It's an idiotic take to begin with - the idea that any federal or state department or agency, or any business in America, affected by a Supreme Court ruling shouldn't read the actual ruling. It's just a demented proposition that no one with the slightest idea of how American society and business operates would buy into.TheAnd keep in mind that the only reason Sally conjured up this manifestly stupid idea, that no one will ever follow, was to try and support that lying, discredited Oh? poster's FAKE news assertion that "The Pentagon stated that they will ignore the decrees of the Supreme Court." According to Sally, the mere common sense act of reading a SCOTUS opinion actually shows an intent to defy and ignore it. Are you sure you want to line up with that kind of mentality?
This is all that matters. The military or anyone else doesn't need to read anything. Just this from the decision ..
"We end this opinion where we began. Abortion presents a profound moral question. The Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating or prohibiting abortion. Roe and Casey arrogated that authority. We now overrule those decisions and return that authority to the people and their elected representatives."
They have overruled all previous decisions and have returned the authority of having regulatine an abortion or prohibiting an abortion to the states. That is all Lloyd Austin and everyone else in the military and DOJ need to read.
No, no, no. You are confusing what you think is the minimum you need to read for purposes of uninformed B-team level trolling on a message board, with what someone who actually has a job, subordinates, a budget and accountability to others needs to read to diligently perform that job. Two different things. Different as chalk and cheese. Different as frick and frack. Different as donuts and blowholes.
This is all that matters. The military or anyone else doesn't need to read anything. Just this from the decision ..
"We end this opinion where we began. Abortion presents a profound moral question. The Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating or prohibiting abortion. Roe and Casey arrogated that authority. We now overrule those decisions and return that authority to the people and their elected representatives."
They have overruled all previous decisions and have returned the authority of having regulatine an abortion or prohibiting an abortion to the states. That is all Lloyd Austin and everyone else in the military and DOJ need to read.
No, no, no. You are confusing what you think is the minimum you need to read for purposes of uninformed B-team level trolling on a message board, with what someone who actually has a job, subordinates, a budget and accountability to others needs to read to diligently perform that job. Two different things. Different as chalk and cheese. Different as frick and frack. Different as donuts and blowholes.
No, no, no. You are confusing what you think is the minimum you need to read for purposes of uninformed B-team level trolling on a message board, with what someone who actually has a job, subordinates, a budget and accountability to others needs to read to diligently perform that job. Two different things. Different as chalk and cheese. Different as frick and frack. Different as donuts and blowholes.
Did you read it?
Yeah, I read it. The whole shebang, even the goofball dissent. The whole nine yards, I read. Read the whole thing carefully once, and have since referred to portions of it several times.
Go ahead, ask me anything. Ask me anything about Dobbs. I know that stuff upside down, right front to left back. I even read the fine print in the goddam footnotes, that's how much I know Dobbs. Ask me anything, and I will set you straight one way or the other on this stuff.
Yeah, I read it. The whole shebang, even the goofball dissent. The whole nine yards, I read. Read the whole thing carefully once, and have since referred to portions of it several times.
Go ahead, ask me anything. Ask me anything about Dobbs. I know that stuff upside down, right front to left back. I even read the fine print in the goddam footnotes, that's how much I know Dobbs. Ask me anything, and I will set you straight one way or the other on this stuff.
Other than the three-sentence summary, what are some things in the majority opinion that businesses need to know about?
If you haven't watched then you can't make such a judgement.
The hearings mostly just feature the testimony of Republicans from the Trump administration and Republicans from state governments. These are people who voted for Trump and have always been considered Trump allies.
But since you are afraid of what they might say, you hide yourself from the truth.
And I guess when admittedly "anti-mob" prosecutors have parades of mobsters testifying against other mobsters we should always acquit on all counts. Genius.
Just another depressing reminder of how far this country has fallen. The D committee with 2 solid Rs (including 1 particularly conservative R) lines up one formerly or CURRENTLY Trump-sympathetic witness after another to explain how Trump tried to steal an election and.....it means nothing to a large minority of the country. JUST partisan. Meaningless. Kangaroos and such. Up IS down......
The problem is that they are afraid to watch. Nobody wants to admit to themselves that they were conned.
Yeah, I read it. The whole shebang, even the goofball dissent. The whole nine yards, I read. Read the whole thing carefully once, and have since referred to portions of it several times.
