on, sheep.
You were never listening to reason. But you listen to a massive liar douche and his douchettes. Look in the mirror for a sheep.
Hey, wouldn't it be great if the "law & order!" folks would, you know, obey the law?
It's embarrassing how ignorant today's "liberals" are about the FBI and its history
Here's some recent history you're very conveniently avoiding:
- The current FBI Director is a guy named "Wray."
- Appointed BY Trump EARLY in Trump's term (Aug17).
Surely, the great swamp drainer Trump would have appointed a fellow swamp drainer. And if he wasn't doing so, would have fired him, right? But, of course, Wray was there at the end. HOW could that be? Does Trump not really care about draining swamps? Or, is he just incapable of finding/hiring/supervising capable people? Or is he actually kind of scared of standing up to and/or firing certain people? Or....???
The knots you guys so easily tie yourself into by blindly believing/parroting the crap from your tribe.
It's embarrassing how ignorant today's "liberals" are about the FBI and its history
Here's some recent history you're very conveniently avoiding:
- The current FBI Director is a guy named "Wray."
- Appointed BY Trump EARLY in Trump's term (Aug17).
Surely, the great swamp drainer Trump would have appointed a fellow swamp drainer. And if he wasn't doing so, would have fired him, right? But, of course, Wray was there at the end. HOW could that be? Does Trump not really care about draining swamps? Or, is he just incapable of finding/hiring/supervising capable people? Or is he actually kind of scared of standing up to and/or firing certain people? Or....???
The knots you guys so easily tie yourself into by blindly believing/parroting the crap from your tribe.
Trump wasn't capable of draining the swamp, probably due to incompetence or bad advice. That doesn't mean the FBI isn't rotten to the core.
Eric Holder and Lois Lerner both refused to testify before Congress about their behavior...No repercussions for them....
What is your point? In Holder's case, it wasn't without Republicans trying to have Holder criminally charged. A judge decided that the Contempt charge was unwarranted. So far Mark Meadows hasn't been charged with Contempt of Congress. You just like throwing out random facts that have no bearing on anything?
There is not a national politician in my lifetime (so yours also) in the United States who is more criminal than Donald Trump. You back a criminal POS loser. Stop it.
Trump has been more investigated than any President in History and has never been charged witha crime...Liberals are simply delusional...
What is your point? In Holder's case, it wasn't without Republicans trying to have Holder criminally charged. A judge decided that the Contempt charge was unwarranted. So far Mark Meadows hasn't been charged with Contempt of Congress. You just like throwing out random facts that have no bearing on anything?
There is not a national politician in my lifetime (so yours also) in the United States who is more criminal than Donald Trump. You back a criminal POS loser. Stop it.
Trump has been more investigated than any President in History and has never been charged witha crime...Liberals are simply delusional...
Wait till Nov. and watch them go bonkers...
Trump dodged prosecution when he was in office because the DOJ doesn't charge sitting Presidents. He is GOING to be indicted, probably on several things from multiple states. The REASON that Trump is the most investigated President in history is because he's the most criminal President in history.
Don't get all geeked about November. Midterms go to the party that is not in power. Big deal. I'm actually glad it works out that way. Also, we're too far down the line now for a change in The House to matter regarding Trump. The DOJ is clearly on the case, and that will continue as will stuff in NY and GA regardless of whether there is a Jan. 6 Committee.
You support a criminal. You should ask yourself why that is.
To all you Biden-Huggers: Don’t waste your time making your arguments. Nobody on our side is listening any longer. Fake Russia, fake women, fake presidents, and fake voters have done you in. See you at the polls (and at the counting rooms after the election -- oh, yeah, we’ll be there this time).
Bleat on, sheep.
That competes for the dumbest comment ever in this thread, and with Sally around, that's saying something. Congratulations!
Breaking: FBI delivers subpoenas to several Pa. Republican lawmakers. This comes after a search warrant was executed at Mar-a-Lago and Republican Congressman Scott Perry of PA had a warrant executed on him yesterday in which his cell phone was imaged.
Not listening to libs any longer. See you in November.
Go watch Colbert or something. Go make a movie. Go win an Oscar. OOOOOH, go visit a Disney Park. Go spend 5 dollars for a gallon of gas and tell yourself how lucky you are. Go defend some “president” who shakes hands with invisible people. Go try to vote 81 million times. Go mostly peacefully demonstrate in support of some criminal.
“The mob takes the Fifth,” Trump said “If you’re innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?”
“When you have your staff taking the Fifth Amendment, taking the Fifth so they’re not prosecuted, when you have the man that set up the illegal server taking the Fifth, I think it’s disgraceful,” he said.
Trump has also, of course, said that merely being under investigation is a very bad thing. Late in 2016, he suggested a criminal investigation would handcuff the next president and hurt the country. It was to be avoided at all costs.
Most honest people I know are not under FBI investigation, let alone two. https://t.co/UcSmSA5aTj — Kellyanne Conway (@KellyannePolls) October 29, 2016
When you're attacking FBI agents because you're under criminal investigation, you're losing https://t.co/SIoAxatCjp — Sarah Huckabee Sanders (@SarahHuckabee) November 3, 2016
