cheater watcher.... wrote:
I generally enjoy Rich Roll's podcast. I enjoyed his book. I understand who he is. He is a mediocre LD runner with a great story. And yes, he is always selling stuff to make a living. He is a great interviewer. I like him. The first time I listened to this segment on WG, he swayed me a bit. Rich Roll was convinced it was totally legit because he "knows Robby and the video guy". " no effin way"! But then I went out on a run and thought about the exact words that were said in that short segment. Essentially what proof was given in that interview that WG was telling the truth.? There was absolutely nothing! Here are some of the odd things I saw:
1. If you watch the portion where he talks about the watch and woop his answers are short and defensive. You also see him fidgeting and spinning in the chair like he is uncomfortable. It would be interesting to have a body language expert interpret that segment.
2. They chuckle and WG even brags a bit about how he had no watch and had to borrow someones else's. How does that statement not have a follow up question from Rich like WTF? You have all this money dumped into this project, sponsors all lined up and you forgot to have a rock solid GPS watch of your own on your wrist (and 2 or 3 back ups)? That is total BS. These guys are totally into tech and social media yet they play this game that they are salt of the earth, natural runners that can't be bothered with watch technology. They revert to this story that they are infants in understanding of GPS watches because they are just pure runners. Robbie even turns off his Heart rate monitor and even maps feature on some of his feats for money. They know how to work technology.
2 Then we have the defense that "did the other guy have heart rate data"? Well of course not! The point is that your HR data shows something dishonest. Not whether you have data or not. That is pure gaslighting.
3. Rich very quickly jumps in and rescues Wil with his line "HR data is BS". HR data is not BS! Heart rate data can be wonky. Heart rate data can at times pick up cadence. But there are no instances of Heart rate data dropping out of the sky and sitting at 105 BPM for enormous stretches of 60 mile runs when the runner is supposed to be running through mountains in a transcon.
The more I think back about this entire interview, the more I realize it was two guys (buddies) selling stuff. A big commerical. There was no goal of diving in for truth in an investigative manner. So nothing learned here.
Thank you for your measured and thoughtful reply CW. You were willing to give RR every chance in the book, but he has still let you down.
Make no mistake, this is quickly morphing into a multi-million dollar operation - approaching the significance of the Liver King, who is currently being sued £25m for false advertising.
WG has about six very major sponsors and some 30-40 minor ones who he still pushes hard for and allows him to live his wonderful lifestyle. The overwhelming message from WG and RR is a simple one: He has become one of the most successful, effortless, skilful, pioneering and fasionable ultrarunners in the world, and states he has been helped enormously in this endeavour by the support of NuCalm helping him sleep and recover, and Puresport for their 20 or so products to help his body fire.
Your note about just sitting at 105 while climbing mountains on 60 mile days is spot on. Identical with RB too. And this is over 4.5 years about half a dozen watches and up to 8 different events. Day 12 at Transcon is the perfect example. It's one of the finest pieces of multiday running you could see - IF IT'S TRUE! His comment on it is "Sheeeeeeet she was a good one." The day is almost total climbing. Elevation is 623m. The pace a wicked 7:19 per km, and just 10:51 required for the 89k. Calories required is a very minimal 6295. He was up at around 9,500 when I observed [for far slower flatter days].
How did he do it? Sadly, his watch locks and freezes at 72 for the first 50k, too bad... but it's working for the last 39, but just splutters along, during hours of searingly tough distance running at a mere 91-117bpm. For instance, loads of climbing Ks around 6:20 pace, at around 60k with the Hr at 115avg. Even Kostelnick and Lawson would take a deep breath at this particular day. To compare for instance, Lawson ran 99k for day 9 at his Jogle WR at 8:40 pace - compared to this 7:19. Day 10 was 9:22 pace.
It is shocking to compare the 89k here's pace with WGs California 100 in an official race:
Transcon 89k in 10:51 Max HR 119 Calories 6,295
California 89k in 13:23 Max HR 169 Calories 9,000 [9,766 for 97k]
We can compare more by giving 20k splits:
Transcon 0-20: 2:23
Cali 0-20: 2:25
So... he's doing Transcon at the same pace as a one off 100 mile race, where he's in around 24th/250 at this stage.
Transcon 21-40: 2:33
Cali 21-40: 2:49
A lot of climbing in Cali, but Transcon was all uphill too. But he really is starting to destroy himself now. This next segment is easy in Cali, but very tough at Transcon. Let's see what happens:
Transcon 41-60: 2:25
Cali 41-60: 3:05
The Transcon pace is set like a riveter: a 2:23, 2:33, 2:25, while the Cali race is 2:25, 2:49, 3:05, identifying an authentic natural fade.
Transcon 61-80: 2:18
Cali 61-80: 3:23
He has now started to actually speed up late in the day at Transcon [as he so often does - completely against what they say in commentary, which is to hit the mornings hard and relax in the afternoons]; and instead of taking 2 mins out of himself, he's taking 1hr5.
Transcon 80-89: 1:12
Cali 80-89: 1:39
Still no Transcon fade, while Cali fade continues and he'd be scraped off the course 8k later. Those last 8k took 1:42 and that doesn't include rest time.