Go ahead, ask me anything. Ask me anything about Dobbs. I know that stuff upside down, right front to left back. I even read the fine print in the goddam footnotes, that's how much I know Dobbs. Ask me anything, and I will set you straight one way or the other on this stuff.
How many pages is the dissent and who authored it. No looking.
Yeah, I read it. The whole shebang, even the goofball dissent. The whole nine yards, I read. Read the whole thing carefully once, and have since referred to portions of it several times.
Go ahead, ask me anything. Ask me anything about Dobbs. I know that stuff upside down, right front to left back. I even read the fine print in the goddam footnotes, that's how much I know Dobbs. Ask me anything, and I will set you straight one way or the other on this stuff.
How many pages is the dissent and who authored it. No looking.
The dissent is just a political document. It is unable to argue the constitutionaliy of Roe but must resort to political and moral arguments.
Two trump attorneys get their phones seized by the g-men.
The seizure of Mr. Eastman’s phone appears to have come on the same day that federal agents also seized the phone of Jeffrey Clark, a former Justice Department official who was central to Mr. Trump’s attempts to coerce the country’s top prosecutors into backing his false claims of fraud in the election.
I'm goin' down, down, down, down I'm goin' down, down, down, down I'm goin' down, down, down, down I'm goin' down, down, down, down
'I thought the article released online, it's going to be printed tomorrow in the Times, was good. I think you're clear,' Joe said in the voicemail to Hunter.
pretty amazing that this supreme court is 100% fine with tax dollars going to religious institutions. Which is almost exactly what the framers of the constitution wanted to avoid.
Maine has to send tax dollars to religious schools....and religious football coaches are invited to call their teams to prayer.
And yeah the 'conservatives' call this originalism.
If there is a surprise witness, then I agree that Cipollone is very probably the one. Cheney specifically gave a shout-out for him to come testify. That's the only potential witness who was name-checked in that way.
For those who don't know, Cipollone had John Dean's old job. And if you know anything about Watergate, you know what it means for the White House Counsel to testify.
I don't think they would put him on TV before deposing him privately. So it makes me wonder how they could have pulled that off without someone in the press finding out.
pretty amazing that this supreme court is 100% fine with tax dollars going to religious institutions. Which is almost exactly what the framers of the constitution wanted to avoid.
Maine has to send tax dollars to religious schools....and religious football coaches are invited to call their teams to prayer.
And yeah the 'conservatives' call this originalism.
Those funds can't be used to fund religious worship or instruction but only to support the non-religious social services that they provide.
pretty amazing that this supreme court is 100% fine with tax dollars going to religious institutions. Which is almost exactly what the framers of the constitution wanted to avoid.
Maine has to send tax dollars to religious schools....and religious football coaches are invited to call their teams to prayer.
And yeah the 'conservatives' call this originalism.
And you prefer that our tax dollars go to drag shows in elementary schools. Cope harder.
pretty amazing that this supreme court is 100% fine with tax dollars going to religious institutions. Which is almost exactly what the framers of the constitution wanted to avoid.
Maine has to send tax dollars to religious schools....and religious football coaches are invited to call their teams to prayer.
And yeah the 'conservatives' call this originalism.
Those funds can't be used to fund religious worship or instruction but only to support the non-religious social services that they provide.
Funds are fungible. As a result, your comment is meaningless.
I agree with the decision, but it would be quite crass to celebrate.
And I agree with women who contend that as a man, I have less standing in the debate.
I would hope that since there will now be a lot more babies to take care of, Republicans would join Democrats in supporting them with health care and poverty relief. But I'm not holding my breath.
Uh-oh. Someone who is SOMEHOW smart enough to see Trump and Trumpism for what it is is apparently CLAIMING to be at least somewhat anti-abortion. My god, THAT can't be!! My brain is thoroughly scrambled.
So......standby to be called a (dreaded) "conservative" !! And maybe even "Cankle lover."
MO-RANS.
Agreed! Fat Hurts is hereby declared a DINO (Democrat in Name Only). He's probably a pedophile and almost certainly a Russian plant!
Uh-oh. Someone who is SOMEHOW smart enough to see Trump and Trumpism for what it is is apparently CLAIMING to be at least somewhat anti-abortion. My god, THAT can't be!! My brain is thoroughly scrambled.
So......standby to be called a (dreaded) "conservative" !! And maybe even "Cankle lover."
MO-RANS.
Agreed! Fat Hurts is hereby declared a DINO (Democrat in Name Only). He's probably a pedophile and almost certainly a Russian plant!
