Quality posters only01/20/2017 2:24am EST7 years ago
Who you got, the bikers or the liberal whiners? I'm thinking the bikers in a landslide.LRC Note: This thread was inititially titled, "Official LRC President Donald J Trump Inauguration Thread " and is the thread to discuss/...
How long can the internet survive the transparent delusion of security?
The wealthy and powerful have to have figured out by now to keep anything sensitive air-gapped. Only insignificant people not worth ripping off or scandalizing are safe.
NYT turning on Brandon could mean the 4chan leak is a soft coup. Some shady Joe business will be found and the media will use it to ruin him instead of calling it Russian propaganda.
Question is, who will they try to replace him with? They may flip back to a GOP figure for 2024, realizing he's so bad that no Democrat can win.
Democrats don't realize how much trouble they're in for the midterms. Price of being delusional
NYT has a couple of good stories on Trump now - one says that they hurried the Hutchinson hearing because she was being tampered with by Trump's organized crime stooges.
The other is even more interesting and explains why that witness tampering took place - that the evidence Hutchinson presented makes a criminal prosecution of Trump more likely. DOJ didn't know that Trump knew the mob was armed and wanted it to march on Congress anyway, with him at its head. That's insurrection and sedition and it's a crime.
Maybe this will speed up the glacial efforts at DOJ. Although the next R president will just pardon the guy.
WASHINGTON — For the past year and a half, the Justice Department has approached former President Donald J. Trump’s effort to overturn the 2020 election results with a follow-the-evidence strategy that to critics appeared to border on paralysis — and that limited discussions of his role, even inside the department. Then came Cassidy Hutchinson. The electrifying public testimony delivered last month to the House Jan. 6 panel by Ms. Hutchinson, a former White House aide who was witness to many key moments, jolted top Justice Department officials into discussing the topic of Mr. Trump more directly, at times in the presence of Attorney General Merrick B. Garland and Deputy Attorney General Lisa O. Monaco. In conversations at the department the day after Ms. Hutchinson’s appearance, some of which included Ms. Monaco, officials talked about the pressure that the testimony created to scrutinize Mr. Trump’s potential criminal culpability and whether he intended to break the law. Ms. Hutchinson’s disclosures seemed to have opened a path to broaching the most sensitive topic of all: Mr. Trump’s own actions ahead of the attack. Department officials have said Ms. Hutchinson’s testimony did not alter their investigative strategy to methodically work their way from lower-level actors up to higher rungs of power. “The only pressure I feel, and the only pressure that our line prosecutors feel, is to do the right thing,” Mr. Garland said this spring.
But some of her explosive assertions — that Mr. Trump knew some of his supporters at a rally on Jan. 6, 2021, were armed, that he desperately wanted to join them as they marched to the Capitol and that the White House’s top lawyer feared Mr. Trump’s conduct could lead to criminal charges — were largely new to them and grabbed their attention.
Actually, none were armed. The Deep State is calling flags weapons.
NYT has a couple of good stories on Trump now - one says that they hurried the Hutchinson hearing because she was being tampered with by Trump's organized crime stooges.
The other is even more interesting and explains why that witness tampering took place - that the evidence Hutchinson presented makes a criminal prosecution of Trump more likely. DOJ didn't know that Trump knew the mob was armed and wanted it to march on Congress anyway, with him at its head. That's insurrection and sedition and it's a crime.
Maybe this will speed up the glacial efforts at DOJ. Although the next R president will just pardon the guy.
WASHINGTON — For the past year and a half, the Justice Department has approached former President Donald J. Trump’s effort to overturn the 2020 election results with a follow-the-evidence strategy that to critics appeared to border on paralysis — and that limited discussions of his role, even inside the department. Then came Cassidy Hutchinson. The electrifying public testimony delivered last month to the House Jan. 6 panel by Ms. Hutchinson, a former White House aide who was witness to many key moments, jolted top Justice Department officials into discussing the topic of Mr. Trump more directly, at times in the presence of Attorney General Merrick B. Garland and Deputy Attorney General Lisa O. Monaco. In conversations at the department the day after Ms. Hutchinson’s appearance, some of which included Ms. Monaco, officials talked about the pressure that the testimony created to scrutinize Mr. Trump’s potential criminal culpability and whether he intended to break the law. Ms. Hutchinson’s disclosures seemed to have opened a path to broaching the most sensitive topic of all: Mr. Trump’s own actions ahead of the attack. Department officials have said Ms. Hutchinson’s testimony did not alter their investigative strategy to methodically work their way from lower-level actors up to higher rungs of power. “The only pressure I feel, and the only pressure that our line prosecutors feel, is to do the right thing,” Mr. Garland said this spring.
But some of her explosive assertions — that Mr. Trump knew some of his supporters at a rally on Jan. 6, 2021, were armed, that he desperately wanted to join them as they marched to the Capitol and that the White House’s top lawyer feared Mr. Trump’s conduct could lead to criminal charges — were largely new to them and grabbed their attention.
Actually, none were armed. The Deep State is calling flags weapons.
I see a lot of "Trump" mentioned there but not once did I see Biden's name mentioned. Please keep the Trump stuff on the Trump thread. It is not that difficult.
Actually, none were armed. The Deep State is calling flags weapons.
I see a lot of "Trump" mentioned there but not once did I see Biden's name mentioned. Please keep the Trump stuff on the Trump thread. It is not that difficult.
I see a lot of "Trump" mentioned there but not once did I see Biden's name mentioned. Please keep the Trump stuff on the Trump thread. It is not that difficult.
Replying to the wrong guy
My apologies. Agip's quote should have been included.
I just got back from El Paso where I had some breakfast tacos (as I do on any trip to Texas). Now I didn’t use it in a simile like the First Lady, but my report of my trip to the border was taken down none-the-less. I never knew breakfast tacos were so offensive.
Film critic Armond White raved on the new film My Son Hunter, praising director Robert Davi and producer Phelim McAleer for turning “a political argument into a work of art.” White made the point that the movie shows more eth...
What a joke this country has become? Can you imagine all the time spent over the past six years on the alleged Trump family crimes. And now a trove of information on the Biden Crime Family. Nothing from the FBI and Justice Department. Truly corrupt Deep State.
What a joke this country has become? Can you imagine all the time spent over the past six years on the alleged Trump family crimes. And now a trove of information on the Biden Crime Family. Nothing from the FBI and Justice Department. Truly corrupt Deep State.
What a joke this country has become? Can you imagine all the time spent over the past six years on the alleged Trump family crimes. And now a trove of information on the Biden Crime Family. Nothing from the FBI and Justice Department. Truly corrupt Deep State.