J.R. wrote:
smell the coffee, wrote:Drugs don't work on sicknesses? How about in the prevention of polio, tetanus, measles, yellow fever, malaria, Typhoid, and diphtheria, to name a few?
All of those diseases were caused by poor sanitation practices, poor immune systems and increased by drugs, including vaccinations which have caused the deaths of millions of people. Improving sanitation was opposed by those promoting the drugs, and they still push drugs ahead of having healthy constitutions, which drugs destroy.
No, diabetics do not profit from the quackery of insulin injections, and similar answers to your other questions, which you should be able to see for yourself.
Drugs HAVE effects on bodily functions by virtue of chemical reactions to them. That has been demonstrated for many centuries. That you don't want to accept that face is your personal decision, but that does not align with reality.
You're delusional and making stuff up.
I have always posted that drugs affect the body in dangerous ways, certainly in no ways that aid performance more than anything that is normal without drugs.
Too many cheats in the sport now. That will result in those who really are fans of the sport to lose interest and respect for the top performers.
What you mean is too many drugs in the sport, of which you keep promoting the use of.
Please do get anesthesized before your next race and then post about how much it helps you run faster.
I tend to agree with you in general about drugs and big pharma. Even things like clinical trials have major concerns with generalizability and you NEVER know what other, less intended effects a drug may be having.
However, it often seems like you scorn all of science in general. This is odd because (not talking drugs/clinical trials) experiments are done by rigor and must be reproducible by others for verification and publication. If scientist A publishes that knocking out gene A causes effect A, scientist B has to be able to do what scientist A did and get the same result. If not the data doesn't make it to publication...or gets thrown out if problems are discovered later.
That's the thing that's good about science, if you think the results are nonsense one can do the experiment themselves.
Yeah right, like swine flu, bird flu, and ebola, all of them created by big pharma.
Ignoring the absurdity of concept that drugs don't do anything to people yet big pharma can somehow make bad "drugs" that kill people...you must believe there are a TON of really, really fvcking evil people in the world if they are making these diseases and unleashing them on the world.
You'd be talking thousands of people all in on slaughtering other humans with diseases. If you believe that's really how people are, then so it is, but all my experiences have certainly not led me anywhere near that conclusion.